Lazaro Cardenas Research Paper

Lazaro Cardenas for the win and Madero for the defeat
Mexico has had obtained a huge reputation of having bad presidents, the people don’t even vote for this very reason, they know that the nation will not change. However, there was a time that the people used to think differently. They used to believe in those promises, that time occurred in the revolution and ended around the 50’s. During this period, the presidents not only secured the democracy in Mexico, they also motivated the people to make the difference and they made good things for the nation. However, if we were to choose who is the president that best represents this idea, it would be Lazaro Cardenas. And, if we were to choose the least best example, it would be Francisco I Madero. Many people would disagree that Madero is not a good example of this because he did start the revolution but, did he accomplish anything while he was …show more content…
That is not something that is going to be in question, he represented the ideals of the Revolution. Madero’s problem was that he did not had enough time in the office to really do something for the nation. He started his presidency in 1911 and it ended in 1913, his presidency lasted only a year (this is because he started in the end of 1911 and ended on the beginning of 1913). thus, leading to the question: what could he have done in less than a year? He was in the middle of the Revolution and his ambassador Henry Lane was already trying to take him out of the power. Madero was also unable to keep the peace within the Nation, one evidence of this is that the Revolution never ended in it’s period as president. And he also never improved the standard of living of the people, mostly because he did not stay on the power enough time. However, is worth mentioning that is was possible that he could have archived its goals as president. But, sadly, he was assassinated, and all his ideas stayed on the election