In discourse analysis a distinction is often made between spoken and written discourse. Although there are typical differences between the two, Analysis of both modes encounters the problem of representing relevant context. Differences between oral and written language have specific applicability to many types of practical linguistic works, each style has its own characteristics; they are different text types and consequently different discourses. Therefore, it is not wise to choose both of them sporadically in researches. These variations are as a result of different texts and genres They can be mixed with each other in settings where spoken language occurs in the form: presentations, messages, public debates, conversations, and interviews.
…show more content…
Concerning the balance of interactions and utterances similarly with the interlocutors’ relationship there are two categories of interview deliver, in one hand, one is considered to be written, revised, and reviewed before the speech takes place, and in the other hand is one that the speakers are not equal, in other words the interviewer is the dominant position and has the prepared notes while the interviewee usually required to speak and analyse the sequence spontaneously with some overlaps, pauses, and hesitation. Sometimes we can find like a smart interviewee that can confuse the issue by throwing question back for example: “I believe that’s an intrusive question; let me ask you what you would do in that situation”. Taking everything into account, from those found in oral communication as well as to determine what factors are responsible for the differences and characteristics of the spoken discourse analysis, moreover, we discovered that the core differences of all the mentioned parameters could be measured to the nature of interpersonal involvement(participants) and the nature of the individual task(speech event) in addition to credibility and the way the participants express their abilities and
Concerning the balance of interactions and utterances similarly with the interlocutors’ relationship there are two categories of interview deliver, in one hand, one is considered to be written, revised, and reviewed before the speech takes place, and in the other hand is one that the speakers are not equal, in other words the interviewer is the dominant position and has the prepared notes while the interviewee usually required to speak and analyse the sequence spontaneously with some overlaps, pauses, and hesitation. Sometimes we can find like a smart interviewee that can confuse the issue by throwing question back for example: “I believe that’s an intrusive question; let me ask you what you would do in that situation”. Taking everything into account, from those found in oral communication as well as to determine what factors are responsible for the differences and characteristics of the spoken discourse analysis, moreover, we discovered that the core differences of all the mentioned parameters could be measured to the nature of interpersonal involvement(participants) and the nature of the individual task(speech event) in addition to credibility and the way the participants express their abilities and