The impressions that I get about Christians, Jews and Muslims is that they all wanted what they believed to be the best thing for their people. They all fought wars against each other while they also benefited from each other. They all trade goods between then and help grow their communities and cities. Some were taken over and rebuilt and torn down again. The MUslims knew what they wanted when they invaded in 711, they most likely wanted everyone to end up being Muslim. In 732 Islam was stopped by Charles Martel near Poitiers, and Europe did not become Muslim (Fuentes 52). Muslims wanted to take over the whole area but were stopped.Due to their takeover of many lands, many other religious parties and countries probably wanted nothing to
…show more content…
If he has this on his tomb he must of had a good relationship with the different cultures. It depicts a man that only wants unity among the people. I think that he was most likely one of the good people that wanted to do good for everyone. At the end of the day each country does what they believe will be beneficial to them, and that is what happened with the CHristians and the Jews. Each one started to feel as if they were more powerful. “First Jews were forbidden to occupy the same houses as Christians; then Jews could not judge or bear witness against Christians; finally the pogrom exploded, fanned by envy” (Fuentes 76).I think that they all just got to a point where things had to be done in a specific manner and if they were not done in that manner then you were banished. Towards the end all three Christians, Jews, and Muslims did not interact in a fashionable manner. There was rage, envy, war, murder, and suicide. This is not the type of relationship that countries should have with one …show more content…
Each region had its own rules and customs that others might not be accustomed to. King Ferdinand did not have a problem with anyone, I believe that he was the one that would welcome anyone into his world and religion. “The Mozarabs Christians living in Hispano-Islamic territory introduced Islamic influences into the Christian lands of the north” (The Christian Kingdoms. 83). They all seemed to influence one another and did not seem to really mind each other from time to time. It seems as if they all interacted with each other when necessary and in order to gain knowledge, power, land, or whatever benefited each
If he has this on his tomb he must of had a good relationship with the different cultures. It depicts a man that only wants unity among the people. I think that he was most likely one of the good people that wanted to do good for everyone. At the end of the day each country does what they believe will be beneficial to them, and that is what happened with the CHristians and the Jews. Each one started to feel as if they were more powerful. “First Jews were forbidden to occupy the same houses as Christians; then Jews could not judge or bear witness against Christians; finally the pogrom exploded, fanned by envy” (Fuentes 76).I think that they all just got to a point where things had to be done in a specific manner and if they were not done in that manner then you were banished. Towards the end all three Christians, Jews, and Muslims did not interact in a fashionable manner. There was rage, envy, war, murder, and suicide. This is not the type of relationship that countries should have with one …show more content…
Each region had its own rules and customs that others might not be accustomed to. King Ferdinand did not have a problem with anyone, I believe that he was the one that would welcome anyone into his world and religion. “The Mozarabs Christians living in Hispano-Islamic territory introduced Islamic influences into the Christian lands of the north” (The Christian Kingdoms. 83). They all seemed to influence one another and did not seem to really mind each other from time to time. It seems as if they all interacted with each other when necessary and in order to gain knowledge, power, land, or whatever benefited each