Case Analysis
Snook et al demonstrates tow coaches name Coach K and Coach Knight. The two individuals offer a conducive reference point for studying path-goal theory. To some extent, this study demonstrates some characteristics of leader-member exchange. For a comprehensive understanding of the principles encompassed by the path-goal theory, a critical evaluation and analysis of the two coaches will be provided. The analysis will be used to assess the leadership style associated with each coach and the implications it has to the coach’s efficiency.
Coach K With reference to Snook et al (2005), demonstrates a directive leadership. According to Cameron (2008), directive leadership refers to a condition where the leader provides advice for …show more content…
According to Snook et al (2005), he actively engaged his players in a quick motivation before they embarked on a team. For example, his “We are going to be great tonight” strategy played a significant role that contributed to the many wins that he experienced. Notably, his words encouraged his players because they were convinced that he had assessed the situation and concluded that they were likely to win. The directive leadership of the coach is evidenced by the rules he used to guide the players. For example, Snook et al demonstrates that he required the players to refrain from any activities that would cause harm to themselves. The policy was effective, as it instilled discipline on the players and encouraged then to engage in activities that were success-oriented. As Cameron (2008) observes, such skills are linked with directive leaders. As Snook et al (2005) concludes, Coach K’s directive style of leadership created a good rapport between him and his players. The players were familiar with his goals for the team and for each one of them. Notably, they derived this information his inspirational tactics. Having noted his aspirations for the team, Coach K’s players worked hard and followed his commands. Undoubtedly, such conditions resulted to numerous wins and successes that saw Coach K become a legend coach at the …show more content…
Snook et al (2005) demonstrates that Knight believed that winning was a continuous cycle driven by hard work and the willingness to learn while following the rules. Additionally, the text shows that Knight believed that preparation was the strongest strategy used by winners. Indeed, his self-pronounced principles worked in correlation with his leadership style, as it is evident that he used them in one of the most successful college basket school teams. In relationship to this leadership model, Knight crowned his principles with discipline and provided that players had to follow all the rules to
Snook et al demonstrates tow coaches name Coach K and Coach Knight. The two individuals offer a conducive reference point for studying path-goal theory. To some extent, this study demonstrates some characteristics of leader-member exchange. For a comprehensive understanding of the principles encompassed by the path-goal theory, a critical evaluation and analysis of the two coaches will be provided. The analysis will be used to assess the leadership style associated with each coach and the implications it has to the coach’s efficiency.
Coach K With reference to Snook et al (2005), demonstrates a directive leadership. According to Cameron (2008), directive leadership refers to a condition where the leader provides advice for …show more content…
According to Snook et al (2005), he actively engaged his players in a quick motivation before they embarked on a team. For example, his “We are going to be great tonight” strategy played a significant role that contributed to the many wins that he experienced. Notably, his words encouraged his players because they were convinced that he had assessed the situation and concluded that they were likely to win. The directive leadership of the coach is evidenced by the rules he used to guide the players. For example, Snook et al demonstrates that he required the players to refrain from any activities that would cause harm to themselves. The policy was effective, as it instilled discipline on the players and encouraged then to engage in activities that were success-oriented. As Cameron (2008) observes, such skills are linked with directive leaders. As Snook et al (2005) concludes, Coach K’s directive style of leadership created a good rapport between him and his players. The players were familiar with his goals for the team and for each one of them. Notably, they derived this information his inspirational tactics. Having noted his aspirations for the team, Coach K’s players worked hard and followed his commands. Undoubtedly, such conditions resulted to numerous wins and successes that saw Coach K become a legend coach at the …show more content…
Snook et al (2005) demonstrates that Knight believed that winning was a continuous cycle driven by hard work and the willingness to learn while following the rules. Additionally, the text shows that Knight believed that preparation was the strongest strategy used by winners. Indeed, his self-pronounced principles worked in correlation with his leadership style, as it is evident that he used them in one of the most successful college basket school teams. In relationship to this leadership model, Knight crowned his principles with discipline and provided that players had to follow all the rules to