Laclede Gas Co. V. Amoco Oil Case Summary

Decent Essays
Under the UCC, the buyer’s right of specific performance is granted only where the goods are unique or proper circumstances. It has to pass the uniqueness test and other proper circumstances test. It is the extraordinary remedy where the monetary remedy or damages are not enough for the loss of the buyer. The court has the discre-tionary power to grant the specific relief if it thinks fit.
Specific performance includes a right to obtain substitute goods from other market and the right to ask the seller to tender the goods. Specific performance is ap-plied when the buyer cannot buy from other marketplaces of such goods identified to the contract after reasonable effort he is unable to get such goods from other sources or the circumstances reasonably indicate that such effort will be unavailing or if the goods have been shipped under reservation and satisfaction of the security interest in them has been made or tendered.
In Colorado-Ute Electric Ass'n v. Envirotech Corp, a specially designed pollu-tion-control device “unique” and “essentially irreplaceable” once installed. This despite the fact that five other companies had initially bid on the project. No showing was made
…show more content…
It falls under the category of “other proper circumstances”. In Laclede Gas Co. V. Amoco Oil Co., the dispute involved a long-term requirements contract for the delivery of pro-pane. In remanding the case with instructions to enter a decree of specific performance, the court found that propane was readily available on the open market. No evidence was presented to show that the quantity available was insufficient to satisfy the buyer’s re-quirements. The court also accepted expert testimony that the buyer “probably” could not obtain another long-term contract. Determining that the buyer would face “consid-erable expense and trouble” in obtaining new contracts, the court held that specific per-formance was the proper

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The relevant law, UCC Article 2, deals with the sale of goods, determining that goods are movable objects identified in the sale contract, with a sale being defined as the exchange of title from seller to buyer. The facts of the law conclude that the movable objects AVA was selling to Tanzer were, in fact, goods being sold, and not constructed due to the objects being previously manufactured and simply installed in the home. Thus, Article 2 of the UCC had jurisdiction in the…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The lawsuit of Basulto v. Hialeah Automotive had its origins in a contract disagreement between parties. The plaintiffs in the case were Roberto Basulto and Raquel Gonzalez, whom were husband and wife and considered by the courts to be “the buyers”. On the other hand, the defendant in the case was Hialeah Automotive, LLC, who also went by the name of Potamkin Dodge, and was considered by the courts to be “the dealership” (Basulto v. Hialeah, 2014). In 2004, Basulto and Gonzalez purchased from Hialeah Automotive a 2005 Dodge Caravan. According to the buyers, the contract provided to them by the dealership was blank with the assurance that the sums would be filled in at a later time (Basulto v. Hialeah, 2014).…

    • 1940 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Law: Contract Law Reasons: Failure of consideration so, terms are not binding Ratio: Consideration needed in order to achieve constructive dismissal in regards to changes on contract terms. Works Cited Hilton v. Norampac Inc., V-193113CM (Ontario Superior Court of Justice May 22, 2002). Honda Canada Inc. V. Keays, 31739 (Supreme Court of Canada June 27, 2008). Richard A. Yates, T. B.-K. (2011). Buisness Law in Canada (9th ed.).…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ARGUMENT I. THE PETITIONER, IN THIS CASE, WAS AN EMPLOYEE OF PLUS BUILDING, INC., AND NOT AN INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. Respondent claims that Petitioner Mr. Kroplewski was not an employee of Plus Building, Inc., but an independent contractor. Although there is no rigid rule of law to determine whether an employer-employee relationship exists between parties, such determination depends on the particular facts of the case. The range of factors is considered in making that determination including the right to control the manner in which the work is done, the method of payment, the right to discharge, the skill required, and who provided the materials, tools, and equipment.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Judge Casas’ Ruling In APUSA Inc. v The State of California the court rules in favor of APUSA,Inc. The court finds the State of California violated the establishment clause using the Lemon Test and Agostoni test. In both instances the CCQEA explicitly violates the establishment clause by way of money being directly distributed from the government to the religious institutions, joined with a lack of specificity of how the money is to be used. The State of California would be served in adding guidelines to the law clearly dictating that grant money is not to be used for secular purpose.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Case: Ewing v. California, 583 U.S. 11 (2003) — Facts: George Ewing walked into a pro shop of a Los Angeles County golf course where he concealed and stole three golf clubs priced at $399 a piece. Aside from this incident, Ewing had several prior convictions, four of which were serious, violent, and/or felonious. In this case, Ewing was convicted of felony grand theft and sentenced to 25 years to life under California’s three-strike law. Procedural History: the California Court of Appeal and the Second Appellate District affirmed the trial court’s ruling. The State Supreme Court denied review, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari, as well as upheld the decisions of the lower courts.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Case Name: Midler v. Ford Motor Co. 1988, U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, 849.F.2d 460 Procedural History: Bette Midler (Plaintiff) appealed a judgment summary of the US District Court granting the summary judgement in favor of Ford Motor Co (Defendant). Middler moved for appropriation of her distinct voice for use in a car advertisement. Statement of Facts: Ford Motor Co. aired a car commercial which they played songs from the 70’s to give a nostalgic feeling to their audience. Ford asked Midler to sing one of her well known songs for the commercial but she declined. Ford acquired permission from the song’s copywriter owner and proceeded with a sound alike of Midler.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Us Vs Pachon Case Summary

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Oyinkansola Lapite January 28th 2016 MFC 483 Case Title and Citation: United States of America v.Juan Manuel Contento-Pachon, 723 F.2d 691 Relevant Case Facts: The defendant Juan Manuel Pachon received a job offered from one of his passenger named Jorge to be a driver of a privately own car. Pachon expressed an interest in the job and decided to meet both Jorge and the owner of the car. The next day Jorge proposed that Pachon swallowed cocaine and transport to the United States, and that if he mentioned the proposition to anyone he would get in trouble. A week later Pachon told Jorge he would not be transporting the drugs. Jorge replied to Pachon by mentioned important and personal…

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unit 21 D1

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    D1: Evaluate the effectiveness of term in a given contract. For D1, I will be evaluating the effectiveness of terms considered in a mobile contract. I will evaluate how implied terms of statue protect consumers from defective goods from sellers and how business protect themselves from liabilities through exclusion clause.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ethical problem in the case of Ledbetter vs. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company is that the company unfairly paid Lilly Ledbetter while working there for 19 years due to her gender. Unfortunately, women have struggled since the mid-1900’s to gain the respect of the working-class industry in receiving equal pay and treated fairly as men. In some cases, researchers state that women in the workforce will not get paid equally for the same job function because of discrimination of gender gap. Throughout her employment with the company, her exposure to information led her to believe that she was being paid unfairly in comparison to her fellow male employees.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kennedy vs Louisiana (2007) was a case about a guy name Patrick Kennedy and is charged with aggravated rape of his eight year old stepdaughter. The eight year old child suffered serious injuries from Mr. Kennedy. Under the Louisiana Law, the prosecutor is allowed to seek the death penalty against defendants who are found guilty of raping children under the age of twelve. The jury granted the prosecutor the death penalty in which he sought. The difference between the Coker vs Georgia case and the Kennedy vs. Louisiana case is that a child is involved.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This question is concerned with the Unfair Contract Act 1977 and how it has been affected by reforms introduced by the Consumer Rights Act 2015. The Consumer Rights Act 2015 reforms the unfair contract terms in consumer contracts. This is covered in part 2 of the Consumers Rights Act which amends the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 in relation to business to consumer contracts and cancels the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Company Overview: Bayou Group LLC The Bayou Group LLC (Bayou Group) was founded by Samuel Israel III along with two co-founders, James Marquez and Daniel Marino in 1996. It attracted many investors as there is high expectation on it produces high returns. Bayou was a service company that does trading and investing client’s fund to produce return.…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Plaintiff in this case has failed to form a prima facie case that either general or specific jurisdiction exists over the Defendant. The Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) was granted and the Defendant was given leave to amend. In order for a District Court to hear a case it must have jurisdiction.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    VII. Conclusion 1. Even though Acme Fireworks started out as a sole proprietorship, the expanding markets made the company realize it would be better off switching over to a single member LLC. The UCC warants a rate of control over competting markets and states while legally protecting the company’s limited legal liability in contractual ventures.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays