1. What is the focal point of LMX theory? How does LMX theory challenge a basic assumption common to prior theories?
The LMX theory focus on the dyadic relationship between the followers and the leaders. Which validates our experience of how people within organizations relate to one another and the leader. The LMX theory challenges other theories priory discussed in class on what their focal point is. The prior theories focal points were the trait approach, skills approach and style approach, which all focus on either the leader or the followers solely. While the LMX theory focus on the relationship between the two.
2. Contrast the experiences of in-group and out-group members. Have you observed groups that fit these descriptions in …show more content…
Regarding out-group teams, this would be Cashiers, and the L (leader) would simple oversee department, watching and waiting to a light to flash signaling help is needed. There is a low relationship between the leader and followers because there is very little interaction and support seen from the followers. That is not the same for in group, which I would label as the sale floor. Where the leaders would be working with the followers to complete tasks and reach goals. This would lead to a strong relationship between the two.
3. Explain the concept of transformational leadership. How did Burns interpret the concept? Distinguish between transactional and transformational leadership.
The concept of transformational leadership is the process that changes and transforms individuals. Where TL involves an exceptional form of influence that moves followers to accomplish more. The TL is more concerned with emotions, values, ethics, standards and long term goals. Burns interpreted transformational as the process of engaging with others to create a connection that increases motivation and morality in both the leader and the follower. While transactional focuses on the exchange that occurs between the leader and their followers.
4. Define/describe pseudotransformational leadership. Give two examples of leaders that fit this leadership style. Explain the difference between personalized leadership and
The LMX theory focus on the dyadic relationship between the followers and the leaders. Which validates our experience of how people within organizations relate to one another and the leader. The LMX theory challenges other theories priory discussed in class on what their focal point is. The prior theories focal points were the trait approach, skills approach and style approach, which all focus on either the leader or the followers solely. While the LMX theory focus on the relationship between the two.
2. Contrast the experiences of in-group and out-group members. Have you observed groups that fit these descriptions in …show more content…
Regarding out-group teams, this would be Cashiers, and the L (leader) would simple oversee department, watching and waiting to a light to flash signaling help is needed. There is a low relationship between the leader and followers because there is very little interaction and support seen from the followers. That is not the same for in group, which I would label as the sale floor. Where the leaders would be working with the followers to complete tasks and reach goals. This would lead to a strong relationship between the two.
3. Explain the concept of transformational leadership. How did Burns interpret the concept? Distinguish between transactional and transformational leadership.
The concept of transformational leadership is the process that changes and transforms individuals. Where TL involves an exceptional form of influence that moves followers to accomplish more. The TL is more concerned with emotions, values, ethics, standards and long term goals. Burns interpreted transformational as the process of engaging with others to create a connection that increases motivation and morality in both the leader and the follower. While transactional focuses on the exchange that occurs between the leader and their followers.
4. Define/describe pseudotransformational leadership. Give two examples of leaders that fit this leadership style. Explain the difference between personalized leadership and