Kim Davis Ethical Issues

Improved Essays
Kimberly Jean Davis, commonly known as Kim Davis, is the county clear for Rowan County, Kentucky. Born in September, 1965 in Jackson, Kentucky, Kim Davis has served as chief deputy clerk of Rowan County, Kentucky, from 1991 to 2015. During her time there as the chief deputy clerk, she reported to her mother, Rowan County clerk Jean W. Bailey, and was found to be paid much higher with better benefits than her colleagues of the same positions. After twenty eight years of experience at the county office, Kim Davis won the Democratic primary election and later on took office as the county clerk after her mother retired from that position. Before her international controversy broke out on July 7, 2015, Kim Davis had three marriages and twin sons. Kim Davis was converted to …show more content…
The opponents of Kim Davis claimed that, as a federal employee serving the people, she was trying to misuse her liberal rights of religious beliefs to only provide the service she would like to provide. However, just as Professor Eugene Volokh from the UCLA School of Law pointed out, state religious freedom restoration act in Kentucky might legalize accommodation for the personalized accommodation she asked for. Actually, as far as I am concerned, Kim Davis herself accommodated her religious beliefs after she returned to work from the jail. She designed new application forms and other documents for marriage license without any contact information of the county office. In the meantime, she started letting the deputy clerks of her county to manage all the marriage licenses. In this way, she herself did not have to deal with same-sex marriage issues. Thus, same-sex marriages got authorized in her county avoiding direct conflict with same-sex marriage

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Maryland court of appeals ruled Wednesday that a lesbian woman once married to another woman had no right to visitation or custody of a young boy her former partner gave birth to before the couple wed. According to The Daily Record of Baltimore, the Court of Special Appeals upheld an earlier decision by the Washington County Circuit Court that ruled Michelle Conover does not have parental rights over Jaxon Conover. The child was born six months prior to Michelle Conover’s marriage to his birth mother, Brittany Conover and 17 months before their divorce. Judge Robert A. Zarnoch wrote in his opinion that current state law, governing the rights of same-sex couples is not clear and therefore distinguishes Michelle Conover as a “third party”…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I disagree with the government pushing Davis to follow the law even if she doesn’t want to. Although Davis continued to break the law, no one should be forced to do something they do not want to do. If Davis did not want to issue marriage license to a gay couple, then she shouldn’t be forced to do something she doesn’t religiously believe in. The government continued to push Davis to issue the license, but instead of arresting Davis, the officers should have asked other clerks to issue the marriage. The arrest of Davis started a spark in the media across the United Sates and many people were intrigued by the situation.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The South Carolina State Supreme Court had found that the burden was on the state to show that they were not discriminating against the individual in a specific manner, and that their laws were not unreasonable or unnecessarily restricting on individual freedoms. However, the state contended that they had not denied benefits to Sherbert because of her religion or religious practices, and that Sherbert 's adherence to the Seventh Day Adventist faith was belying the point. Instead, they had merely utilized the same rule for determining benefits eligibility that would apply to any person who had applied for unemployment. Although Sherbert 's specific practices happened to make her ineligible for the benefits, the state had not set about to individually discriminate against her, nor was the state preventing her from practicing her faith.…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Obergefell v. Hodges Summary and Analysis This 2015 landmark Supreme Court case questions the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans and is the consolidation of six federal cases from the Fourth Circuit. In district court, judges found in favor of the same-sex couples. However, the Fourth Circuit court reversed these rulings and found same-sex marriage bans constitutional under the doctrine of stare decisis with regards to the 1971 landmark case Baker v. Nelson, wherein the Supreme Court implicitly endorsed the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans by dismissing the case (different from not issuing certiorari), tacitly upholding the Minnesota Supreme Court’s rationale that the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans is a political question.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This opened the door for change, and showed that changing marriage, something that had been around for ages was possible. With Obergefell v. Hodges, the concept of marriage was also changed, two people of the same- sex can now marry each other. The talk of making interracial marriage legal impacted how the ruling of Obergefell v. Hodges turned out. People realized that steering away from the traditional concept of marriage in the 21st century was completely acceptable and that same-sex marriage could be the next step. Same as in Loving v. Virginia, Obergefell v. Hodges also had a connection between marriage and liberty, which made it easier for the court to…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Social/Policy Implications: The Obergefell v. Hodges case is one of the most controversial. As is the case with all issues, there are at least two sides. This is no different as the Supreme Court received praise and applause for breaking a social barrier. They also received criticism for straying from tradition and supporting an undesirable group of people.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kim Davis Case Analysis

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The impressive recalcitrance of Kim Davis, written on September 3, 2015. The article is about Kim Davis, a devout Christian who works as a county clerk in Kentucky. Kim Davis refused to issue marriage licenses to same sex couples and was willingly to go to jail for her religious beliefs. Kim Davis was jailed on September 3, 2015 for five days after defying a federal court order to issue marriage licenses to gay couples. Defying the Supreme Court, in her plea, she states that she could not sign marriage documents for same sex couples nor would she allow any of her six deputies to either.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Civil Rights

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In 1967, (while many states tried to outlaw interracial marriage), the Loving v. Virginia Supreme Court case stated that these laws (outlawing interracial marriage) were unconstitutional. An interracial couple was ordained in a state that allowed interracial marriage, but when they moved to Virginia (a state that did not allow interracial marriage), the couple was charged with disobeying Virginia Law. Finally, the courts declared the bans unconstitutional and stated that marriage was a basic civil right of man, and it was essential to our…

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There have been several times within American politics where the rights of groups of people have been fought over. These types of fights have been spread over the course of America’s history the most well known being the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s. One of the most recent of these fights was the repeal of California’s Proposition 8, originally titled the “California Marriage Protection Act,” which only affected same-sex couples. Proposition 8 was a proposal for an amendment addition to the California constitution stating “only marriage between a man and a women is valid or recognized in California,” creating controversy between groups. The California Supreme Court saw that “limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples,” was violating…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    History Of Dual Federalism

    • 1288 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Supreme Court argued that prohibiting same-sex marriage was a violation of the Bill of Rights, therefore, it was unconstitutional. That decision required the states to comply with the ruling and changed their constitutions to allow same-sex marriages, even if they did not approved the ruling…

    • 1288 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Viola Davis Case Study

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Viola Davis was born on August 11, 1965. She was the second oldest of six children all belonging to Mary Alice (mother) and Dan Davis (father). Davis was born on her grandparents’ farm which was known as the former Singleton Planation. Her father, with completing only a fifth grade education, was a race horse groomer; while her mother only completing an eighth grade education, was a maid, factory worker, homemaker and a civil rights activist. Once Davis was two months old, the family moved to Central Falls, Rhode Island.…

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gay marriage is an issue that is similar to nearly every controversial issue in America History. Most conscientious social issues in America life begin with a large majority of traditionalists pushing back, then some dramatic event event will usually occur, following that public opinion will slowly start to even out, and eventually past actions/ideas will be seen as prejudiced. It's like America collectively goes through the stages of grief before we see social justice: Denial, a lot of anger, barraging, sadness, and then finally acceptance. Along with million of Americans who felt similarly, we saw denial in Senator Jesse Helms by saying that homosexuals were morally wrenched, and believing that homosexuality was a choice. Collectively, we saw the anger in families across the country disowning their children; similarly there was anger in the viscous murder of Matthew Shepard.…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On June 26, 2015, LBGT+ activist groups rejoiced as the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of legalizing same-sex marriage believing that a ban of it violated the 14th amendment of the Constitution. This didn’t help stop any hatred of same-sex couples and it seemed that the world would implode due to the court’s decision However, backlash soon followed, leading to an Appeals court, saying it didn’t violate the 14th amendment and many “Christian” groups saying the ruling by the Supreme Court goes against the bible. In the case of Obergefell vs. Hodges, the ruling has influenced the United States to take steps in a more progressive future where everyone has equal rights and helping America begin its transition into a more positive light with supporting this decision. Much of the backlash from this decision was due to these different “Christian” activist groups who said that same-sex marriage went against their religious liberties and violated the bible in Leviticus. Which is quite hilarious as none of them probably adhere to the teaching in the book of Leviticus like no eating shellfish and no mixing different materials to wear like a cotton, polyester blend…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But, the one thing that holds them back is the law. Many states in the U.S banned homosexual marriage due to the fact that marriage between man and woman has been around for the past millennia. Lots of people thinks that same-sex marriage is one of the reasons that and that it supposedly wrecks the balance between traditional marriage and the balance between man and woman that’s supposed to equally balance the differences and family to create a brand- new creation to create man and woman as one. Phooey. People don’t know who is able to enforce marriage.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Why? Being gay is natural. Sure, moral fundamentalists may think it is a sin, but who are they to deny rights to those who are doing something that is just as right as a man loving a woman? Gays couples can be models of family life, offering just as much love and support for children as hetersexual couples. Gender should not be covered by marriage law, as the constitution protects US citizens from gender discrimination.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays