1.10I: King Afonso was concerned specifically by the slave trading of nobles, sons of nobles, and his relatives.
1.10A: The Europeans did not see nobles apart from peasants, the only saw skin color, which was an indication that they may be used for slave trade. The Europeans ironed both nobles and peasants, they saw no difference, because they were unfamiliar with African hierarchy.
1.10E: Afonso does not support the Europeans coming to his lands and complains about the harsh branding of his people, he says “as soon as they are taken by the white man they are ironed and branded with fire”. Pope Paul II sees the Native Americans as disbelievers, but he does not support depriving them of their liberty, rather he wants them to “enjoy their liberty and the possession of their property.” Both Afonso and Pope Paul acknowledge the differences between the indigenous/african people but don’t see their differences as justification for harsh and inhumane treatment.
1.11I: Cartier noted the amount of people coming …show more content…
Columbus and Cartier describe physical attributes of the Natives and their unique rituals and items/food. Smith does not offer his own opinion of the Native Americans, he briefly describes the color of their skin, and he only recalls the events that took place. Smith describes the Native American harassing him and charging against him and his men with clubs and bows and arrows. Because of this, he says him and his men shot them with their pistols and took their okee. Columbus, and Smith both describe color of the Natives in their own way. Columbus describes how the Natives painted themselves black, red and white. Both Columbus describes the skintone of the Native Americans as in between black and white. Smith says, “Sixty or seventy of them, some black, some red, some white, some part-colored. Smith and Cartier both describe the amount of food that they
1.10A: The Europeans did not see nobles apart from peasants, the only saw skin color, which was an indication that they may be used for slave trade. The Europeans ironed both nobles and peasants, they saw no difference, because they were unfamiliar with African hierarchy.
1.10E: Afonso does not support the Europeans coming to his lands and complains about the harsh branding of his people, he says “as soon as they are taken by the white man they are ironed and branded with fire”. Pope Paul II sees the Native Americans as disbelievers, but he does not support depriving them of their liberty, rather he wants them to “enjoy their liberty and the possession of their property.” Both Afonso and Pope Paul acknowledge the differences between the indigenous/african people but don’t see their differences as justification for harsh and inhumane treatment.
1.11I: Cartier noted the amount of people coming …show more content…
Columbus and Cartier describe physical attributes of the Natives and their unique rituals and items/food. Smith does not offer his own opinion of the Native Americans, he briefly describes the color of their skin, and he only recalls the events that took place. Smith describes the Native American harassing him and charging against him and his men with clubs and bows and arrows. Because of this, he says him and his men shot them with their pistols and took their okee. Columbus, and Smith both describe color of the Natives in their own way. Columbus describes how the Natives painted themselves black, red and white. Both Columbus describes the skintone of the Native Americans as in between black and white. Smith says, “Sixty or seventy of them, some black, some red, some white, some part-colored. Smith and Cartier both describe the amount of food that they