Lab Report

Improved Essays
Antibiotics and disinfectants are both used to kill and prevent the growth of bacteria. Antibiotics come from the fungi family and are commonly used to kill bacteria. While each antibiotic works differently for particular bacterias, all of them either target physiological pathways to enable the disruption and killing of bacteria or it inhibits of cell growth ((of prokaryotic cells)). The physiological pathways are genetic and biochemical (act in converting to mediate bacterial response to an antibiotic), targeting the interactions and coordination of bacterial response pathways–DNA synthesis, RNA synthesis, cell wall synthesis, and protein synthesis. Disinfectants are able to harm both prokaryotic cell (bacteria), but also eukaryotic cells; …show more content…
The antibiotics that the scientists will be using are penicillin, tetracycline, and streptomycin; the two chosen disinfectants were hand sanitizer and multi-surface cleaner. The antibiotic Penicillin targets bacteria-specific proteins when the bacterium divides; it inhibits the reformation of a new cell wall and pops the daughter cells. Penicillin is most effective against gram-positive bacteria. Unlike penicillin, Tetracycline is effective for both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Tetracycline inhibits protein synthesis by binding to the 30s ribosome in bacterial cells, thus preventing the attachment of aminoacyl-tRNA to the RNA ribosome complex and simultaneously inhibiting other steps of protein biosynthesis. Lastly, streptomycin is effective on gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. It targets protein synthesis, but through attachment close to a small subunit on the ribosome, as a result, it secretes abnormal, faulty proteins that ultimately kill the …show more content…
Near the circumference of the yellow paper, there is an area–near the top– that shows an inhibition reaction; however, it does not originate from the sanitizer because it is covered in bacteria–cloudy appearance. From these observations, the scientists can narrow inhibition origin to the blue paper–saturated in multi-surface cleaner. Although the inhibition area for the blue paper is not in an easily calculable shape, its inhibition area covers almost half of the area inside the plate–similar to tetracycline. In conclusion, the scientists can infer that the Bacillus bacteria is more sensitive to the multi-surface cleaner than sanitizer. (Concept) Described previously, antibiotics and disinfectants are used to kill and inhibit bacterial growth but how they go about the process and its effectiveness differs depending on the characteristics of its target–prokaryote, eukaryote, gram-positive, gram-negative, and so on. The three antibiotics displayed signs of it affecting the bacteria, but tetracycline also showed that it was the the antibiotic meant for the job. The same goes for the disinfectants; the multi-surface cleaner comprised of stronger solutions (ie. bleach) was better for the job than the hand sanitizer which is used on the human body. Therefore, while antibiotics and disinfectants both kill and inhibit bacteria,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In addition, streptomycin has similar properties to beta-lactam antibiotics such that it can modify the permeability of the bacteria’s wall itself, allowing faster diffusion across the membrane (Davis…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nt1310 Unit 3 Lab Report

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages

    4. Describe the effectiveness of different methods used in medical settings to control microbial…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Whereas, erythromycin should be slightly more effective than tetracycline because the study indicated that only 38% of isolates were resistance as compared to 58% for tetracycline. (McBride et al., 2007). Neomycin was rank to be the most effective because a break out of high-level gentamicin resistant Enterococcus faecalis was noted to be not resistant to neomycin in a Norwegian hospital(Wendelbo et al., 2003). A control treatment was also assigned by not adding any antibiotic. If no antibiotic is applied to the Enterococcus faecalis , then there should be no zone of inhibition for the control group.…

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ability of the organism to resist antibiotics is another mechanism…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction: The effectiveness of Antimicrobial agents against Microorganisms Population of microorganisms or growth are killed and/or inhibited by natural or synthetic chemical antimicrobial controls (Madigan, et al 2012). Antimicrobial agents are grouped according to their efficacy against microorganisms. Bactericidal that kill and bacteriostatic prevent and/or reduce growth (Madigan et al, 2012).…

    • 2232 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    a. The Wescodyne was the most effective against E. coli and Staphylococcus aureus. The zone of inhibition around the Wescodyne for both bacteria was over 20 mm. Only Wescodyne was able to inhibit both bacteria. E. coli was inhibited by hydrogen peroxide and 70% ethyl alcohol.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The hypothesis was rejected after the testing due to certain chemicals not performing what was standardized and predicted by the hypothesis. According to the overall averages, the number one most effective was Betadine with an average of 36.33mm, Hand soap was second, third was Lysol, Isopropyl alcohol scored fourth, fifth place was Germ X, and seventh had the smallest average of 7mm which was Neosporin. Betadine was expected to have a high score due to its popularity in treating wounds but the products with the shocking results were Germ X and isopropyl alcohol. Both chemicals are made from alcohol that is said to be effective against bacteria but both scored very low.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The same process was repeated for the next three hand cleaners and sanitiser, into three separate agar plates. The tweezers were washed and sterilised in between each agar plate The labelled plates were placed in a designated area, upside down, over the period of three…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robby Bauer Investigation

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In this experiment there are four antibiotics, which will be used Kanamycin,Tetracycline ,Erythromycin , and Clindamycin to examine how it affects the bacteria. Kanamycin is typically…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In everyday life, people use antibacterial products to sanitize their homes. Some of the common active ingredients in household cleaning products are thymol, lactic acid, sodium hypochlorite, and ethanol (e.g. active ingredient in some hand sanitizers). The purpose of our experiment was to determine if antibacterial products lost effectiveness in killing common bacteria in everyday environments after repeated use. This is an important environmental issue because if these products are losing effectiveness, then our common living areas are not being properly sanitized and this could lead to more illnesses caused by the bacteria. The hypothesis in this study is that thymol will lose its effectiveness to kill bacteria after repeated treatments…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dalise Atwell BIO 212 Dr. Boles Excelsior College Penicillin and its Impact on Microbiology Penicillin has saved many lives past and current. “Before the discovery and use of penicillin, infectious diseases had been the leading cause of death throughout history. Furthermore, the therapeutic tools available for treating infections were few and of limited use. ”(Kardos 2011) Penicillin has been the drug of choice when treating many diseases.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The lack of an added antibacterial agent should make it less effective in the removal of unhealthy bacteria on the skin, yet is also does not remove the harmless bacteria living on the…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It consists of a combination of two antibacterial agents, bacitracin (C66H101N17O16SZn) and neomycin (C23H46N6O13). Bacitracin is mainly active against gram-positive organisms, such as Clostridia, Corynebacterium Diphtheriae, Hemolytic streptococci, Staphylococci, Treponema. Bacitracin is also active on some gram-negative pathogens such as Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria, in addition to Actinomycetes and Fusobacteria. Resistance to bacitracin is extremely uncommon. Meanwhile, neomycin acts on both gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens including staphylococci, Proteus, Enterobacter aerogenes, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Salmonellae, shigallae, Haemophilus influenza, Pasteuerella, Neisseria meningitides, Vibro cholera, Bordetella pertussis, Bacillus anthracis, Corynebacterium diptheriae, Streptococcus faecalis, Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Borrelia and Leptospira interrogans (L. icterohemorrhagicae).…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The plates in an upside down state were incubated at 37 °C for 24 hours, and the diameter of inhibition zone around the disc were measured and sensitivity and resistance of strains were determined and then results were compared with CLSI standard table.20 In each experiment, a disc containing the solvent dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) 10% was determined as a negative control and a disc containing Vancomaycin 30 μg/disc and Ciprofloxacin 5 μg/disc standard positive control was used as an antibiotic. The tests were repeated three times and the results were presented in the…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They shows high tolerance towards many disinfectants used. Although the microbial cells within are vulnerable, they gain protection from the EPS in the matrix which retards penetration of some disinfectants into the biofilms. Some of the cells within also activate the response pathways to the different antimicrobials. The biofilm may also provide different microenvironments that have altered pH and other abiotic factors as compared with their surroundings, which may inhibit disinfection. Some cells within biofilm also change physiologically, making some disinfection methods ineffective [4].…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays