Kierkegaard's Argument Of Faith

Improved Essays
The idea that reason is the primary and most appropriate source of knowledge is known as rationalism. This theory holds that knowledge should be determined by reason and factual analysis rather than faith, dogma, tradition or religious teachings. It can be clearly defined as a methodology in which the criterion of truth is not sensory but intellectual and deductive. On the opposite end of the spectrum, fideism holds that faith is necessary, and that beliefs may be held without any evidence or reason and even in conflict with evidence and reason. Fideism maintains that faith is independent of reason and that faith is superior when it comes to arriving at particular truths. Danish philosopher and theologian, Søren Kierkegaard, claims that the existence of God cannot be indubitably known and that the decision to accept faith cannot be, nor needs to be, founded on logical justification.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Clifford Vs James In the “Ethics of Belief”, William K. Clifford presents us with an example. The example tells us why we always need sufficient evidence to believe something. He says that no one should believe something from a gut feeling or something we just think is true without any evidence of that it proves that it is right. We think of this as if it were a joke because it may not affect us now, but if everyone begins to follow this it will be a big difference from the way we think now.…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander Solzhenitsyn agrees with Colson and Pearcey about the reality of naturalism in modern Western culture and provides catastrophic examples of the destructive effects that they assert to be the results of naturalism. This Russian author argues that much of the world’s wars stem from the people forgetting about God. He states, “The failings of human consciousness, deprived of its divine dimension, have been a determining factor in all the major crimes of this century” (146). The first example Solzhenitsyn points out is World War I. He sees no other explanation for the method of torture and hatred that led to World War I than the lack of acknowledgment of a Higher Power by European leaders.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the innocent were hanged, Elie felt enough sorrow to claim that the soup tasted of corpses. This is how things were for him, what reluctantly became natural. This beautiful novel takes Elie through history of the Holocaust, showing the effects of the Jews’ experiences. Elie was admittedly naïve and very religious. Although things do turn bitter when it came to the Nazis crushing him spiritually as his faith in God completely falters.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Doubt in Faith To my knowledge we all have something we believe in, whether our faith is in God, Buddha or some other religion, the choice is ours. It is also up to us to have complete trust in the idol, hence not having any doubt towards that idol. Shusaku Endo covers the topic about faith and betrayal in Silence. In the novel the Japanese officials test the faith of priests and want them to apostatize since they feel that Christianity is not suited for Japan.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William James', “The Will to Believe, James provides a defensive response to religious faith regarding W. T. Clifford's position in his essay, "The Ethics of Belief" (James, 2001). Within his stance, James suggests that his views have a somewhat broader scope that Clifford’s (Princeton University, n.d.). Moreover, that in certain cases, it is not only permissible but inevitable that a person’s passional, non-rational nature will determine that person’s belief (Princeton University, n.d.). In summary, James presents that anything that is proposed for our belief is a hypothesis and that any question about which of the two hypotheses to accept is a person’s option (Princeton University, n.d.).…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Clifford and James are two philosophers who have contradicting opinions on whether having sufficient evidence is always necessary to believe in something. Where Clifford believes you cannot believe in anything without sufficient evidence, James believes that if the evidence doesn’t point in one way or another, it is justified to believe something based on our will. I will be arguing that James’ side is indeed correct. In James’ paper, he provides concrete evidence as to why his opinion is correct.…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kierkegaard says “If I actually have a firm conviction (and this, to be sure, is a qualification of intense inwardness oriented to the spirit), then to me my firm conviction is higher than reasons: it is actually the conviction which sustains the reasons, not the reasons which sustain the convictions.” The idea that a conviction of faith is the ultimate foundation of Fideism, only furthers the point that a genuine and honest approach to apologetics must be rooted in the experience a believer has had as they have encountered Jesus Christ, the revealed member of the Trinity. For apart from this anyone could argue for the truth of the Bible albeit unfaithfully because they have not encountered the true and living God of the Bible. A Critique of Classical Apologetics…

    • 2020 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justifying belief and what is knowledge’s nature and scope is well defined by the philosophical stance of “naturalized epistemology” in that knowledge comes from the empirical sciences though it’s application of theory, methods and results. Knowledge comes from proving things. This is different from the classical foundationalism which asserts the need to basic belief from which other beliefs can be built on. This essay will discuss the distinctiveness of naturalized epistemology, then how it differs from classical foundationalism and conclude with why it is referable. It should be noted that both systems of knowledge have many variations and so this short essay is more a general discussion.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anselm’s Ontological Argument v. Pascal’s Wager In this paper, I will be describing Anselm’s Ontological Argument and Pascal’s Wager and then contrast the differences between the two. These two arguments help to determine the existence of God. There are three norms of belief: ordinary belief, religious belief, and faith seeking understanding. The norms of ordinary belief are based on sufficient evidence to prove it is true.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Clifford states that it is always wrong to believe something with insufficient evidence. This quotation helps to demonstrate the view that justifies belief depending upon having good reasons or evidence. His firm belief in evidentialism, which means without certainty and a solid basis of evidence and knowledge of a situation you, should never put fully believe it. Meanwhile reformed epistemology states that you can rationalize the belief of god based upon given evidence. Reformed epistemology use of both faith and minimal evidence to justify their beliefs is not reasonable.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This point leads into how willingness impacts understanding. People who don’t believe that fire and water are different, are not able to understand that they are. This connects to the existence of God, because,” if [we are] unwilling to believe that [God] exists, [we are] not be able to understand that God exists” (St. Anselm Pg:…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, philosophers have been known to use skepticism as a method to justify their theories of existence and knowledge. Such philosophers like Descartes who wrote in his meditations that by doubting everything one is able to establish a foundation based upon certainty. However, others philosophers like G.E Moore and Barry Stroud reject Descartes and continue on to explain their foundations and ideas on the connection between knowledge and existence. Certainty and The Problem of the External World are both works that focus on the notion of how knowledge does not need to be justified through skepticism in order to be proven certain.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The presence of a sort of tension between faith and reason has been innate to humans since people first started to question what the true purpose of life is. The existence of this separation could be clearly viewed by looking comparing Athens and Jerusalem, with Athens representing truth through reason and philosophy and Jerusalem representing truth through insights of revelation and purity of soul. Therefore, faith and reason have always posed tension by their proximity and their constantly juxtaposing views. Many view these two concepts as complete opposites, that reason is proven by fact and that faith cannot be proven. However, some philosophers have described how faith and reason can actually come together to come to the truth and how faith can be an extension of the reason that works to reach a higher truth.…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two of the most intriguing schools of philosophy are the two which deal specifically with epistemology, or, what is better known as the origin of knowledge. Although they are not completely opposite of one another, they are argued in depth by two of the most famous philosophers in history. The origins of study in rationalism and empiricism can be found in the 17th century, during a time when various significant developments were made in the fields of astronomy and mechanics. These advancements undoubtedly led to the questions that probed the sudden philosophical argument: What do we truly know? Many people throughout history began to question whether science was really providing them with the true knowledge of reality.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In order to believe in God, an act of will, a passionate and personal commitment, a leap of faith is needed. Kierkegaard leveraged on this absurdity to portray his level of commitment. Such faith does not rely on reasons and is hence resistant against argument and uncertainty. Ultimately, when reasoned truths seem to be only ever…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays