Kimberle Williams Crensha Discrimination Based On Social Differences For Women

2312 Words 10 Pages
Intersectionality is the interconnected ways by which various individuals. Kimberle Williams Crensha discrimination based on social differences with given societies. Far often many view issues as being singular. However, as more complex studies take a look in to solving these issues, the more researchers see that these issues are very much so connected with each other. For example, if an African-American poor woman is experiencing discrimination in life these troubles are not either linked to being poor or being African-America (Collins). More often than not these struggles are linked together to form a more complex form of discrimination. These differences act simultaneously to. Viewing discrimination in this aspect is extremely important …show more content…
Serving on a jury not only proved that women were capable of making rationale decisions, but more importantly that they were capable of holding up their end of the fabric of democracy just as high as men. Serving on a jury is an exclusive honor only granted to citizens, therefore by serving it is an implicit proclamation of citizenship. As women gained this opportunity for themselves it has only strengthened the status of their citizenship. Yet, still especially progressing deeper in past the 20th century the single most important obligation is military service. Military service in the United States has always been seen as the “ultimate sacrifice” for the country (Kerber). It shows not only the dedication to the long-standing values of this country, more importantly the willingness to put country before self. Women are now allowed to serve in the military in some capacities. Being able to serve has been crucial in strengthening their strand in the citizenship braid, however they are still excluded in other capacities (Whitaker). Often being excluded in these capacities prevents them from being promoted to certain ranks (Whitaker). Women have done extraordinarily well in this fight for full citizenship, however change does not come easy or quickly. This strategic fight has improved their status in many aspects however there are still many issues that lie …show more content…
In reshaping how future generations view women historical pre collegiate institutions around the country must highlight the various ways women have contributed economically, socially, and politically on par with men (Whitaker). This will not only reshape how men view women in various institutions, but more importantly how women view themselves. For example, men apply to jobs while they meet sixty percent of the qualifications, but women only apply when they meet one hundred percent (Paxton). These historical stigmas have been detrimental to women feeling capable of competing in these institutions (Paxton). Historical context has shaped today’s social context, which is the most important indicator of today’s assessment for our political understanding as citizens. Essentially, this shifts the ways in which the media portrays how women should act politically. Considering these media assumptions in the world of politics it makes it increasingly difficult for women to take roles in government (Paxton). It also influences the way women view their ability to be apart of a democracy. The film What’s your point honey? talks about how whenever the first woman President would be elected she would have to be the perfect women that balanced the expected gracefulness of a woman along with the sense of sternness expected from a male President. As

Related Documents