King James I: The First Stuart Family

Improved Essays
Before the Stuart’s reign, the Tudors and English Parliament worked hand in hand. After Queen Elizabeth I’s death in 1603, the Tudor line was over, and the English crown was handed to the Stuarts. The first Stuart monarch, James I, started the conflict between his soon to be dynasty and Parliament. The Stuart family had a tumultuous relationship with Parliament during the 17th century due to the lack of dutiful rulers like James I and Charles I, with the exception of Charles II.
James I was an Episcopalian king who believed in the divine right to rule and did not seek assistance from Parliament. James I called for Parliament four times throughout his 22 year reign, and dissolved it once because he did not wish to work with them. James’ economic advisor, Robert Cecil, was a savvy economist who “replaced” Parliament for James I. James believed that his power to rule came from God, and is responsible to God alone. This belief is known as the divine right to rule, and James instilled this belief into his son.
…show more content…
Charles I dissolved Parliament 3 times within the first 4 years of his reign, and disregarded any advice given to him. Parliament decided that enough was enough and England was heading on a path that only went downhill. They presented Charles with the Petition of Right. The Petition of Right was a limit on the king’s overall power, and angered Charles immensely. Charles sparked the Civil War by sending an army to a Parliament meeting. The English Civil War lasted 9 years, and was an ongoing battle between the Cavaliers (supporters of the king) and the Roundheads (supporters of Parliament). The Roundheads, led by Oliver Cromwell, won the war and take control of England. Charles I was put on trial and was sentenced to execution for treason. Charles is the first of many future rulers to be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Oliver Cromwell is an important figure in English history as he held a unique position of ruling as ‘Lord Protector’ instead of a monarch. This could result in Cromwell being perceived as a military dictator because the legality of his rule could be questioned. In addition to this he could be seen as an opportunist for military power because his increase in status was due to his role in the army in the First and Second English Civil Wars from 1642 to 1649 and he rose to prominence after the execution and abolition of monarchy on the 30th of January 1649. However, Cromwell not being part of the traditional constitution does not mean he should be viewed as a military dictator. The first section of this essay will portray how Cromwell in terms…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    During the late 1600’s England was going through a power struggle of who was going to be appointed the next King of England after the death of Charles II. In the events of 1688 and 1689 known as the Glorious Revolution, Mary and Prince William of Orange took the throne instead of James II who was the brother of Charles. Those events resulted on heated arguments between the proponents and the opponents of those events. One of the people who publicly supported James II legitimacy to the throne was Thomas Cartwright. Thomas Cartwright was a bishop of the Church of England and he was a big supporter of the divine right of Kings.…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charles I’s abuse of power brought significant changes that impacted England because he dismissed the Parliament, created new religious laws that caused disputes and ignited the start of the English Civil War. Charles I often created new laws that were not passed through parliament and refused to take advice given by the members. During his rule he passed the ship money law during peacetime which angered many citizens. When Parliament disapproved of Charles I’s actions and, “…passed further measures displeasing to Charles, he dismissed Parliament”. The creation of this tax fortified his abuse of power because the English law prohibited the tax to have effect during peacetime; however, Charles I demonstrated he had the power to overrule…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Was Cromwell Dbq

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages

    providence hath destroyed and laid in the dust.’ But another reason is important to mention; indeed Cromwell was as we stated before an important military figure and the army which he described as ‘the militants as the core of those who were God’s people’ was his costly way to control people disagreeing with his government, so it was important for him to be in good terms with the head of the army, that is to say John Lambert, John Disbrowe and Charles Fleetwood. When Cromwell said he was ready to accept to be crowned King, they threatened to resign. He then had no other choice than to refuse the offer of the Parliament and he kept his title of Lord Protector. Instead, he took powers from the Council to be able to name his successor and declare…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mary also had a claim to the English throne through her mother's side. They were both powers hungry due to the fact they both had claimed to each other's throne and this made them bitter toward each other. Mary advocated for Catholicism and Elizabeth for Protestantism(Schlesinger…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the seventeenth century the political situation was very critical and complicated, the struggle between the political powers specially the struggle between the cavaliers and the roundheads was very severe. But sure am with the roundheads, am so convinced with their point of view; because when James I and his son Charles I, they both believed in divine right and wanted to rule as an absolute monarch so his view caused conflicts with the parliament, as Charles began expanding power, he asked for money but the parliament didn’t grant it to him until he signs the petition of right which limited the king’s power When they refused to give him the money again after signing the document, he dismissed the parliament, and decided to rule on his…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    King James Criticism

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages

    But James is not always praised and his criticism is often based on two of his policies: the Irish plantation and the reformation of the Scottish Kirk both, some believe, being major factors in the explosion of the Civil War in the 1640s. It is true that if James was a flexible monarch who favored stability he did tried to pass more revolutionary policies. Notably towards James’s other major source of dislike: the Scottish Kirk. If James did not like the English Parliament he was on the other hand very fond of the English Church. It was a Calvinist church supervised by bishops and had the king as the head of the church while in Scotland the Scottish kirk was trying to get rid of bishops and parishes.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Civil War DBQ

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Civil or not? The Civil War occurred on 1861 in America and was fought for the American people and citizens. Although the war was fought for the citizens and was named ‘Civil’ only one group of the citizens, either the Union or the Confederate, won what they desired. So was the Civil War civil? Between the Union and Confederate existed several opposing opinions, which led to the Civil War. Some of these issues were the different types of economic structures, perceptions of equality and freedom, and the conflicting viewpoints on states rights and national powers.…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    1625-88 Transformation

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages

    To a certain extent it can be argued that there was little to no change in the years 1625 – 88, however when compared to society in years’ prior there is a significant transformation in many different elements of society during 1625-1688. There is some limited evidence to support the view that there was little to no transformation to society in years 1625-88. Firstly, though the growth of population had reached its peak during the mid-17th century, this growth of the population had been gradually occurring since the country was wiped out by the plague in the 14th century. In addition, one third of the population was poor and though this could be seen as a massive change from prior years, these numbers were similar to the numbers of the poor…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The Civil war was an internal conflict fought among the Americans from 1861 till 1865. It is the most dissenting war in American history, also one of the lowest points of time in American history. As a result, it led to a total reconstruction of a better nation. The reasons for the war were rather simple for both sides, the confederacy led by Jefferson Davis fought for independence. While Lincoln, in the beginning, fought to keep the union together, as times passes, he believed that ending slavery was also another goal for fighting the civil war.…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the seventeenth century, Europe was undergoing drastic movements such as the Protestant Reformation and the Enlightenment. These movements significantly impacted a citizen’s relationship with their government, how they practiced religion, and their overall perception of the role and capabilities of institutions. Not only were these new ideas present in Europe, but they also diffused to colonies such as America. During the period 1607 to 1754, Enlightenment philosophy influenced Americans politically by causing colonists to view their government as an institution designed to serve their needs and ensure their natural rights, religiously by inspiring Americans to practice their faith without dependency on religious officials in societies such…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the 1600s England was very chaotic state. Absolutism was challenged and the people questioned who should lead the nation. During this period, Absolutism was prominent in Europe and the king practically said and did whatever they wanted. This caused problems when King Charles I came into power in 1625 after his father’s death. The problems came from the fact that he struggled to control Parliament and would thus defy them by doing things such as taxing the people without consulting them first.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In England, the support of Parliament was important to Monarchs. The Acts of Supremacy, in 1534, recognized Henry VII as the Supreme Head of the Church of England. King James tried to reestablish an absolute monarchy and as result a Civil War broke out in 1642. Oliver Cromwell come out victorious in the war, sets up dictatorship, and would rule until his death in 1658. In 1685, James II becomes King and names Catholics to high positions in government.…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    look at John Locke and Niccole Machiavelli John Locke and Niccole Machiavelli are two philosophers from the Renaissance period, who focused their work on creating a better society and government. Their work consists of theories of how rulers should rule their land and how they can get their subjects support. Locke’s Two Treaties of Government of Civil Government, is contrary to Machiavelli’s book The Prince. Whereas, Locke’s book is to justify the revolution of when King James II was removed from power, Machiavelli’s book is about how a ruler should exercise his power and gain control. Machiavelli’s theory is similar to dictatorship and Locke’s theory is the basis for classical liberalism.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the Elizabethan world view, life is governed by a rigid and God-ordained natural order known as the Great Chain of Being. Every aspect of his creation, whether animate or inanimate, tangible or intangible, has its own distinctive place within this hierarchy. It is therefore believed that any interference with this order is a direct violation of nature’s organization and, above all, an act of sacrilegious insubordination towards God’s will. At the top of mankind’s social order lies the monarch, who is given the right to reign over his realm without condition through the decree of God. As a result, any attempt to unseat or undermine the authority of the king is seen as defiance against God Himself, the sole creator of this ordered…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays