Analysis Of Karl Marx's Objectification Of Labor

Improved Essays
Karl Marx describes the product of labor as not being strictly confined to the byproduct from the labor, but it is also the labor itself. The objectification of both the labor and the end product takes on a powerful role as it is viewed as “something alien, as a power independent of the producer.” In a sense, the labor that is put towards the commodity becomes something that is almost tangible and as a result, can be obtained “only with the greatest effort and with the most irregular interruptions.” Meaning with the worker’s realization of this objectification, the workers lose a part of themselves as they view the labor and the product as an “external existence” capable of confronting or controlling them; this is comparable to religion as man gives more “into God, the less he retains in himself”; From the comparison that Marx makes between the idea of god and the objectification of labor, it is evident there is a relationship whereas men continue to spend more time producing the commodity, it is actually revered and the humans that …show more content…
Furthermore, one could say that man is constantly battling an existential crisis within themselves and will always feel the compulsion to find any form of external substance to combat feelings of hopelessness within their purposeless

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Man is meant to work to satisfy his own needs, however now this work has been distorted and used for external gains outside the worker. This taints the process of labor which is a part of man’s nature, therefore estranging man from nature. In addition, Marx argues that man’s physical and spiritual life is intrinsically linked to nature, as man is a part of nature. Therefore, the estrangement of the worker to nature is in essence the estrangement of man to himself. This is because the worker is estranged from the functions that make him man, as they are distorted for capitalist gains.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx believes that goods and services is directly connected to the amount of labor required for its production. Most importantly, the two classes in society, the bourgeoisie(the wealthy capital owning) and proletariat(the poor working class) will forever be stuck in their same class because of capitalism. To illustrate such idea he developed the ideas of surplus values. Karl ideas of surplus values is the relationship between the worker and his product and the employer. Marx is saying that the worker will receive a salary of the amount of goods produced and the difference between the cost of labor and the price which the product was sold will be the profit.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    And this life-activity he sells to another person in order to secure the necessary means of subsistence (204).” Marx highlights that the worker continues the labour specifically because it is the “means of subsistence” ie. the only way to live. The character of the worker is one who, while hating having to work, continuously works because it is her only option. The second type of reproduction…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The separation between capitalist and the working class is unfair and uneven. To Marx, “If the wealth of a society is decreasing, the worker suffers most, for although the working class cannot gain as much as the property owners when society is prospering, none suffers more cruelly from its decline than the working class” (Marx, page 284, Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts, First Manuscript). He concludes that this makes a worker a slave to capitalism; his or her spirit chained to the robotic and mechanical motions of labor. He finds that these people become, “depressed, therefore, both intellectually and physically to the level of a machine, and from being a man becomes an abstract activity and a stomach, so he also becomes more and more dependent on every fluctuation in the market price, in the investment of capital and in the whims of the wealthy.” (Marx, page 285, Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts, First Manuscript).…

    • 1826 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I will explain Karl Marx’s conception of the development of the bourgeoisie, the development of the proletariat and where Marx sees this struggle leads to. I will also explain the bourgeoisie's relationship to feudalism. I will then discuss how capitalism has limited human freedom and what Herbert Marcuse thinks capitalism has done to individual humans. At the end, I will analyze Marx and Marcuse’s criticisms and I will explain my opinion on their criticisms. Karl Marx is an economist and a philosopher that writes about the bourgeoisie and the proletariats.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Karl Marx was a German philosopher, economist, sociologist, journalist, historian and revolutionary socialist who died in 1883; thus, leaving behind his legacy through his theories. Contemporarily known as Marxism, it is understood that “Marx holds production to be both the most fundamental and the most encompassing of human activities” (Wood, 1981, p.32). Marxism exploits sociological and economic development through his theological approach to capitalism; this is not “an explanatory concept” but rather one to describe and diagnose the ramifications of capitalism by examining its ethical parameters (Wood, 1981, p.44). A capitalist society defines a ruling class which sells the labour power of the working classes in return for a working wage. Further…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    “The Machine Stops” becomes alienated and fetishized as a larger than life tool that insures its occupants’ safety and security. Indeed, Marx states, “...man, by his industry, changes the forms of the materials furnished by Nature, in such a way as to make them useful to him” (1). Similarly, in both…

    • 2545 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Beginning with Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations, bourgeois political economists have theorized that the value is a function of a worker’s labor. In Capital Volume One, Karl Marx illuminates this idea and adds nuances to it, explaining underlying relationships between labor and value. Namely, Marx introduces the concept of socially necessary labor-time and uses it as a point of departure for considering the links between labor, value, and material wealth. In Capital, Marx elucidates the intrinsic role of socially necessary labor-time in a commodity’s value, then uses his analysis of this role to fully define material wealth.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition, the worker becomes a slave of his object. He first receives an object of labour, he receives work, and then a means for survival so that he can continue being a worker. (Marx, 1992, p.325). Through externalization of the worker, his labour becomes an object, it exists outside of him and confronts him. Considering that the labour of the worker is only a means of survival; it is alternatively work forced to perform for someone else (Marx, 1992, p.326).…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Midterm: Part One Karl Marx is known for his work on commodity fetishism. A commodity is an object considered to be merchandise or a possession. Marx referred to a commodity as having its’ exchange value determined by how much labor and time was put into producing that certain object or desired item. The fetishism part of a commodity is defined as the habitual act of characterizing commodities with possessing qualities that are human-like or larger than life. Marx sees commodity fetishism as people defining themselves by the things they own.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Marx). Marx argues that while the workers, like the ones mentioned in both works of literature loose themselves to the capitalist system, doing strenuous labor in exchange for money, money that is used to buy the product they themselves helped produced. “The worker receives a part of the available means of subsistence from the capitalist. For what purpose do these means of subsistence serve him? For immediate [664] consumption.”…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Georg Lukács concept of reification refers to the reduction of people to things. As Lukacs states in History and Class Consciousness, this reification is “crucial for the subjugation of men’s consciousness” (Lukacs 1923). Reification essentially objectifies and reduces human beings to things. This concept of reification is directly linked to Marx’s ideas about commodity fetishism. Capitalist exfoliation establishes the workers and products of their labor as objects.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx criticizes capitalism in a multitude of his essays, including the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. His critique of capitalism varies from the exploitation of workers to the instability of the capitalist system, but fundamentally his issue with capitalism is the dehumanization of laborers. Marx argues that under capitalism, laborers are dehumanized because they are alienated, or disconnected from fundamental human properties, in four aspects – products of labor, labor, species-being, and human-human relations. The basis of Marx’s theory of alienation is the laborer’s estrangement from his labor, which arises from alienation from the laborer’s object of production. According to Marx in the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, “the object which labour produces – labour’s product – confronts it as something alien, as a power independent of the producer” (71).…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most fundamental and important of these conflicts is that between the Bourgeoisie (those who own and control the means of production in society) and the Proletariat (those who simply sell their labor power in the market place of Capitalism)”. (Theories, 2009) One of the reasons that the philosophy of Karl Marx and Marxism is so misunderstood is the connection that society makes to…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The conflicting and perplexing observation that water, which is more useful than diamonds, is priced lower than diamonds was proposed by economists in the 1800s as a means of understanding the role utility plays in the demand and price of a good by differentiating between total utility and marginal utility. Adam smith is considered to be the first presenter of this paradox. The diamond - water paradox states that even though water which is relatively more useful for human activity (it is essential for human existence), the price of water is relatively low as compared to diamonds (which not essential for human existence).but the price of diamonds is substantially higher. In other words though the utility derived from water is very high and the…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays