The comprehensive examination of King and Nietzsche comparison. Both had complex issues that can be simply categorized into right and wrong or good and evil. King's nonviolent campaigns were based on the Third Model Transcendence. The Christianity teachings that emphasize the belief and practices. King’s civil disobedience towards unjust laws caused a lot of controversies. Nietzsche purpose was based on the First Model Materialism. Atheism inspired him to free human beings from their own false perception of morality. Nietzsche decided that all value judgments are based on random choice rather than any reason or system. King and Nietzsche mutually agreed, “if there is no God or higher divine law, then lack of fairness is perfectly natural.” King’s letter belongs to historical modern events in Birmingham during 1963, and the movement of America.
Nietzsche’s idea of conforming to moral laws and essentially putting aside personal motives of self-interest and pity. As well as, dealing with things in a way that shows wisdom. That also demonstrates a sensible rather than a practical idea of what can be achieved. Involving the theory of a subject regarding real-world consequences, because of one’s own behavior. Especially obeying the …show more content…
It is the cause of all emotion and is not only a strong feeling of displeasure against someone but also a natural instinctive state of mind deriving one’s circumstances. It is NOT possible to claim something is wrong unless you know something is right. Everything that we consider right or wrong depends on our mindset since childhood seeing and experiencing things. Our upbringing can fill us with false opinions, but it is also our own life mentality and experiences that help us determine what is "right or wrong.” Principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behavior are the sort of thing that motivates and shapes human
Nietzsche’s idea of conforming to moral laws and essentially putting aside personal motives of self-interest and pity. As well as, dealing with things in a way that shows wisdom. That also demonstrates a sensible rather than a practical idea of what can be achieved. Involving the theory of a subject regarding real-world consequences, because of one’s own behavior. Especially obeying the …show more content…
It is the cause of all emotion and is not only a strong feeling of displeasure against someone but also a natural instinctive state of mind deriving one’s circumstances. It is NOT possible to claim something is wrong unless you know something is right. Everything that we consider right or wrong depends on our mindset since childhood seeing and experiencing things. Our upbringing can fill us with false opinions, but it is also our own life mentality and experiences that help us determine what is "right or wrong.” Principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behavior are the sort of thing that motivates and shapes human