Use Of Characterization In Shakespeare's Henry V

Superior Essays
William Shakespeare’s elaborate use of characterization within the play Henry V. Proves suspicions that King Henry V did not believe the St. Crispin’s Day speech for his soldiers, but rather used it to further his own success. Shakespeare demonstrate this through the characterization of Henry. Shakespeare creates Henry to have characteristic such as, Henry’s immaturity, never to take the blame, his abuse of power through unnecessary games, and his deceiving and manipulative ways.
A characteristic of Henry, Shakespeare highlights throughout the play, is his need to assign blame. There are many accounts within the play where Henry is in a situation he could take responsibility for, but chooses to assign the blame to someone else. In Act 2 Scene
…show more content…
This is his claim, his threatening and my message; 115 Unless the Dauphin be in presence here,

To whom expressly I bring greeting too.” (2.5.102-117)

In this message, he states that the future actions of him and his men will be at the fault of King Charles for not surrendering. He repeats this tactic again when confronted with what is one of the last of the French’s attempts for a negotiation. Angered by their repeated attempt to negotiate he says,
As send precepts to the leviathan

To come ashore. Therefore, you men of Harfleur,

Take pity of your town and of your people,

Whiles yet my soldiers are in my command; 30 Whiles yet the cool and temperate wind of grace

O 'erblows the filthy and contagious clouds

Of heady murder, spoil and villany.

If not, why, in a moment look to see

The blind and bloody soldier with foul hand 35 Defile the locks of your shrill-shrieking daughters;

Your fathers taken by the silver beards,

And their most reverend heads dash 'd to the walls,

Your naked infants spitted upon pikes,

Whiles the mad mothers with their howls confused
…show more content…
Shakespeare’s decision to give Henry such a vulgar and uncalled for speech, gives the reader a new opinion on Henry. This is the case because Henry list all those acts that he aware are inhuman, and that it will be his men performing them. Yet chooses to the put the blame the Governors whose people will be affected very negatively by those acts. Henry’s persistent need to assign blame shows the reader a sign of immaturity within Henry. Henry seen as immature has a negative affect on how he is viewed as a leader. If Henry’s people, see him as immature it can lead to suspicions he has not grown out of his old ways. (His old ways being in “Henry IV”, where henry is seen often drunk, sleeping around, along with being a theft and a liar). Shakespeare strategically uses Henry consistent need to assign blame as a symbol for immaturity. Henry not being full mature gives an impression to the reader his old selfish ways still resonate with him. Demonstrating to the reader his actions and words, are in the end, all for his on success.
Another distinct characteristic Shakespeare created Henry to have, was his tendency to abuse his power, by playing unnecessary games with his people. The irrelevance of these games, gives the impression Henry was merely playing them just to prove to those people he is the king, they are only commoners. The first occurrence of Henry using this tactic of trickery

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    How does Shakespeare use symmetry, in which scenes or even people seem to be slightly altered reflecting the other scenes or people in order to make his point? In addition to the political quarrels, William Shakespeare has depicted several comparisons between characters and settings to mirror situations in Henry IV. King Henry has juxtaposed Hal and Hotspur, Hal enjoys diversions and humour whereas Hotspur is exhibited in a serious manner. Contrasted again, Hotspur is the epitome of honour contracting to Falstaff who believes honour is nothing.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry V told them that not matter what humility they were born in, today, would make them noble. It was presented that all men at home safe in their beds would, “curse themselves for not having been here, and think less of their own manhood when they listen to the stories of those who fought with us here on St. Crispin’s Day.” He presented himself honestly but still, at the same time manipulated the crowd. Not in a deceitful way, but stating his opinion or idea with power. Henry used his speech to not only persuade, but to present himself as an unstoppable force to other kingdoms so they dare not attack him.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the poem: Soliloquy from Henry IV part II, by William Shakespare, the poem consists of a varity of diction, contains imagery, and syntax. He tries to convince sleep to help him get some rest just as it helps others rather than him. However, at the end of the passage, he changes is tone of searching for help to accepting the fact that he can't find or help find rest. The change in King Henry's mentality is displayed by the authors choice of diction and allegory. The king feels sorry for himself the lower clasess are be able to sleep and that he, the king, can't find rest.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Such an attempt to veil political motivations can be seen in the Royal Shakespeare Company’s (RSC) interpretation of Act 2, Scene 4, directed by Gregory Doran. Doran’s representation of this scene serves to present a dramatic, visual performance, but also to demonstrate his shared perspective of Shakespeare’s political views. The characterisation of Falstaff as a static character is a foil to King Henry, where the juxtaposition is apparent between the honourable and utilitarian yet politically ambiguous figures, versus the vulgar yet honest ‘human’. Moreover, Falstaff satirises King Henry IV’s legitimacy and how he presents himself, as he says, “Give me a cup of sack to make my eyes look red, that it may be thought I have wept, for I must speak in passion...”, the motif of ‘sack’ being associated with irresponsibility and frivolity as a result of Falstaff’s characterisation. Furthermore, Falstaff continues the meta-play, satirising the King’s way of speech through his role-playing: “I do not speak to thee in drink, but in tears; not in pleasure, but in passion; not in words only, but in woes also”.…

    • 1513 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Powerful individuals represent themselves in manipulative ways, to create political situations that benefit them. King Henry IV Part 1, a history play by Shakespeare typifies this idea. Context has had an influential role in how shakespeare uses dramatic techniques to shape the characterisation of King Henry, Hal and Hotspur. The desired political situations manufactured by individuals in Henry IV Part 1 all stem from power, personal greed and pride. Those who seek power and obtain it through unjust means often develop paranoia, which leads them to manipulate political situations in order to maintain that power.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What ended up mattering most was Catherine. The goal of this paper is to elucidate these changes within Henry and those with whom he had relationships with. Concerning the war, Henry’s casual, careless attitude deteriorated throughout. In Book I, it’s apparent that he doesn’t care much about the war.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    William Shakespeare highlights enduring ideas about the human condition through the use of dramatic techniques in his tragedy plays. In his play Macbeth, Shakespeare effectively uses the dramatic techniques of character development, commentary by others and symbolism to reveal the enduring ideas of power, greed and ambition, along with its corruptive appeal; relationships and betrayal; and the common issues of loyalty leading to deception. These ideas are shown in exploring the tragic downfall of Macbeth. The enduring idea of corruptive ambition, including power and greed, is explored by the use of dramatic techniques of characterisation, symbolism and commentary by others.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Henry V: Rebel Or Rebel?

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Shakespeare’s character, Prince Hal who later on became known as Henry V, was rambunctious when young and courageous when older. As he began to attend to American school he was very disruptive during circle time, he would even wrestle with his friends, and break all the safety rules. However, the school system only rewarded students who were studious, nurturing, silent, ambitious, and well disciplined. Prince Hal was considered a rebel because the school could not find a way to engage him to learn. The school system needed to find a way to engage all students.…

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thesis- Shakespeare uses highlights of “manly” characters throughout a variety of scenes to define the “motif of manhood” as having very different sides at times between being sympathetic and power-hungry. Topic sentence 1- Macbeth’s regret of committing the murder reveals his manhood as sympathetic…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under Henry’s leadership, England proceeds to lead a “band of brothers” to win a victory against unimaginable odds while the prince of France suffers shame and his men scatter. Henry V, portrays the theme that the most important aspect of a leader is humility. Both the way that he interacts with his inferiors and the way that he trusts God instead of himself display the extent of Henry’s humility. The Dauphine contrasts with this picture of righteous leadership by using rash judgment and puffing himself above even those that are wiser than him. Shakespeare uses the prince as foil and picture of Henry’s former self when he was still a prince and relying on his father to show responsibility.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Infatuation with Power and the Destruction of Self in King Lear An ambitious nature is one of which is common within various characters in William Shakespeare’s plays. It describes an individual of whom holds earnest desires, be it for power, fame, wealth or honour. It is often that these characters are linked with destruction and it is particularly evident in William Shakespeare’s King Lear.…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arnela Hodzic Ms. Murphy ENG4U1 12/6/15 The Tragedy of Hamlet “No place, indeed, should murder sanctuarize;/ revenge should have no bounds”(4.7.127-128). This statement from King Claudius captures and explains a large amount of what occurs in the play Hamlet by William Shakespeare. Throughout the play the audience is forced to question and ponder what is going to occur next. Who will die?…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the entirety of Henry IV Part 1, by William Shakespeare, there is an emphasis on father-son relationships. The main protagonist, Hal, and the main antagonist, Hotspur, are both young men and as such they are still learning from their respective father figures. In Hal’s case, both Falstaff and his biological father King Henry IV, and for Hotspur, Northumberland. Each relationship has its merits and faults, and its own intricacies not seen in any of the other bonds. Though the the plot centers mainly around Hal and the king, each out these links are integral to understanding what happened and why.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The play Hamlet, written by William Shakespeare, involves many difficult decisions the main character contemplates in order to please his own motives. Throughout the text, Hamlet makes rash decisions in order to complete his most important task: the strive for revenge. Hamlet 's actions and emotions primarily revolve around the death of his father. This causes many people to believe Hamlet is insane. However, Hamlet believes he is fine and with his ludicrous plans and actions, he is determined to find Claudius guilty.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The impression we therefore gain of Lord Henry straight away is his sarcastic and cynical view of life. Lord Henry is an advocate of hedonism, i.e. he pursues pleasure as the overall aim of his life. Despite this, his character remains fairly consistent and tamed. While Lord Henry 's philosophy of hedonism would lead us to believe he would live a life of immorality through sordid affairs etc. we later find out that he actually spends his time going to theatre 's and perhaps does not live the lifestyle he wants to portray to others.…

    • 2395 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays