The Role Of Jean-Paul Marat's Personal Role In The French Revolution

Improved Essays
In this investigation Jean-Paul Marat’s newspaper, L’Ami Du Peuple, and his personal role in the French Revolution will be compared to the French radical group, the Jacobins, to determine what extent did Marat’s newspaper influence the Jacobins’ policies during the Revolution. Shifts in political or social stances, personal ideals, and even governmental beliefs in the material covered in L’Ami du Peuple and the actions taken by the group will be talked about to determine a relationship between the two. The relationship between Jean-Paul Marat and Maximilien Robespierre will be looked at due to the position Robespierre held within the Jacobins. Comparisons between the groups of people who read Marat’s publication and those who were Jacobins, …show more content…
He was liberal and became increasingly more liberal as the Revolution continued, yet he still maintained that the king was the one to rule France but with the possibility of impeachment. Several of writers have even mention that Marat didn’t believe in a republican form of government in his early years and did not refer to it in his newspaper either (Gottschalk, 1921). Marat had pre-held conviction while entering the Revolution, ones that were developed along side his interest in government and society in England and France. Marat’s beliefs and opinions were also strengthened by studies that centered around John Wilkes, an 18th century journalist and politician that possibly began English Radicalism (Sainsbury, 1995). Due to the Revolution, that introduced him into political life, Marat learned more about the upper classes which support his preconceived opinions and drove him to speak for the lower …show more content…
Even after the first appearance of his newspaper Marat still believed in a monarchy for France, he just had altered his beliefs in what the king could and couldn’t do. Marat had came to believe that he always considered Louis XVI an enemy of the Revolution and that Louis should abdicate and leave the Dauphin and his education to Robespierre. Though the king proved himself unable to rule France Marat still believed in a monarchy over a republic, believing that the proposed constitution was a complete failure (Gottschalk, 1921). With his publication Marat appealed and circulated to the French as well as spread his beliefs through the county. L’Ami du Peuple gained support from mainly craftsman, small entrepreneurs, and government officials, it also was circulated more in urban areas rather than rural ones, which likely affected the number of Jacobins in the countryside compared to cities (Fajn, 1972). Artisans and petty tradesmen, including shoemakers, masons, butchers, made up 25.4 percent of the Jacobin clubs and later increased to 33.5 percent of the club. The sans-culottes, which Marat appealed and supported to, made up about 50 percent of the clubs members, suggesting that the circulation and the issues addressed in Marat’s newspaper membership. Of course membership varied in each Jacobin Club based on the regions, but due to the large number of artisans and tradesmen they

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    King Louis XVI addressed the Assembly in February of 1790, and offered his full support for the Revolution. His simple speech moved the legislators deeply, as he approved new reforms, offered support in producing the new constitution, and officially accepted the Civil Constitution. However, would the king stand by his words? The creditability of the king was deeply undermined, and the abolition of the monarch, and establishment of a republic became ever increasing. Despite his lack of popular approbation, Louis XVI did abolish the death penalty as well as the labor tax, however within this Revolution, Louis XVI was seen as the bad guy.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Napoleon was therefore seen as a progressive and thusly favored by a sizable portion of the British public. Even though the two nations were at war, ideologies were able to travel across the English Channel in both directions, fueling a progressivist fervor in the British Radical party which was most definitely vocal and thusly heard. The Loyalist party, however, attacked Napoleon’s character on the basis of illegitimacy. He was certainly an emperor in terms of power and influence, but Loyalists, whose rhetoric has since become hegemonic and embedded in Western prisms, claimed that his rule was undeserved—that he was not born into his position as was expected of a king. The common argument against Napoleon’s character in my anecdotal environment has been that of a monster who took his emperorship by bloody force during the 18 Brumaire coup.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The French Revolution had many causes for its occurrence including, but not limited to, their leader, unfair treatment of the estates, and poor living conditions of the lower class. This led the people to revolt and made life even more chaotic for the residents of France. Their government, an absolute monarchy, gave King Louis XVI the right to do whatever he wanted for the “well-being” of France. As explained in Document 1, “He ruled by the divine right theory which held that he had received his power to govern from God and was therefore responsible to God alone.” This means that the king had complete control over the power and finance of France and often used it to only benefit himself.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    2nd Essay - Rough Draft In Rousseau, Burke, and Revolution in France, 1791 author Gary Kates states that “Furet [claimed] the Revolution embraced a radical ideology of popular sovereignty so that any abuse of power could be excused so long as it was achieved in the name of the people” (175). Personally, I agree with this statement because the people were willing to do anything to get what they desired. The French Revolution was built upon the fact that French citizens desired to control the fate of their own country and not have a sole figure, the King, be in charge of it. In order to achieve what was desired, citizens of France frequently abused power.…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The French Revolution changed the country of France permanently when the people overthrew the monarchy and established republic. Although the Revolution had many causes and long-lasting effects, in his book When the King Takes Flight, author Timothy Tackett argues that Louis XVI’s decision to flee France with his family, and its ultimate failure, was a major event that altered the course of the Revolution. The townspeople who had discovered the King were faced with the difficult decision as to which side of the Revolution they were going to take. Ultimately stopping the King by choosing to side with the National Assembly, the towns prior beliefs created a pivotal moment in the Revolution and produced a new long-term way of thinking amongst…

    • 1084 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reign Of Terror Dbq

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Jacobins were violent and militant, the most radical faction in the National Assembly compared to the Girondins who preferred a monarchical leadership. The firebrand Jacobins had their way and Maximilien Robespierre took over the leadership. He would later be executed for the murder of 15,000 people. Any dissident voice was considered a confession to anti-revolt and therefore a candidate for execution. ‘Virtue without terror,’ Robespierre recorded, is ‘fatal’ (Robespierre, n.p).…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Annotated Bibliography Secondary Sources Andress, David. The French Revolution and the People. London: Hambledon and London, 2004. Andress?s publication provides the perspective of the people and the revolution.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This source will contribute to my research and my paper by aiding me in showing where the ideas of the philosophes are present in the revolution, and how they help progress it. Coat, Nanette. “Ironies of Representation: The Legislator in Rousseau, Robespierre, and Volney.” Neophilologus: 358-72.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many historians have found it difficult to precisely define a reason as to what caused ‘The Terror,’ this is due to it being a culmination of terrible events leading to tyranny. ‘The Terror’ can be defined as the period within 1793 and 1794, when the Robespierre subjugated Jacobian group executed, without remorse, any opposing citizens to their regime. Through the critical analysis of Maximilien Robespierre’s speech ‘On the moral and political principles of domestic policy’ in conjunction with Revolutionary France written by Furet Francois and other secondary sources, this essay will argue the differing perspectives provided by historians to discover a definitive cause to ‘The Terror’ through a common relationship that it holds with the theme of virtue. The context of this period being, the Industrial…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The French and American War of Independence had similarities and conflicts. The revolution and American War of Independence were the samples of civilian’s rebellion against their regime. The French rebelled against their government during a violent fashion, as did the Americans. Britain’s treasury was drained in order that they taxed America and infuriated the colonists; almost like the French treasury being low, in order that they declared war on alternative states to undertake to fill again the treasury; French, and War of American Independence had their own declarations and constitutions written. Each country won their revolutions; Besides, France, wished a brand new government and extra money and food offer; but the America simply wished their independence from land; but America was burdensome issues and numbers from land that were laborious on them; and France were those laborious on others for cash to refill them provides.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The French Revolution had numerous reasons for the revolt. Financial crisis, the Enlightenment, and social changes throughout France were the key reasons behind it. The monarchy had made poor financial decisions during the 18th century. They had to borrow money from foreign nations increasing their debt and leading to their inevitable bankruptcy. Then they had a poor harvest of wheat in 1788 and had high bread prices in 1789 this made it hard on struggling families.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By definition, noblesse oblige is the inferred responsibility of the privileged people to act with generosity and nobility toward those less privileged. A Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens expresses how the concept of noblesse oblige is heavily neglected because the aristocracy has a deep hatred for the third estate, the aristocracy uses their riches for their own personal gain, and the rich make no effort to help the less fortunate. The upper class of France during the French Revolution constituted only three percent of the population, yet a majority of those in the first and second estate disrespect and detest the third estate completely. Monsieur the Marquis, a character in the text, displays a strong hatred for his inferiors on…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The French Revolution was a very influential time within the public’s eye and set the foundation for the future centuries to come throughout the world. Among the most influential, whom basically leads the French Revolution, include those whom had titles residing in the Constituent Assembly, Monsieur Dufourny de Villiers, Olympe de Gouges, Robespierre, Pierre Antoine Lesueur and Napoleon. From people, such as those previously stated, ideas and objectives of the men and women who participated in the French Revolution changed very little as time progressed; the ideas and objectives of French revolutionaries have always been centered around ideas of equality, liberty, and freedom. Ideas of equality were seen as influential in this era due to…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As the Revolution gained more power, its leaders became more paranoid. In 1793, Maximilien Robespierre, who had assumed most of the power in France, declared that a reign of terror would begin. During this period of time, the French government’s first priority was keeping the Revolution safe from people who wanted…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the French Revolution society was made up of three separate phases. The three that are brought up are the Moderate Phase, the Radical Phase, and the Thermidor Phase. The people of the French Revolution created the phases to change the form of government and society. The Moderate phase and Radical phase can be shown throughout the French Revolution. The Moderate Phase existed to form a new form of government known as a monarchy.…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays