Kludgeocracy In America

Improved Essays
In the 239 years that the United States of America has been an independent, established nation, numerous developments and conflicts have resulted in confusion and conflict over how the founders of the country intended for it to be governed. Although the nation, as well as the world around it, has changed, many outdated policies and ideas about the way the country should be run still remain. These outdated and unclear policies and practices have led to political corruption and confusion. There is also an increasing sense of political polarization, and Americans are encouraged more now than ever to take extreme stands with regards to their political beliefs and practices. The combined contemporary issues of political corruption and polarization …show more content…
A kludge is defined as, “an ill-assorted collection of parts assembled to fulfill a particular purpose...a clumsy but temporarily effective solution to a particular fault or problem” (Teles, 1). Thus, a kludgeocracy is a system in which problems are remedied with a series of short-term solutions, which more often than not serve the interests of those creating and approving them in the moment, rather than with long-term solutions that benefit the masses, or solutions that eradicate the issue altogether. Rather than dealing with issues of liberal versus conservative values, or the continuing struggle between federal and state powers, kludgeocracy is the question of complexity versus simplicity (Teles, 1). The more short-term policy solutions are employed, the more complexity there will be in the American government system, because the system will not only continue to be flawed and fragmented, but will also be hastily patched in manners that will only lead to further problems in the …show more content…
America’s “federal” system is not, in fact, purely a federal system. In a true federal system, there is a clear difference between state and national governments, but this is not true of the American government (Teles, 5). In America, the respective powers and responsibilities of the federal and state governments overlap and are not clearly divided, which leads to confusion over matters that would seem to be important parts of the foundation of the American government. Instead, the American political system can be described as “indirect and incoherent” (Teles, 2). Confusion over such a seemingly basic issue can have disastrous results. For example, when Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans in 2005, there were miscommunications as to whether the levees were the responsibility of the state or federal government because the system is so convoluted. Confusion over one basic issue of responsibility because of the unclear political system had detrimental effects that the people of New Orleans are still trying to overcome, ten years later (Teles, 3). In a system so convoluted that even those involved are not certain of their own responsibilities, how can citizens possibly be expected to be well informed as to the specifics of their government? The average American knows which party they support and has a general idea as to why, but the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Considering the fundamental differences between John Adams and Thomas Jefferson dating back to the Declaration of Independence, the two running against one another would prove to be an interesting battle. While Adams reported having a “general distrust of common people” (19) Jefferson believed in “individual liberty and equality of opportunity” (20). These two beliefs became the groundwork for how each candidate would present their ideal form of governmental functioning. Likewise, it is through this election that groups of people began to separate, agreeing or disagreeing with politicians and how the government should play a role in a…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Partisan polarization occurs when a government is highly divided because they have different views in politics. The American government is highly polarized because of previous events that occurred, as well as laws that have changed, allowing for a polarized government. In this essay we are going to look at how high partisan polarization affects the party in government, party organization, and the party in the electorate. Also how partisan polarization affects the three branches of government, and whether or not party polarization is a good or bad thing.…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All citizens of the United States have, at one point or another, been taught that America is a nation founded on the principles of a democratic society. Principles that, forged in the crucible of war, endow it citizens with an undeniable right to directly participate in the political process. America’s Forefathers would be profoundly disappointed, however, to learn that the unchecked influence of special interest has sullied the very fabric of United States politics. The Founding Fathers, in spite of their boundless knowledge, had not the foresight to see just how easily monetary influence would try the fortitude of their burgeoning political system. The effects of their unknowingness permeate throughout the United States government; yet still the American people are seemingly unware of – or perhaps altogether unmoved by – the astonishing amount of money being funneled into the political machine, let alone the identities of those making such remarkable donations.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, even within this tame political arena, Democrats still identified strongly with their candidates and rooted intensely for them, and vice versa for Republicans. Although past electorates were undoubtedly just as zealously partisinal as contemporary voters, the political polarization seen today is unlike the partisanship of the past. Transitioning from an age of high politics, American Congressmen, in recent years, have no longer been unified by the external threat of the Soviet Union (or any serious international threat for that matter); instead of debating foreign policy, domestic issues have filled the gap. Now free to debate every manner of domestic issue, party lines have become more concrete, leading to an excavation of the center of the bell curve and a decline in ‘across the aisle’ mingling. In contrast to prior decades, it was enthusiastic partisanship for their candidate (and by extension, their party) rather than having fundamentally incompatible beliefs that fueled their pious…

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This election caused a massive political polarization, which still hasn’t faded. So, in order to better understand American politics, it is important to find the cause of current polarization. Before talking about…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the United States government was designed to be the best for the people, why does it cause so many problems in the lives of the citizens today? In the papers today it is uncommon to not find some article talking about some issue that is going on in politics. The government has lost many of the original principles that the Founding Fathers had in place to make sure the government’s main goal was to keep the country good and safe for the people. Problems facing the government today are what has caused this loss in principles, and ushered in a an era of gridlocks, corruption, and corporate influence on the government. In Congress, issues have become tougher to solve because of gridlocks.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In George Washington’s Farewell Address, he warned that independence, peace at home and abroad, safety, prosperity, and liberty were all dependent upon the unity between the states. He discouraged the nation from separating into factions, ““The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism.” Having Washington 's warning in mind, it’s ironic that his personally appointed Secretary of Treasury, Alexander Hamilton, and Secretary of State, Thomas Jefferson, formed the basis of political parties. Both helped guide the United States in interpreting the Constitution…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kludgeocracy Examples

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Government today could not be anything other than clumsy. Kludgeocracy is a predictable result of the complex features of the American regime. Its baleful consequences cannot be minimized without significant changes in dominant societal values and the larger government system, although changes can occur in institutions at the margins, and values can shift. It is necessary to come up with a solution to reverse the problem and find ways to prevent it from worsening. America could be anywhere else rather than the clumsy situation it finds itself in…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Prompt: Construct and develop your commentary using the assigned reading provided to you on authored by Dr. Michael Greve. “The AEI Federalism Project” is a program established by the American Enterprise Institute to provide a forum for the discussion of American Federalism. Your work should be an original interpretation of the content of the article and will address and answer the following: Develop an explanation for the principle of federalism, Address the concept of competitive federalism, Explain how federalism empowers citizens, Illustrate how federalism replicates private economic principles, Describe how mobility and choice relate to federalism, Discuss how federalism addresses the concerns of centralization, Provide an examination…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Straight Ticket Voting

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Symptoms and Diagnosis In order to diagnose the root cause it is important to begin by looking at the symptoms present. In recent years there has been a focus in popular political science of editorials, blogs, and campaigns to talk about certain simple problems. As stated earlier, I believe that while potentially worrying, that these are not the problem in and of themselves, merely being symptoms of a greater dysfunction in the system. The symptoms I will discuss are political polarization, low voter turnout, and perceived lack of fairness.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ever since America was founded, its population has always struggled with the balance between national and local politics. A national government was favored because of its ability to maintain cohesiveness among the whole population, while local, smaller governments were favored in order to limit the powers of the national government and to prevent the tyranny the colonists faced before fleeing from Britain. While some Americans argue that states’ rights hold more importance over the power of the federal government, an “overall trend in American history shows the increase of dominance of local over national politics.” The dominance of the federal government is beneficial for American society because it is more efficient, more democratic, and…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After America’s long journey of seeking freedom from governmental oppression, the newly formed nation was skeptical when it came to the discussion of new government authority. Many Americans were still uneasy about consolidated power, while others were aware of the prevalent national instability caused by the lack thereof. Though, in the end, the Constitution prevailed and has become the cornerstone of American government, the path that led to this enduring document was gradual and filled with apprehension and debate. Both sides of the issue had very clear and valid notions about either their support or opposition to the Constitution, and in the end were able to find common ground through patience and compromise.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mohammad Shakhwar HIS-103-11651 Professor Cory Davis When you look at what is happening in American politics today, you hear all the time that politics has never been so divisive. That we as a nation are more divided than ever. This may be true, however there has always been a deep divide in the country going all the way back to the nation’s founding.…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Keeping the Peace – Responsibility for Insuring Domestic Tranquility in the United States Insure domestic tranquility is one of the most important clauses in the Preamble to the Constitution because it provides an overriding guideline about the importance of keeping peace within the United States. The United States’ founding fathers defined this phrase as the promise to run the country will be run as perfectly as can be. Domestic tranquility means no fighting between the states and peace in the public. A better understanding of who controls this theme has evolved throughout the country’s history. Although the general public had some power in issues in the country, the idea of insuring domestic tranquility evolved from the people responsible for keeping the country calm and peaceful to the government taking over the responsibility because the government had more power and control than the people.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Republican Party is moving in a more conservative direction and the Democratic Party staying consistently liberal on major issues of public policy (Jones 2001). Particularly in congress empirical research shows the parties in our government are becoming more homogenous in their political positions, while the differences among the party’s on policy issues continues to magnify (Jones 2001). In congress alone, polarization is visible by that fact that “since 1990 more than half of the congressional votes have featured a majority of one party opposing a majority of another” (Jones 2001). This intense polarization has had major effects on the relationship between congress and the president in particular. Looking at the theory of divided government it explains that legislation is less likely to get passed when the…

    • 1004 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays