I believe that it is biased towards girls and not open to the whole community so anybody could apply. Many girls can now afford to attend a school with this scholarship, but only for a computer science degree. A computer science degree is more male dominate so I see why she created a scholarship only for girls. Yet, she could have made the scholarship for both young girls and boys and have it be more open to the community. Karlie Kloss was also put on the list because of her beauty. Beauty should not have even been a factor of why she was put on the list. There are many beautiful people out there yet one factor of her being on the list was her beauty. Sciarretto also states that “there is no shame that she was selected because she is a model.” Since she was put on the list, couldn’t Londone Myers, another vogue model, be on the list too because of her beauty? Beauty should not have been a factor on why she was chosen for a place on the list of Time 100 Most Influential …show more content…
Even though she was denied the first time around for the Olympics, she continued to follow her dreams and continued to get better at what she was doing for a career in life. Simone Biles is an excellent role model for young kids because she fulfills different purposes in this generation. Karlie Kloss is also a good influence on young girls but she wouldn’t be considered an influence on both genders. She does a great deal of work for the young ladies in this upcoming generation. Although both ladies are influential in different ways, Simone Biles does more influencing for young kids growing