Kuehn V. Pub Zone Case Study

Kuehn v. Pub Zone and Soldano v. O’Daniels were both involved in attacks that took place in a bar. Should both parties come out the same? And if so, which way? In favor of the plaintiffs or owner defendants? Bars and saloons have been known to be very popular places for customers to get into arguments that can lead to fights or attacks, my personal opinion for that being the place of most fights is that alcohol makes men or women more aggravated easier acting more on their emotions rather than thinking actions through. In these two cases Kuehn v. Pub Zone and Soldano v. O’Daniels, both were customers of the local bar, the two decided to sue the owners of this establishment for not helping them by acting on the attack that caused them to be …show more content…
Pub Zone case, Keuhn, a customer at Pubzone bar, sued the establishment's owner for not protecting the customer, Keuhn, when a notorious motorcycle gang, which were wearing their gang colors at the time of being served at the bar, attacked him in the restroom. The court ultimately came to the conclusion that Pub Zone did have the duty to protect its customer from the attack as the owner knew that the Pagans, the motorcycle gang that attacked Kuehn, were known for attacking random customers at the bar. He ended up winning the case which will make it safer for future customers who decide to frequent the …show more content…
With Annie and Bart having such close co worker relationship, it would be beneficial for them to come up with an agrreement instead of someone being upset with the results of a