Karl Marx's Manifesto Of The Communist Party

Improved Essays
Karl Marx in his work, Manifesto of the Communist Party, states that the history of all existing society is the history of class struggle. Marx’s ideal revolution is set in Europe as communism is spreading. During this ideal revolution, Marx has two main classes, the proletariat which is the industrial working class and the bourgeoisie, the owners of the means of production. The simplification of class antagonisms is caused by globalization and industrialization. Additionally, in an ideal Marxist revolution, production is becoming revolutionized, as the disturbance of old social conditions before industrialization results in uncertainty and agitation by the proletariat. The relationship between the proletariat and bourgeoisie is not sustainable …show more content…
Iran’s main impetus to the Iranian Revolution is the oppressing of religion and modernization of the country from the shah, not a class struggle system. One thing that is different about the Iranian Revolution relative to most revolutions is that religion is such a important aspect of the society. However, in the Iranian Revolution, religion is such a big part of Iran, something that Marx did not account for. From the beginning, even when Reza Shah Pahlavi was in power, measures were enacted towards modernizing Iran and squashing religion and its influence by reducing seminaries, giving state approval over religious institutions and reversing the requirement that women had to wear their veil. This started the initial anger amongst the clergy and fundamentalists against the people in power about eliminating religion. When Reza Shah Pahlavi’s son became the next leader of Iran and the Persepolis celebration takes place, the fundamentalists and others are even more angered, as the Shah is focused on secular iran, not religious Iran as lots of alcohol and dancers are allowed, which is strictly against Islamic law. This isolated the fundamentalists and made them strongly against the shah, instigating the idea of revolution in their minds. This pattern continues as the shah sends educators out into the Iranian countryside and teaches the rural masses his pro-Shah version of Islam and states that only state organizations are allowed to publish religious books. Not only does the shah isolate the fundamentalists, but with the White Revolution, the landlord classes or in terms of Marx’s theory, the bourgeoisie are alienated as the Shah redistributed their land, angering them. Additionally, with the White Revolution, the peasants are still alienated as they didn’t have enough land to survive. All the women hate the reforms that the Shah has passed, so they

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The new dominance of the bourgeoisie created a social class within the bourgeoisie, and thus the proletariat emerged (4-5). These “wage-laborers who, having no means of production of their own, are reduced to selling their labor power in order to live” (1). The creation of the proletariat was a necessary affect to bourgeoisie’s approaches of production- a superiority complex and divide for struggle naturally came about between the owners of the production and the working force (6). The bourgeois industries expanded and increased their own capital, leaving the lower class unable to compete; Now and then the workers are victorious, but only for a time” (6). This dissonance eventually caused corrosion within the structure of the proletariat, and this struggle created the revolutionary element which eventually destroyed the bourgeois oppressors: “What the bourgeoisie, therefore, produces, above all, is its own grave-diggers.…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Everyone sees the world differently. With this, it means that every aspect of the social world will differ depending on the person. There are many ways to view the world. Some chose to see it in a positive light, while other believe perceive it in a negative manner. Sociologist like Durkheim, Weber, and Marx all viewed the social world in a different way.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thesis Statement: Marx, Weber, and Foucault define the state through the lens of class, violence and power while claiming that the state plays a vital role in organizing society, controlling the population and reproducing its authority. I will argue that the state is a synthesis of these ideas and can be conceptualized through its relationship with the citizens and its exercise of power. Body 1: Marx and his Argument Topic Sentence: Karl Marx conceptualizes the state in relation to class struggle and he believes the state exists to help the bourgeoisie gain profit. 1. Marx asserts in The Communist Manifesto, “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles” (Marx 1848:14).…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The last Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, had a solid group of supporters and a continuous group of adamant opposition. His opponents were against and hostile toward his actions and policies of attempting to secularize and progress Iran towards modernity. The fundamentalist’s of Iran vehemently disagreed that Iran should have ties to the West. To their dismay, the Shah of Iran strengthen ties to the West and particularly to the United States of America after the 1953 Iranian Coup. The CIA and the British were the masterminds of the coup.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cultures from all across the globe differ by the types of government from which they’re lead by. One prime example of this can be seen in Persepolis by Marjane Satrapi, where young Marjane grows up watching her beloved, modernized homeland get converted into a traditionalist Theocracy during the Iranian Revolution. This abrupt change in culture shows just how much influence the government has on culture in general. Throughout Marjane’s life several different aspects of the Iranian culture were altered as a result of the revolution and the changing of governments. It is evident that with the new oppressive government came many new changes in culture such as gender discrimination, education reforms and increased government restriction on western goods.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ali Shari’ati is considered to be one of the most significant ideologues of the 1979 revolution in Iran- the events that overturned the Pahlavi monarchy and ushered in the Islamic Republic. Despite his death in 1977, just months before protesters spilled onto the streets of Tehran, Shari’ati’s lectures and published writings are said to have defined the tenor of the uprising. In some of his most influential lectures, delivered during the late 1960s and early 1970s, Shari’ati attempted to fuse radical ideas from Marxist and existentialist traditions of thought with a religious nationalist discourse. These lectures were attended by a number of activists from guerrilla groups and are considered to have been the ideological source for the insurrectionary violence against the Pahlavi regime that occurred over the course of the 1970s. Shari’ati subsequently came to form a cornerstone of the myth-making that attended the revolution, with his image carried and slogans chanted in mass demonstrations.…

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Part A: Boyer’s (1998) article argues that the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx is only relevant within the historical context of the 1840s, and not in any other decade of the 19th century. Boyer (1998) then agues that the primary thesis of this argument is that Marx wrote this document during the “hungry” 1840s, which defines a unique period of economic collapse as a timeframe in which communism was an increasingly common idea in the development of European political ideologies (151). More so, the thesis of Boyer’s (1998) article seeks to defame the Communist Manifesto by showing its relationship to the severe economic events of the 1840s, as well as defining how this type of economic collapse was the only time in European history in which…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels: Bourgeois and Proletariats. "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles. " This opening statement by Marx summarizes his arguments in the first section of the manifesto. In this section of the communist manifesto, Marx with the help of Engels immediately creates the disparity between the two class groups; Bourgeoisie and the Proletariats.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the third chapter of the book, Marx explores the Communist and Socialist literature by discussing connection between the previous or concurrent collective movements and his crusade. The writers clarifies that the other engagements do not comprehend the importance of the struggle by proletarians. Marx states that the movements are encountering either one or more of the following challenges. First, the movements depend on the past social association to resolve their current hurdles. Secondly, the movements rarely appreciate the presence of natural attributes in the prevailing conflict.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fall of the bourgeoisie and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable” (Marx et al. 1848). This is stated to explain the power that both parties hold. The proletariat hold the…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Russian and Iranian Revolutions have very similar causes: an ignorant leader. In Russia, the Tsar was taking Russia into a dead end. His first mistake was to take personal control over the Russian army, which lead to the people blaming the Szar for every defeat that occurred in World War 1 (Class Discussion). Following WW1, the loss of precious resources and the sacrifice of countless lives lead to Russia to be in a state of extreme famine and poverty (Jerry and Ziegler, 1). The crumbling army, food shortages, numerous uprisings, and taking away people’s right of speech and press in the proletariat class lead to a very successful February Revolution in 1917(Jerry and Ziegler, 1).…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Mccarthyism Vs Communism

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “...history of all hitherto existing societies is the history of class struggle” even today this statement forms the fundaments of some political systems. The statement is from the Communist Manifesto by Karl Mark and Friedrich Engels. This Manifesto represents the working group. The major objective in the Communist Manifesto is gaining the classless society which is considered as equality between people. Thus, he was critisizing capitalism and expressed his concerned.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx's Manifesto

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Communism also faces a grim future due to the hostile environment found in the world economy today. The increasing significance of globalization has led to a connected world market. To be successful in the world today, one must adapt to the ever-changing nature of the economy. This requires research, connections, and communication that Marx’s system does not contain. A communist economy is built on production and manufacturing, but citizens are given little incentive to use their talents to advance industry.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the modern society Marx states that, “The modern bourgeois society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonism. It has but established new classes, new condition of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (204). With saying this Marx has then concluded the establishment of the great classes which are the bourgeoisie and proletariat. The bourgeoisie historically has made a huge impact on society as it is said they have “since the establishment of modern industry and of the world market, conquered for itself, in the modern representative state, and exclusive political sway” (206). They are constantly revolutionizing production as a whole even on a global scale turning cities into “civilisations”(208).…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most fundamental and important of these conflicts is that between the Bourgeoisie (those who own and control the means of production in society) and the Proletariat (those who simply sell their labor power in the market place of Capitalism)”. (Theories, 2009) One of the reasons that the philosophy of Karl Marx and Marxism is so misunderstood is the connection that society makes to…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays