King Lear Blindness Quotes

Great Essays
In this world, people become so blinded that they cannot see the truth or they make such foolish mistakes that they shudder when they realize the harsh repercussions. Lance Armstrong was blinded by his need to win, that he forgot that doping was unjustified, Hitler was so foolish in his war tactics that he led to the downfall of his regime, and people adore Gandhi for his freedom fighting but they forget he is the cause of the deaths and displacement of millions. The same applies to King Lear and Gloucester, both of whom are blinded by their children’s true nature. Therefore, they make foolish decisions which comes back to haunt them and help them realize their mistakes. In the play, “King Lear”, Shakespeare tries to portray the idea that blindness …show more content…
The Fool uses an analogy to tell Lear that he was being irrational and that he has made a folly by splitting up his land. The Fool tells him that he has lost everything and he is just a shadow of the man he was before the divide. This quote said by the Fool supports the characteristics of Lear being foolish and dull. The Fool tells Lear that he cannot tell the difference between what is good or corrupt/evil, he also lacks a good judgment on how to deal with his kingdom’s affairs. Lear is foolish to think that he can split his kingdom amongst his daughters and continue with his life. He does not seem to realize that his power and authority is dependent on his crown and without it he is a nobody. His decision to split his kingdom is the reason he feels betrayed by Goneril because he has lost all power and he is under the protection of his daughter. This can be rephrased as the ball is in Goneril and Regan’s court, therefore, in their favor. This can be supported by the existentialist theory because Lear’s decision to divide the kingdom and then to banish Cordelia is the reason for all the problems. Goneril was astounded by his action to banish Cordelia because she is his favorite daughter, this makes her wonder what Lear might do to her. She realizes this is due to his poor judgment, but she is shocked by how big of a fool is actually is. Goneril and Regan realize that they need to take …show more content…
Shakespeare uses the characters, Lear and Gloucester, to explain this idea because both of them are blind to their children's true nature. This in turn leads them to make foolish decision that in cause harsh repercussions. Lear is unable to see the true nature of his daughters which leads him to split up his kingdom, this is followed by them betraying him and fighting amongst themselves for power. On the other hand, Lear’s foil, Gloucester, faces a similar problem with his sons. He becomes blinded by Edmund’s persona, which leads to him getting blinded and betrayed. Their blindness and foolishness leads to the downfall and collapse of the kingdom. All in all, Shakespeare in the play showcases that one should not be easily blinded or make foolish decision because they can have serious

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In almost every story since the beginning of human history, storytellers used certain tried and true characterization methods essential to any story: archetypes. Carl Jung first identified these universal archetypes and tropes prevalent in almost every story since The Odyssey. Jung believed that these archetypes existed in the psyches of human beings, which explains why people recognize archetypes so easily when hearing/reading a work of literature. However, as time went on, people noticed these archetypes and fictional works started to look indistinguishably similar. Evident through the archetypal storyline of the “Hero’s Journey”, Joseph Campbell deems that usually all ends well for the primary protagonist.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The introduction of King Lear’s lack of sight was clearly showcased through his decision to disown his most beloved daughter Cordelia due to the fact that she did not upheave him with flattery, as opposed to his other two daughters Gonereil and Regan, who in true, had deceitful intentions. His negligence to those who tried to impose sight onto him, only led him to become more sightless. Whilst receiving insight from his friend Kent, he exclaims “come not between the dragon and his wrath” (1.1.124), which introduces us to his angry and impulsive character. He was blind to his hamartia, which consequently led him to his own destruction. After finally realizing that he has misjudged his daughters and witnessing Gonereil and Regans “sharp-toothed…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    William Shakespeare, one of the most famous and well-credited playwrights in the world, uses clever and intricate methods to convey his lessons. Specifically, his use of parallels is particularly skillful. In King Lear, Shakespeare reinforces and extends the theme of loyalty by creating a sub-plot that parallels the main plot. This is evident through the character development of Lear and the Earl of Gloucester, as well as the actions of their children. Lear and Gloucester parallel each other in their positions of unquestionable wealth and power.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Edgar is another major character and represent the virtue of truth and once again impacts King Lear’s actions and perspective, revealing Shakespeare’s message based on the power of truth at the end. Throughout the play, Edgar constantly disguises himself and deceive others in order to escape his brother’s scheming plans. During the scenes when Edgar meets with King Lear, Edgar is portrayed as a low person in society and an outcast. However, in Scene 5 nature describes Edgar returning back to his normal position in society and transforms from a poor beggar to a peasant with better clothes. Edgar is the only character remaining who is mindful and has full awareness of all the situations everyone experienced.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    King Lear and Waiting for Godot are plays that are very similar in a way that they have the same central concern of recognition within the plays. There are many different ways that the issue of recognition is shown; there is self-recognition, recognition by others and recognition of actions. Whilst these plays differ from each other in almost every other way, they do share this central concern. Recognition means the acknowledgement of the existence, validity or legality of something.…

    • 1860 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    King Lear Loyalty Analysis

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Shakespeare’s play, King Lear incorporates the status of different relationships throughout the play. Subsequently, many situations revolve around Lear’s naïve thinking of his relationships with his daughters and his kingdom. When ruling a kingdom, loyalty is expected from everyone under the leader’s rule especially by their family and friends. Shakespeare describes how easy it was for his characters to misunderstand what true and honest servitude, love, and loyalty are, due to their arrogance and ignorance. Essentially, Shakespeare emphasizes how false sense of loyalty leads to the downfall of power.…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Demonstrated in Act 1 Scene 1 when his youngest yet sweetest daughter (Cordelia) says: “I cannot heave my heart into my mouth” in response to King Lear’s demand for adoration. As a result, King Lear’s inability to recognise her love chooses to banish her and anyone who opposes his decision, emphasising that his pride has distorted his judgements. On top of this, King Lear’s distorted judgements are reiterated when he imperatively commands his loyal subsidiary to get “Out of my sight!”. This supports the statement that King Lear’s pride has affected his decision-making as he banishes his most loyal subsidiary after warning him to not disown Cordelia. Furthermore, in the sub-plot of “King Lear” scenes of pride are demonstrated when the earl of Lear called Gloucester, is approached by his bastard son with a forged letter supposedly composed by his innocent elder son.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Their tendency to betray the people they are close with including each other, is due to Lear’s inability to…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The tragedy of King Lear in Shakespeare’s King Lear, has a reoccurring theme of injustice as many of the good characters get taken advantage of and lay dead next to the evil ones in the end. The plot involves many injustices and events that would in todays world, involve heavy consequences and repercussions. Yet, in Shakespeare they set into motion the storyline as many characters indulge in treachery, lies, and misconduct. The main character King Lear who is father to three daughters in the play has several injustices done to him as his own daughters succeed in stripping his powers as king from him. They take portions of his kingdom to rule over and they condemn his ability to command his troops.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Manipulation In King Lear

    • 2072 Words
    • 9 Pages

    This is the case as both Goneril and Regan's death were a result of their own actions and emotions. In the play both sister both are in love and pursuit of Edmund. This love for Edmund is so powerful that it causes a heated rivalry and cloud the decision making abilities of the sisters. This rivalry is so fierce that Goneril goes on and foolishly decides to poison her sister Regan in order to ensure success in her pursuit of Edmund. This foolish plan might have worked except for the fact the Goneril then goes onto…

    • 2072 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Goneril being as conniving as she is, did not mean any of the words she had said. Regan also does the same by professing her love to her father and also not meaning any of it. The appearance of the two sisters supposedly loving their father is all a act for Lear 's wealth, in reality the sisters do not love their father as much as they say they…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Gloucester is no less a tragic figure than his king.” By consider the role and dramatic presentation of Gloucester in the play, evaluate this view. The story of Gloucester and the mirroring story of Lear in Shakespeare's ‘King Lear’ presents both men as tragic figures, although it is arguable if Gloucester fills the requirements set out by the tragic heroes in the stories from Ancient Greece as well as his King does. In Poetics, Aristotle defines the tragic figures downfall as something that “must not be the spectacle of a virtue,” meaning that the focus of the tragic figure should not be on the loss of their wealth and status. The figure must allow the audience to feel “pity” for them, pity for the excessive amount of punishment their flaws cause them.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many times in our lives we make decisions that we think are “innocent” and will have no complications, but sometimes those decisions create many problems that led to massive consequences. In King Lear and Babel, the decisions that were considered to be “innocent” led to monumental mistakes and many consequences. There are many terrible decisions made in King Lear, but the ones made by King Lear himself, in regards of his kingdom and daughters take the prize for having the most complications associated with them. From the first line of King Lear, we see that the decision of Lear deciding to divide his kingdom among his daughters was thought, to be honest, but in reality it was the decision that wrecked his entire life. The first mistake…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While I want to focus the play around these central relationships, it’s important to note that, in this tragedy, Shakespeare included a parallel plot: the story of Edgar, ‘sonne and heire to the Earle of Gloster, and his sullen and assumed humor of Tom of Bedlam’ (from the title page of the 1608 quarto of King Lear, quoted in Shapiro, 2015). What’s interesting to me is Shapiro’s interpretation of this subplot as a counterpoint to the story of Lear’s family, “a way to highlight Lear’s figurative blindness by juxtaposing it with something more literal” (Shapiro, 2015). Edgar’s…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lear’s hubristic nature obstructs his ability to comprehend with following orders, as being king, he is accustomed to give orders. Lear responds to being disobeyed through plosive derogatory language which is evident during the juxtaposing response of Cordelia as she cannot “heave” her “heart” into her “mouth”, causing Lear to respond with “Better thou Hadst not been born”. Lear’ loss of identity and dispositional transition into madness is caused by his possession of a delusional perception symbolised by the motif of the crown. This is portrayed when Lear takes off his crown foreshadowing Lear’s deteriorated mental state and complete descent into an altered individual. Without the crown, he is a typical man which is shown through the epiphany in the storm, resulted by his hubris and expectations.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays