Jacketta Collins REST386-Morality in Business October 22, 2014 Commissions at Brock Mason When offered the opportunity to make more money, who is the victor and who suffers? In a struggling economy, who will come out as the victor and who will lose? When it is the sole purpose of a company to maximize profits and (in essence) take from consumers should they be held accountable if a customer feels wronged? In the case study “Commissions at Brock Mason”, those are the questions that must be answered. Millions of people feel wronged by big companies like McDonald’s and Apple, claiming that those companies are unethical or immoral.…
Due to the facts found by Mr. Robinson and the hearing outcome, he ordered that Mr. Sterne be restore to his original position and rank, and be compensated for any back pay and benefits that he had lost since his demotion. Additionally, Robinson found that there was irregularities with how the discipline was handed out and there was no due process and progressive discipline before demotion and loss of pay, thus Sterne was discriminated against an was due his return to his past position with back pay. This case again shows, specific issues with retaliation being taken against subordinates without due process and could actual fall into a Title VII Civil Rights Act case, but the District of Columbia has a Civil Process for adjudicating employee…
Carter V. Tokai Financial Services, Inc. In the case, it follows Randy P. Carter and Tokai Financial services, Inc. where Tokai sued Carter for money that was not given under a lease agreement that the two had entered. It as stated that ARC made 4 of the rental payments before they defaulted on the obligation they had with Tokai. Following the ceasing of payment, Tokai the repossessed the equipment and sold it for $5,900. After the sale, Tokai brought a suit against in which they were awarded $56,675.74.…
On 01/15/2017 I, Deputy Daniel Pruitt meet the victim Ashely Thomas at the Mannford Police department for a domestic complaint. Ashley wanted to make a report on her boyfriend Erik Randolph assauting her. Ashely stated she went to her home at the corner of 61st Street and 369th West Aveune in a camper trailer. Ashley stated when she got home Erik was upset with her.…
Q1 The main inquiry in Baker v. Carr was in the case of redistricting was a legitimate issue the courts could deliver proactively to revise manhandle or a political issue. The state contended that it was a political issue, so the courts had no purview. The case demonstrated a standout amongst the most debilitating in the Supreme Court's history, with the choice held over for re-contention on the grounds that the court couldn't achieve a lion's share choice. Equity Charles Evans Whittaker was so resentful about the case, he at long last recused himself from the choice, and the worry over the choice may have added to his initial retirement from the Court.…
One of the most controversial cases in American History was the case of Dred Scott versus Sanford. Dred Scott was a slave who lived with his owner, Doctor John Emerson in the free state of Illinois. Dred Scott and his wife, Harriet, both had lived in a free state for a decade, and they decided to file for emancipation. Commonly, slaves would sue for their freedom if they had live in free territory for a long period of time. Their cases were not at first acknowledged because of the outbreak of cholera and backed up court schedules but eventually their case was heard, and the Scotts won favor.…
From Sweethearts to Sour Tarts, Millionaire Matchmaker Sued The dating scene has changed dramatically over the course of a few years. With more people having access to the internet, online dating is no longer something the desperate or insecure; everybody is dating online. As more people date online, the need to weed out the bad apples from those people who are truly looking for love becomes obvious. When it comes to people who have money, they pay elite matchmakers to weed out the individuals who may not be compatible with them.…
WOOSTER — Family members, longtime friends, fellow pastors and law enforcement officials gathered in the basement of the Wayne County Justice Center recently to wish a tireless worker farewell as he headed into retirement. “His heart was always in the right place,” Capt. James Richards said of the Rev. Lee Anderson, the chaplain of the Wayne County Jail for the past 41 years who was retiring. Richards read a passage from the New Testament about how Jesus thanked his followers for feeding him, caring for him, clothing him and visiting him in prison. Not recalling when they ever did those things to Jesus, his followers asked when did they do it.…
Is there a Constitutional right to burning the American Flag? Does the First Amendment give permission to destroy a pronounced symbol into ash? In the Texas vs. Johnson case, 1984, Gregory Lee Johnson burned an American flag in a protest at the Republican National Convention in Dallas, Texas . While Texas argued it as a criminal offense, the Supreme Court argued, along with the First Amendment, that even though the proper treatment of the flag is encouraged, the action could be portrayed as a freedom of speech. So, does a state have a right to uphold it’s own laws, even if they don’t align with the federal law?…
James Hitesman was a registered nurse and shift supervisor at Bridgeway, Inc, nursing home. He displayed concerns to management about that amount of infectious diseases within the nursing home. He claimed that the incidents of infections were rising at a disturbing rate. The management did not take care of the situation as he desired. Therefore, he told a television reporter about the problems in this nursing home.…
B. Chef Curry’s Covenant Not to Compete Is Likely Unenforceable Because It Does Not Meet All Four Elements of Enforceability. If chefs are considered professionals, Alabama courts will only enforce a noncompetition agreement when an employer has a protectable interest, the restriction is reasonably related to that interest, the restriction is reasonable in time and place, and the restriction imposes no undue hardship upon the employee. All four of these elements must be found, otherwise the non-compete clause will be held unenforceable. 1.…
Wrongful Conviction On the morning of August 10, 1984, Deborah Sykes was brutally stabbed, sexually assaulted, and eventually killed in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. The man convicted for her murder was Darryl Hunt, a 19 year old boy that would go on to spend 20 years in prison for a crime he did not commit. Hunt was convicted based on eye-witness testimony and informants, but was later exonerated based on DNA evidence that matched a man that was caught just a few months after the murder took place. This case is an exemplar of the strength of DNA evidence and the fragility of eyewitness testimony.…
The 1980 court case, Armstrong V. Kline, drew from parents of children with exceptionalities becoming upset with the education system’s 180-day school year rule1. Beginning in January of 1980, they decided that enough was enough and they needed to do something before summer vacation came so, their child/children would not lose everything they learned during the school year1. The parents took on the court case, filing three class action lawsuits, all of which were against Caryl Kline, the secretary of education and chief official of the Department of Education1. The result of this particular case relieved me but, the fact it had to become a court case, I found to be absolutely ridiculous. Also, the terminology they used while describing the…
Dred Scott was a slave who sought his freedom through the American legal system. The 1857 decision by the United States Supreme Court in the Dred Scott case denied his plea, determining that no Negro, the term then used to describe anyone with African blood, was or could ever be a citizen. The decision also invalidated the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had placed restrictions on slavery in certain U.S. territories. Northern abolitionists were outraged. The Dred Scott case became a rallying point for them and contributed to the election of Abraham Lincoln as president in…
The case of W. L. Gore & Associates is an example of employee-centered leadership, which is associated with multiple theories of leadership that are discussed in the chapter. In this case, there are two theories relating to this method of leadership - the contingency theory and the behavioral theory. The leadership style and strategy of Bill Gore is similar to the Contingency theory in the sense that the leadership of W. L. Gore & Associates is relative and entirely dependent on each individual situation (Lussier, 2014). However, regarding Behavioral Theory, it is applied that leadership can indeed be taught, and under different circumstances a leader is expected to be able to adapt to the follower and circumstances. In this case, we have…