Thankfully, both surgeries have a low risk rate even though they require different levels of invasiveness. A laparoscopic ovariectomy is a surgical procedure where only the ovaries are removed from a female pets’ uterus. This technique is started with two small incisions smaller than one inch. Then, a slim video scope is inserted into one of the incisions. Surgical tools are inserted into the other incision to remove the ovaries and to later seal the tissue and blood vessels of the removed organs. This method of spaying is completed by closing the incisions with statures and tissue glue (Curtis, 2015). Therefore, laparoscopic ovariectomy is a surgical surgery that has an exceptionally low level of invasiveness. The risks for this method of practice are almost nonexistent. Some veterinarians argued that leaving the uterus intact would raise the chances of a pet contracting uterine infection or even uterine disease. This argument was put to the test and a study was conducted to determine if this was true. A report …show more content…
Using a scope to perform a laparoscopic ovariectomy gives the veterinarian a better, more magnified view of the abdominal cavity. Having the opportunity to see more clearly during the procedure leads to safer operating and better outcomes. After a laparoscopic spaying the pet owner is instructed to restrict activity for their pet for 5-7 days. An anti-inflammatory medication is needed as well, but only a two-day course (Curtis, 2015). A traditional spaying is a more aggressive procedure when it comes to the handling of the tissue and organs of the pet. Consequently, the recovery time for this method is longer. Veterinarians will instruct pet activity to be restricted for 7-10 days. For larger breeds of dogs, it can take up to two weeks of recovery time before the pet returns back to normal. When comparing the two surgical procedures, laparoscopic offers a speedier recovery to include less stress and trauma on the pet, dramatic reduction in pain (up to 65 percent less), smaller incisions and less bruising; Successfully taking the lead when comparing recovery variances (Curtis, 2015). Which method of spaying to choose isn’t an easy decision to make. Factors such as surgery invasiveness and risks, cost for the surgery and recovery times will likely be considered. One surgery method holds advantages over the other in each of these categories. There is no right or