Beginning with Walter B Miller’s (Miller, 1958) theory, which is based on very niche criteria, lower class young people from the slums who commit crime. Miller (1958) goes on to dismiss any psychological or environmental factors as an influence to any deviance or crimes committed, despite those ion the lower class being most affected by their environment and being most likely to fall ill to mental health issues. This would provide a counter argument to Miller as psychological and environmental issues might be what is keeping the youth out of work and in the lower class committing crimes. Miller would …show more content…
Deviance is incredibly complex and does not have a singular cause or solution. Each of these theories focuses on particular acts of deviance, and cannot be applied to different acts, often ending with contradictions. Each theory has then tried to apply its reasoning’s to the much more diverse phenomenon, deviance. Each of these theories has tried to determine a single great cause rather than a series of smaller causes that adapt and change depending on the situation. A better theory perhaps would be to understand and explain forms and acts of deviance, rather than try to ambitiously understand it as a single