Kathrina Grosse Analysis

In the first video with Kathrina Grosse we see her utilize her surroundings, and make our perspective on the landscape around more fluid with the hierarchy or painting. Grosse uses a creative technique in the context of boat building. She uses these techniques to make monumental abstract sculptures at the Brooklyn metrotech plaza What makes her subject matter different than the others is she sees a bigger picture in literal terms, as in she takes boat building mechanics and how to make a painting appear in space. Her visualization of the objects she paints on are going to be a bit more variated and with sporadic waves of color. When we see her in the Nasher sculpture center in Dallas we get a better look at how she uses color. She adds layers of paint to soil as the …show more content…
Hamilton uses a lot of sculptures, film, sound even a unique mouth-operated pinhole. A lot of her subject matter will be linked to this idea she believes in “the fundamental act of making”. What she means by this is “When I’m making work,” she says, “there’s a point where I can’t see it. And then there’s that moment where you can see it—it’s like it bites you—and you think it might be beautiful.” In a sense she is describing the spiritual aspect of where she can’t see it but because you can its spiritual and everyone has a different perspective and view of art. One of her subject matter of choice is the mouth, as in she relates the mouth to the eye and captures the visual aspect of point of view from her mouth. Another choice of her subject matter is bubbles, one that stretch from the ceiling to the floor. The reason for this narrative focus is that when something gets very thin, for example when oil slips on water. It reflects a lot of color back on the surface. Combining both unique styles of the mouth-operated camera and the bubbles grasps a nice perspective on how you can combine two very different styles of art and see how it