Due to the facts found by Mr. Robinson and the hearing outcome, he ordered that Mr. Sterne be restore to his original position and rank, and be compensated for any back pay and benefits that he had lost since his demotion. Additionally, Robinson found that there was irregularities with how the discipline was handed out and there was no due process and progressive discipline before demotion and loss of pay, thus Sterne was discriminated against an was due his return to his past position with back pay. This case again shows, specific issues with retaliation being taken against subordinates without due process and could actual fall into a Title VII Civil Rights Act case, but the District of Columbia has a Civil Process for adjudicating employee…
The Smithville Area Aging Office is in a state of emergency. The agency has refused to deliver services to Gay/Lesbian/Bisexual/Transgender people, and now there’s a pending legal class action suit filed against the agency, its staff and its Board of Directors. Its federal and state funding has been frozen and the agency is forced to close since it solely relied on funding from federal and state to operate its services. The executive board consists of mostly people who have some type of affiliation with the Christian faith, but Smithville Area Aging Office is not a faith-based organization, so when the agency refuses services to Gay/Lesbian/Bisexual/Transgender people, the organization discriminated against them as well as creating a situation…
I. Introduction A. Facts 1. In New Hampshire, every non-commercial vehicle is required to have a license plate that has a state motto called, “Live Free or Die.” The respondent, George Maynard who was a Jehovah’s Witness, viewed the motto to be non-religious. He believed “or die” part of the state motto went against his religion and covered that particular part of the license plate. Maynard initially simply covered “or die” part; however, as the children in his neighborhood continuously take off the cover, he tried to stop the children from taking off the cover by taping the motto.…
Maryland court of appeals ruled Wednesday that a lesbian woman once married to another woman had no right to visitation or custody of a young boy her former partner gave birth to before the couple wed. According to The Daily Record of Baltimore, the Court of Special Appeals upheld an earlier decision by the Washington County Circuit Court that ruled Michelle Conover does not have parental rights over Jaxon Conover. The child was born six months prior to Michelle Conover’s marriage to his birth mother, Brittany Conover and 17 months before their divorce. Judge Robert A. Zarnoch wrote in his opinion that current state law, governing the rights of same-sex couples is not clear and therefore distinguishes Michelle Conover as a “third party”…
Representative Julio Gonzalez filed a “religious” freedom protection bill that would allow any healthcare provider to refuse services to any person who violated the provider’s moral and/or religious conscience meaning the bill is clearly aimed at gay people even though the bill doesn’t mention sexual orientation. In addition Gonzalez wants to empower adoption agencies to refuse to place children in homes with two lesbians all due to their religious convictions and also allow individuals and small companies to refuse service on the same grounds. Gonzalez has already implemented this bill in Arkansas and Indiana. I for one do not support his bill because health insurance should be available for everyone, religion shouldn’t be used to discriminate others, and if the bill becomes law, these businesses would not have “to produce, create, or deliver a product or service” that violates a religious or moral principle held by a business or its employees. Health insurance should be available for everybody no matter the size, the color, nor where you come from.…
Article 1 In this article, it discusses Betsy Devos and her stance on LGBQT students in private schools. As secretary of education, she is supposed to make stances and affirm decisions about the safety or budget of schools. Her agency recently stated that they would not give funds to schools that defy federal education laws, but many questions about the protection of the LGBQT. Devos simply refused to answer the question as she would just state what she had said before.…
This statement is written in the constitution and that is the law. Now looking at both perspectives: Willock and her partner and Elane and her husband. We see Elanes point of view of refusing to do something that is against her religion. Now I 'm no lawyer, but I 'm pretty sure we have freedom of religion and speech. Understandable how Willock and her partner are upset as in their point of view they feel disrespected.…
The case was appealed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. There were a lot of same sex couples that had sued their state agencies in their home states to challenge the states bans on same sex marriage or to have same sex marriage available the way hetero marriage is available. The plaintiffs argued that the “states’ statutes violated the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process…
There have been several times within American politics where the rights of groups of people have been fought over. These types of fights have been spread over the course of America’s history the most well known being the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s. One of the most recent of these fights was the repeal of California’s Proposition 8, originally titled the “California Marriage Protection Act,” which only affected same-sex couples. Proposition 8 was a proposal for an amendment addition to the California constitution stating “only marriage between a man and a women is valid or recognized in California,” creating controversy between groups. The California Supreme Court saw that “limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples,” was violating…
The Marriage Equality USA provides a few examples of various expressions of hatred toward the LGBTQ community throughout all of California during the Proposition 8 campaign; however, Jennifer Morse would argue that the proposition solely regards marriage and thus is separate from hate crimes against gay and lesbians. In addition, Morse may counter with the example of a lesbian couple who "parked in front of a house that had a large 'Yes on 8' banner... [and] spray painted their own car to turn it into a billboard saying 'Bigots Live Here'. This would support that there are as many reverse-homophobic hate crimes as anti-gay…
Our book states that deviance is the violation of norms, rules, or expectations. Some of the ones that I am familiar with is speeding, breaking of the gender barrier, not partaking all of your roles in life. There are many other deviances that I can think of hearing about, seeing, or being a part of. Howard S. Becker said “it is not the act itself, but the reactions to the act, that make something deviant”. This important because just breaking a norm is not the only important factor but how others will react to it too.…
When the court ruled that Phillips had to bake a cake for Charlie and David, he did have his First Amendment rights violated. In the future, the court should consider a different ruling, such as a fine and allow people to run their business in a way that doesn’t violate the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act, rather than forcing him to provide the service. My decision would support the reasoning that people can have their own beliefs under the First Amendment, as long as they do not violate the rights of another. My decision would not force Jack Phillips to make wedding cakes for same-sex couples unless he is making them for heterosexual couples; he has the decision to make wedding cakes for everyone, or for no one. This ruling supports that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act are…
Why? Being gay is natural. Sure, moral fundamentalists may think it is a sin, but who are they to deny rights to those who are doing something that is just as right as a man loving a woman? Gays couples can be models of family life, offering just as much love and support for children as hetersexual couples. Gender should not be covered by marriage law, as the constitution protects US citizens from gender discrimination.…
Since the beginning of time, people have fought over their different opinions. With different opinions, there are bound to be a lot of arguments. Some of the arguments can be big or small, and other arguments people do not like to speak of. One of the most confidential is the right for LGBT communities right to be able to get married. This is an ongoing problem that needs to be settled one way or another.…
Marriage has always been between a man and a woman, right? Well, then what happens when you suddenly change the definition and turn it into a “loving, romantic union between committed adults?” (Vogt). It doesn’t work like that. It confuses society and children.…