It is easy to say that the knowledge that we have is enough, it is harder to venture out and acquire new knowledge. You should also consider that once you know something, you will always know it. What if it is information that did not want to be gained, is that when it becomes dangerous. It could also possibly be us not fully understanding the knowledge. I believe that was Dr. Frankenstein’s case. Yes, he knew how to bring back the dead to the living, but did he comprehend that this is still a person, that it could have very well been a person, that there may have been consequences to his actions. I believe this is what makes him the monster. His decision to make this monster with nothing but selfish intent and desire to expand his own knowledge, then to disregard the creature as if it was he who made the mistake, clearly shows that Dr. Frankenstein was the true
It is easy to say that the knowledge that we have is enough, it is harder to venture out and acquire new knowledge. You should also consider that once you know something, you will always know it. What if it is information that did not want to be gained, is that when it becomes dangerous. It could also possibly be us not fully understanding the knowledge. I believe that was Dr. Frankenstein’s case. Yes, he knew how to bring back the dead to the living, but did he comprehend that this is still a person, that it could have very well been a person, that there may have been consequences to his actions. I believe this is what makes him the monster. His decision to make this monster with nothing but selfish intent and desire to expand his own knowledge, then to disregard the creature as if it was he who made the mistake, clearly shows that Dr. Frankenstein was the true