While at the metropolitan I saw other sculptures that were made of much better material and survived time mostly intact. While considering the softness of limestone it made me realize that its softness was also what could have attracted the artist. Limestone is easily manipulated and that was probably what the artist considered important. Technique wise it is very Egyptian in the way that the artist portrayed the Pharaoh’s features and showed a great amount skill because of how smooth and well done it would have looked when it was complete. One stylistic feature that is represented here is definitely the eyes. For some reason large eyes was something that I observed quite a lot in Egyptian paintings and sculptures. Another stylistic feature would be the overall size of the sculpture. Egyptians always made Pharaohs and god’s life size or larger than life size in order to show their importance compared to normal
While at the metropolitan I saw other sculptures that were made of much better material and survived time mostly intact. While considering the softness of limestone it made me realize that its softness was also what could have attracted the artist. Limestone is easily manipulated and that was probably what the artist considered important. Technique wise it is very Egyptian in the way that the artist portrayed the Pharaoh’s features and showed a great amount skill because of how smooth and well done it would have looked when it was complete. One stylistic feature that is represented here is definitely the eyes. For some reason large eyes was something that I observed quite a lot in Egyptian paintings and sculptures. Another stylistic feature would be the overall size of the sculpture. Egyptians always made Pharaohs and god’s life size or larger than life size in order to show their importance compared to normal