Laissez-Faire
Definition:
The laissez faire leadership style is not supervising and controlling people how are employed. (Jonson 2008)
Adv
• one of the advantages of laissez-faire is that it gives the chance to people to work in every way they want so that they can be productive.(money-zine,2015)
• B
• d
• D
DisAdv
• when people are given to much freedom, chaos can be created so production falls and so it can be said that this kind of leadership is also not very successful.(Johnson,2008)
• They do not have control so the employees do not co-ordinate between them so the leaders tent to be inefficient and can only be applied to highly educated and trained staff.(Paterson,2013)
• According to Yulk(1981) the ‘the absence of effective leadership’ …show more content…
Leaders which follow this kind of leadership style are usually close minded. (Bosiok, Sad, Serbia, 2013)
• As the population of employed people are joining the employed empowerment autocratic leadership is going to disappear because of other leadership styles. (Kippenberger,2002,p.4)
• People usually find it difficult to be appointed a task and be supervised all the time whereas being free to decide makes them more productive. (Yukl, 1981, p.90)
• d
Democratic Leadership
Definition:
Democratic leaders are leaders who give the authority to people working with them to say their ideas and they give the chance to people to have an opinion of how the opinions are going to be taken. (Chaptman,etal,2014,p.285)
Adv
• Democratic leaders make people to respect them and want to work with them as they give them the opportunity to have a role in what is happening in the organisation or in any other area they are working.(Dahlstrom, 2013,p.446)
• Leaders which follow the path of democracy in their leading, usually enjoy large quality of creative ideas and ‘joint decisions’ making their performance being effective, efficient and productive. (Yulk, 1981, p.94)
• c
• …show more content…
So if they have a relationships and the amount of productivity they need, they are not afraid to give rewards. Also if they are not satisfied with what they get they would easily give punishments.
Adv
• An advantage this leaders would have is to meet all the time new people as their job is make people to follow them and have good connections between them.(money-zine,2015)
• Also this kind of leadership is good at meeting datelines and in the case of health issues it can be very important as emergencies are handled quickly and efficiently.(Paterson,2013,p.36)
• This kind of leadership has the ability to ‘motivate’ their employees according to Word press.com (2014) which always leads to efficient and effective results.
• c
Disadv
• Transactional leaders tent to see more their profit and don’t usually see the good of the other people as long as they fulfil the needs of the agreement.
Definition:
The laissez faire leadership style is not supervising and controlling people how are employed. (Jonson 2008)
Adv
• one of the advantages of laissez-faire is that it gives the chance to people to work in every way they want so that they can be productive.(money-zine,2015)
• B
• d
• D
DisAdv
• when people are given to much freedom, chaos can be created so production falls and so it can be said that this kind of leadership is also not very successful.(Johnson,2008)
• They do not have control so the employees do not co-ordinate between them so the leaders tent to be inefficient and can only be applied to highly educated and trained staff.(Paterson,2013)
• According to Yulk(1981) the ‘the absence of effective leadership’ …show more content…
Leaders which follow this kind of leadership style are usually close minded. (Bosiok, Sad, Serbia, 2013)
• As the population of employed people are joining the employed empowerment autocratic leadership is going to disappear because of other leadership styles. (Kippenberger,2002,p.4)
• People usually find it difficult to be appointed a task and be supervised all the time whereas being free to decide makes them more productive. (Yukl, 1981, p.90)
• d
Democratic Leadership
Definition:
Democratic leaders are leaders who give the authority to people working with them to say their ideas and they give the chance to people to have an opinion of how the opinions are going to be taken. (Chaptman,etal,2014,p.285)
Adv
• Democratic leaders make people to respect them and want to work with them as they give them the opportunity to have a role in what is happening in the organisation or in any other area they are working.(Dahlstrom, 2013,p.446)
• Leaders which follow the path of democracy in their leading, usually enjoy large quality of creative ideas and ‘joint decisions’ making their performance being effective, efficient and productive. (Yulk, 1981, p.94)
• c
• …show more content…
So if they have a relationships and the amount of productivity they need, they are not afraid to give rewards. Also if they are not satisfied with what they get they would easily give punishments.
Adv
• An advantage this leaders would have is to meet all the time new people as their job is make people to follow them and have good connections between them.(money-zine,2015)
• Also this kind of leadership is good at meeting datelines and in the case of health issues it can be very important as emergencies are handled quickly and efficiently.(Paterson,2013,p.36)
• This kind of leadership has the ability to ‘motivate’ their employees according to Word press.com (2014) which always leads to efficient and effective results.
• c
Disadv
• Transactional leaders tent to see more their profit and don’t usually see the good of the other people as long as they fulfil the needs of the agreement.