Langston Hughes Abortion Analysis

Abortion Abortion is the intention termination of a human pregnancy followed by the death of the embryo or fetus. Some people said that the fertilized egg or the fetus is not a person until after birth, but other people argue that the unborn child is person from the moment of conception. R. M. Hare argues that abortion is impermissible but not because the embryo is human, he said that because each of us wants to live not aborted. He gave an example in the past time and he said that suppose if I talk with my other when she decided to aborted me and I am happy, and my mother will not die if she do not aborted me. In these cases I would tell her not to have an abortion me. Furthermore, I will gave her morally advise that she not to have an abortion and that is wrong, and let me to live …show more content…
As result of this if it wrong in this cases, then it is wrong in all cases except when the women would die if she does not abort. However, Judith Jarvis Thomson argues that abortion is morally impermissible, and said that the fetus is a human from the moment of conception. Also, She argues that since the fetus is a human being, so the fetus has a right to life, Furthermore, the mother has a to decide what happens in and to her body, but the fetus's right to life exceeds the mothers right to decide what happens in and to her body. AS result of this an abortion is wrong and impermissible except in some circumstances where pregnancy comes from rape, and when the mother’s life is at risk and she will die if the child is not aborted. However, she also said that for Extreme view the abortion is not allowed even to keep mother’s life. Also, she explain that to support the Extreme view the fetus is an innocent person and if the fetus is killed directly it is considered as murder, and murder is morally not allowed, so killing the embryo is morally