Keystone Pipeline Pros And Cons

Great Essays
Mahatma Gandhi once said, “Earth provides enough to satisfy every man 's needs, but not every man 's greed”. People in this world, even to this very day still yearn for anything they want and perform actions in order to achieve their goals. There have been several instances where we have failed to take time and think about the consequences and impacts our actions could have on society. For the past few years, Canada and the United States have started to build a pipeline that travels through both countries. This pipeline known as the Keystone Pipeline and it carries petroleum across the country. Recently, they have proposed an additional pipeline called the Keystone XL which has not been installed yet. The installation of the Keystone XL pipeline should be disapproved by the United States Government for it will bring both environmental and economic disadvantages, leaving our nation vulnerable
Our country’s dependence on gasoline has significantly increased as a result of the increase in global mobility, which is also responsible for the concept of the installation of the highly controversial Keystone XL pipeline. It’s path is located all the way from Alberta to the US Gulf Coast, the Keystone Pipeline is a 2925 mile oil pipeline system designed to carry numerous barrels of petroleum per day. The Keystone Pipeline carries petroleum from the oil and tar sands which contain oil, located in the Boreal forests in Canada, all the way to oil refineries on the Gulf Coast. (Davenport). Furthermore, the oil sands, which contain a type of crude oil are formed by a combination of sand, water, clay, and bitumen. Bitumen is a viscous liquid made of hydrocarbons and is used for gasoline and other petroleum products. Currently, more than half of the pipeline system has been built as Coral Davenport states, “ About half of the system is already built, including a pipeline that runs east from Alberta and south through North Dakota, South Dakota and Nebraska”. The construction of the Keystone Pipeline was evidently an intricate process, as a result, it was divided up into four phases of construction. Throughout the past few years, the first two phases have been successfully finished, while the remaining phases and the Keystone XL are incomplete and have drawn controversy. In 2005, the Keystone Pipeline was first proposed by a company called TransCanada. Subsequently, TransCanada submitted an application to the United States State Department in 2008, inquiring for approval to build the pipeline. The pipeline was commissioned in 2010 as they constructed the first section of the pipeline from Hardisty, Alberta to Patoka, Illinois. After the first section was completed, TransCanada started Phase 2 and 3a of the Keystone pipeline which extended the pipeline from Steele City, Nebraska to Nederland, Texas and eventually it reached its current endpoint in January, 2014. Even though they have been constructing the Keystone Pipeline for several years, there has not been significant progress. The third phase of the Keystone Pipeline, also known as the Houston Lateral Phase is still under construction and is expected to be completed later this year. Ultimately, the Keystone Pipeline’s main controversy comes from the rejected Keystone XL which is a proposed additional pipeline that would be built from Alberta all the way to Nebraska and would be able to carry 830,000 barrels of petroleum in a day. Although there are drastic disadvantages for installing the Keystone XL pipeline, there are some various benefits. Firstly, the pipeline will
…show more content…
Although the pipeline’s construction would create many job opportunities, the majority of them would only be temporary. As stated previously, the Keystone XL project will provide for approximately 42,000 temporary jobs. However, after the expected 2 years of construction, the pipeline is predicted to only support 35 permanent jobs, which is minuscule compared to the amount of temporary jobs. As the construction of the pipeline will contribute approximately 3.4 billion dollars to the United States economy, our country will still have spent much more. The Keystone XL pipeline have increased it’s cost by almost fifty percent. TransCanada says the cost of the pipeline has increased to 8 million dollars, which is significantly more money spent to create the pipeline than it gives to the economy

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    , Jade Begay confirmed with a journalist that over more than 160 protesters were injured and another seven people were taken to the local hospital. Many with a peak of hypothermia (PBS, 2016). The pros of building the Dakota Access Pipeline from North Dakota to Illinois will increase over 8,000 to 12,000 jobs (ProsCons, 2016). The pipeline will also help with the economy possibly earning $50 million annually in property taxes and $74 million in sales taxes.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though there are many reasons to support why Keystone XL pipeline will be a very good idea, there are also many reasons that support that the oppositions gave the reasons why this Keystone XL Pipeline will be a problem to society. A lot of people opposite this idea of building the Keystone XL pipeline, because they consider this pipeline will not create as many jobs as it is promised. “Energy and Commerce Ranking Member Henry Waxman (D-CA) went as far as to argue that pipeline jobs are not "real jobs" - a stance that several labor unions representing millions of American workers might be surprised to hear. After all, organized labor has lined up in support of this pipeline because of the jobs it would provide for union workers” (Energy).…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The media has capitalized on the attention that these protestors have gained by camping out and having religious ceremonies dedicated to preserving their water supply. While the pipeline may appear negatively throughout news sources and social media, the construction and management of DAPL has boosted the economy and provided thousands of jobs. Also, this project is continuing the United States initiative of becoming energy-independent. Reducing oil imports from foreign countries will boost national security…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is big. Canadians can be affected by this. People are demanding more oil some people are making pipe line this is a huge problem. This can spring a leak and the oil will go into your drinking water and can give you cancer. This is why I am on the side to not have the northern gateway pipeline build.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Keystone XL Pipeline is one of the most controversial policy issues in the last few years. Hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent on not only physical pipeline building but also on lobbyist movements to either approve or vote down the proposed pipeline. With potentially massive environmental effects looming, the battle between an environmentally conscious president and an opposing Congress has grown into an international dispute. Legislation for the pipeline was first introduced in 2008 when TransCanada “began construction the Keystone Pipeline after the United States issued a Presidential Permit authorizing the construction, maintenance, of the pipeline along the border of the United States and Canada” (O’Rourke) Despite Canadian…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If a considerable portion of British Columbians feel that the Pipeline will be detrimental to Canada, then the government should take into consideration their opinions and prevent the installation of the pipeline. As stated in this quote by Prime Minister Trudeau, “Governments give permits, but only communities can grant permission.” Without obtaining the necessary consent from the citizens of Canada, the Kinder Morgan Pipeline should not be able to succeed, as it completely opposes Mr. Trudeau’s statement. Although there may be an exuberant crowd of protestors refuting the pipeline, the motives of each protester may be insincere. Recently, an article by Danielle Smith has exposed various American Tar Sand companies of funding the Anti-Kinder Morgan groups with ridiculous sums of money exceeding $8 million.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Dakota Pipeline is in the process of being built to connect the oil rich areas of North Dakota to Illinois. The hope of completing the pipeline, would make moving crude oil to the refineries in the Gulf Coast or East Coast areas a lot easier. President Obama, in November of 2015, put a stop to the pipeline being built because of the controversy that it caused (Yan, Park, Ravits and Sidner, 2017). By putting an end to the controversy about the construction of the pipeline, it put a stop to the disagreements, and protesting over the project that went on throughout most of Obama’s presidency (Yan, Park, Ravits and Sidner, 2017). On the 24th of January 2017, President Trump signed an executive order to finish the Dakota Pipeline; however, the pipeline would need to be in agreement with the law before it can be completed (Yan, Park, Ravits and Sidner, 2017).…

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Keystone Pipeline

    • 2525 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The Keystone Pipeline and the proposed Pipeline XL would be an accomplice to the destruction of our planet. (“.. by facilitating tar sands oil production the proposed pipeline will result in carbon emissions equivalent to 46 new coal…

    • 2525 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Perhaps one of the most widely debated topics, in recent years, is the construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline. The completion of the project has been done in multiple phases and one of the last phases scheduled to be completed is the phase 4 extension. This extension would create a pipeline that would trek, around 2000 miles, from Alberta Canada to the gulf coast of Texas (Friends of the Earth). Since the pipeline would cross international borders, approval from congress would be necessary in order to begin construction (NPR). The two main issue points on the topic are the economic gains that could incur from the development of the pipeline and the overall impression on the environment that would ensue from extraction, transportation, and refining of the oil.…

    • 1549 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ken Winston, a member of the Nebraskan Sierra Club—an environmental group—boldly opposes the pipeline stating it will be one of the most, “environmentally destructive activities on the planet”(as cited in Sachs, 2014). This statement shows that environmentalists have no desire in seeing the pipeline built. They also have concern regarding the use of the pipeline—if it is built. A major concern is that “TransCanada forecasted the pipeline would leak no more than 1.4 times a decade. In reality, it spilled 14 times in its first year alone”(Wieners, 2014).…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jack Gerald and Gen. Jim Jones say in their article, Build the Keystone Oil Pipeline: The pipeline, which needs approval from the Obama administration to be built, is an opportunity to strengthen our nation’s economy and energy future. It can help the economy by providing new jobs--including thousands of new jobs to build and operate the pipeline and more than 100,000 new long-term U.S jobs linked to increased oil sands development in Canada. Having this built can put a divot into the U.S unemployment issues.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This opened doors to the insecurities of the Canada- U.S. relationship as well as questioned the rhetoric of the energy policy of the United States (Kalen 5). Many people were torn as to whether the risk of the pipeline would outweigh its potential benefits. There were concerns of the environment as well as the effect on gas prices (Terry 61-62). The advocates of this pipeline suggested it would secure borders as well as benefit the economy immensely (Slade 28). Although the pipeline would represent just a small portion of the 2.6 million miles of oil pipelines that currently exist, many have aggressively debated this topic for an extensive amount of time (“Keystone” 1).…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Keystone Pipeline is a Legitimate Issue and Should Not Be Approved The controversy surrounding the Keystone XL Pipeline proposal steams from very legitimate concerns. While the issue has attracted support from some parties, it is apparent that many, including environmental activists, civilians and politician have strongly opposed the move, but the big question is, what are the specific reasons is in all this? According to Natural Resource Defense Council, NADR a New York based natural environment gives a comprehensive account why the move will be disastrous not only to natural environment but also to people (NADR). In addition, other non- partisan organizations like the Friends of Earth have also voiced their opposition to…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever thought of how America gets its oil? Even though every day we use oil for many transportation such as in the car, airplane and jets, even in the lawn mower. Many times this just goes over our head, because oil is there just for us to buy, not realizing how they got there. In the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Ocean Service Education, an agency that enriches life through science talks about how “The United States uses about 700 million gallons of oil every day. The world uses nearly 3 billion gallons each day” (NOAA).…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To comply with the demand for more fossil fuels in recent decades, oil companies have been urged to search for other alternatives to petroleum production in addition to the regular on-land drilling method. Offshore drilling, the process of extracting oil and gas resources on the continental shelves of oceans, has skyrocketed in the oil and natural gas industries. Massive production facilities sit atop undersea towers, some descending deeper than the height of the world's most ambitious skyscrapers. Environmentalists, in return, lashed out vigorously against offshore drilling, showing that oil spills from these elaborated oil platforms can impose serious, even fatal, damages to marine organisms and habits. Despite tremendously fierce opposition,…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics