Karl Marx Social Class Conflict Analysis

Improved Essays
Conflict theory originated from the classical founder of social science Karl Marx in the 1800s. The perspective was generally based on work by Karl Marx even though several other scholars have contributed immensely in the development of this theory. He viewed class conflict and exploitation as a moving force in society. Conflict theory generally surrounds the idea that most struggles in society happen because of conflicts among different social classes or groups. As opposed to functionalist perspective that explain society as a mechanized system of interdependent parts that unify to create coordination and to maintain social stability (Ferris & Jill, 2016). While the functionalist believed that social institutions are put in place to work …show more content…
He believed that capitalism was an economic system designed to keep power and wealth in the hand of the one percent, while the remaining 99 percent are forced to tolerate a social system created by the one percent, a system designed so that the minorities struggle and never be able to move up the social class ladder. He believed that history is branded by economic struggle between the have and the have-nots. Marx believed that once the minorities exploited become conscious of how they are being manipulated and oppressed in the society, they would come together in revolution. The new society would be based on communism in which every individual would be live equally in the society and it would remove class struggle among group in the society. Marx and Engel idea of communism is that “class inequality would end with collective control of property and growth in size of power of the working class” (Essay UK). In summary, under conflict perspective we can say that the basic form of interaction in society is not cooperation, but competition and this leads to conflict. Because individuals and groups compete for advantage and power, there is always going to be conflict in a society. However, when a large group in the lower social class is competing against the upper class for a change, the outcome would often be a major social …show more content…
I do not believe that equal distribution of wealth and resources in the society is attainable. While the idea of communism seems enticing, individuals need to be able to aspire, dream big and bring their ideas to lives. This could only be possible in capitalist society, where everyone has to work for what they want. Even in a small cooperative society, there is bound to be conflict among individuals. We humans are always struggling for power; we like to be at the position of authority where we can always control things. Also, capitalism as an economic system is deeply embedded in this society that it would be nearly impossible for a certain group of individuals to revolutionize it. While the idea seems promising, uprooting such system will be very challenging. Equality in a society is unattainable as much as we individuals crave

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    It has created power structures and the workers at the bottom have ideas imposed on them, which they are forced to accept. Human labor will soon become superfluous by the perfecting of future machinery (Engels, p. 707). This will create even more division between the people because of the existing competition. This “now puts these individuals in a position to raise themselves into the ruling class” (Marx, p. 174). The capitalistic society that we live in has enslaved workers.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Further, borrowing from the Master-Slave dialectic, Lukács argues that the proletariat has more power to end reification while the bourgeoise might even intensify it. This contradiction of the capitalist society is essential to its decline. This decline while not really a transformative revolution but over time will allow the proletariat to rise in power. Therefore, class consciousness is the essential characteristic of revolutionary politics. The transformation of society through the communist revolution will only arise…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    His work raises and important question to Anarchist, if the state is destroyed how can we effectively redistribute power and ensure those who have power, economic power in Marxist terms, will not acquire power again? To effectively understand Karl Marx we must acknowledge when he expresses opinion of power or inequality it has always has to do with class struggles. We must understand power is acquired through resources in a Marxist society and be aware of who has most control over the resources. Elites use power in ways that reproduce inequality and block the mobility of those who are not a part of the ruling class. The class struggle is a result of conflict between two groups that directly oppose each other, the Bourgeoisie and Proletariat.…

    • 1772 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However without the middle class workers, the bourgeoise would have nothing to control. The proletarians don 't see the amount of power they could have united. According to Marx, the only way for the proletariat to overpower the bourgeoise is through war. The violent revolt against the bourgeoise will show that they no longer have power to control or protect the oppressed class, deeming them unfit to rule. Marx said that each nation has to deal with their own bourgeoise class and then as a whole, the class will disappear when their subordinates no longer obey or need them.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Laborers are at times dispensable and then other times greatly needed. In addition, he argues that there is a false sense freedom in capitalism. Workers believe they get to decide whether to work and control their own labor. However, this is false as all workers are forced to work in this system their only choice is who they will work for. Capitalism stifles worker’s true self and personal expression as their life becomes completely revolved around this system and earning a wage to survive,…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During this time, the elite: the rich, property owners, aristocrats were thought to be superior to the masses. This is exactly, the kind of society that philosopher, Karl Marx detested. Marx supported the lower class: the common people, the servants, the masses and believed that the masses untimely had the potential to rise above the oppressors if they would only realize their true power in numbers and could demolish the need for government and create true equality among all people. Social stratification and capitalism dictate the social norms of the time, but the human spirit often strives to be in control of its own destiny. In Miss Julie, money and social class draw a rigid line that Strindberg’s characters Julie and Jean try to rebut against but yet fail to escape its’ grips on their inner…

    • 1814 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Luxemberg believes in the ability to make gradual social reforms is the way to work towards socialism is a viable and legitimate alternative to revolution if it is done correctly. “The trade union struggle for hours and wages and the political struggle for reforms will lead to a progressively more extensive control over the conditions of production,” and “as the rights of the capitalist proprietor will be diminished through legislation, he will be reduced in time to the role of a simple administrator.” “The capitalist will see his property lose more and more value to himself” till finally “the direction and administration of exploitation will be taken from him entirely” and “collective exploitation” instituted.” Those who control the labor should not be the only…

    • 1089 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marx stated the division and conflict will be so great, and the conditions of the exploited worker will be so bad that the social structure would eventually collapses and revolution would ensue. From this ‘revolution’, Socialism should prosper, where we are in an egalitarian communist society where human need would be motivation for production, not money, and the very nature of ‘class’ will be eliminated. The state would own the means of production, and would equally distribute resources to all persons. Ralf Dahrendorf’s “Class and class conflict in Industrial Society” (1959) comments on Marx’s writings and worked to develop Marx’s class conflict theories and present his own views. He also calls his period of time ‘postcapitalism’, characterizing it as a fluid system of power relationships and a complex class structure that has made class conflict into state and economic…

    • 1873 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First one will need to have an understanding of Marshall’s definition of citizenship. Second one will have to gain an understanding of why Marshall believes that capitalism leads to inequality. Ultimately, there is tension among capitalism and citizenship because capitalism creates individualism that leads to a society where everyone must fend for himself or herself whether one is poor or rich. Also, there is tension because citizenship relies on the notion that all…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The proletariat have the numbers, and they certainly have the motive to revolt as Marx expects them to. I myself do not doubt the possibility of a revolution. In fact, I do believe that eventually the lower class will get fed up with capitalism’s systematic oppression and fight back. In that aspect, I agree with Marx. However, where I disagree with Marx is in his belief that the proletariat’s class supremacy—once won from the bourgeoisie—will disappear due to the complete change in production and exchange.…

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays