Response To Karl Marx

Improved Essays
Marx Response Paper Throughout the ages there have been many differing ideas about the divide and tension between the classes. The eighteen hundreds was a time of immense change in these concepts. The philosophers and political thinkers throughout this time all had different ideas about the struggle between the classes, however, none have been as pronounced and as long- lasting as the ideas of Karl Marx. However, prior to understanding the opinion surrounding his positions it is first crucial to understand his background and beliefs. Karl Marx was born on May 5, 1818 in Prussia into a prominent family (Leedham). While at the University of Berlin, Marx became associated with a group known as The Young Hegelians (Leedham). This was as group …show more content…
The main goal of his works was to expose the inherent contradictions of liberal capitalism (Leedham). He believed that capitalism lead to the subjugation and alienation of mankind (Leedham). Capitalism, for Marx, was defined by the mode of production, or the economic system (Leedham). In capitalism there is a small group of owners, known as the Bourgeoisie, who control the means of production as well as the labor force (Leedham). This labor force, the Proletariat, must sell their labor to produce objects that will be sold on the market (Leedham). The reason that capitalism is so significant is due to Marx’s belief in the importance of the base, the economic system of the society (Leedham). The base of a society affects the political, social, legal, religious, and philosophical aspects of a society (Leedham). These parts are known as the superstructure (Leedham). These are all parts of Marx’s …show more content…
His works present aspects that when applied do not necessarily align with the modern world. In his discussion of the base and the superstructure, Marx argues that economic system, or the base, is the only thing that can shape the rest of society. This, however, is not the case. While economics does have a strong role in society it is not the only thing that influences society. In America the political system attempts to block the influence of economics in other aspects of our society. While some corruption does still occur in our system; in most cases there is a loss of influence in parts of our society. Additionally, Marx’s concepts of the means and mode of production are also not equivocal to today’s modern society. In the eighteen hundreds the main force of labor in factories was the poor who needed work. In today’s society, the main means of production has become more technological driven. The development of technology has led to the almost destruction of the factory worker as they are only needed for menial jobs. While the means and mode of production still exist what they are has changed. Moreover, Marx argues that the revolution will begin with a class struggle and when the proletariat comes together and forms a class consciousness. In America, this has already occurred with the formation of labor unions. Workers have come together and formed groups to gain their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Marx argued that the bourgeoisie controlled the means of production, wage labour and amassed majority of the wealth as a result, which equated to the power to dominate and define society. The opposing end, the proletariat, were constantly oppressed and left alienated because they maintained no power or ability to rectify their position within society. In addition, specifically within a capitalistic society, there was no opportunity for a meritocracy; so even if the proletariats were highly skilled, they remained pigeonholed with no chance for social mobility without a direct shift within the economic structure of society. When examining this multifarious relationship, Marx asserted in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, “The modern bourgeoisie society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (Marx.)…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mccarthyism Vs Marxism

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the Communist Manifesto Marx explained the historical class struggles that each society has come across since the beginning of time. Class resemblances are usually, the oppressor and the oppressed on opposite sides and classes with various orders of complicated arrangements (p.15). Marx’s believed that his society has not left the class antagonism from earlier times such as the Ancient Roman’s, however, enforced new classes with new conditions and struggles for the oppressed individuals, in place of the old policies (p.15). In Communist Manifesto Marx noted the two classes of his society were the bourgeoisie and proletariats (p.16). Quite simply, the bourgeoisie were the capitalists who were the enforcers and owners of the properties in…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This German philosopher was in the midst of many revolutions throughout his time. At one point, he was known as the spokesman of the ‘Communist Party’ in 1848, which signifies the kind of involvement he was intervened within at the time. Although Marx was a member of a wealthy family in which he utilized to acquire good education, he was a philosopher who critiqued capitalism. Marx attacks the bourgeoisie families and individuals who happened to be property owners or factory occupants, and critiqued these families and individuals because he believed as property owners; they would need to hire people in order to operate the property. His idea of discarding the middle class was revealed in the third idea of his book The Communist Manifesto.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Communist Manifesto states that she struggle between the working class and the bourgeoisie always results in a revolution and eventual “ruin of the contending classes” (1). Marx clearly states that the…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carlyle Vs. Marx

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Workers in a capitalistic society are destined to ultimately be destroyed and no longer viewed as a human with equal rights under God’s law (Marx, p. 23-24, 1844). Then and now people are reduced to being seen only as a tool that goes to the repair shop (Cortes, 9 Sept., 2016). The idea that the rich owe nothing more to the poor but the agreed upon wages, no more and no less just like paying for a calculator (Carlyle, p.146-147, 1843). That even their impending death does not entitle them to some kind of help beyond a contract (Carlyle p. 150, 1843).…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through the concept of a civil society, this idea embraces the inevitability of change as individuals adapt as these productive forces continue to develop. Through his writing, Karl Marx speculates that “[h]istory is nothing but the succession of the separate generations” that has exploited the result of the productive forces handed down from preceding generations material that includes material and capital funds. However, individuals will “[continue their] traditional activity in completely changed circumstances [while modifying] the old circumstances with a completely changed activity” (Marx, 16.) As Marx, uses the concept of labor as a basic, consistent element of society, people will socially adapt as they relate to one another through the productive forces that establishes community and labor. All in all, both of the authors address how social change in a society pertains to their theories as they each address within a society.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dissent from Capitalism “What does this accusation amount to? The history of all past society is the history of class antagonisms, which took different forms in different epochs” (Blaisdell 140-141). Karl Marx made an accusation that capitalism will eventually come to an end.…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism In Fight Club

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Given this power struggle class conflict is inherent. Marx’s critique of capitalism speculates that the proletariats…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx And Engels Analysis

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Elsewhere in his critique of political economy, Marx…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His readers learn that they are capable of constructing a new societal structure to replace the existing system once it has stopped serving to benefit them. Marx demonstrates this idea by explaining how the bourgeois came into power arising out of the feudal system, and how inevitably the proletariat class would do the same to change their society and erase the bourgeois class. “The feudal relations of property became no longer compatible with the already developed productive forces… Into their place stepped free competition,...and political sway of the bourgeois class” (Marx 296). He teaches his readers that once the community ceased to be mutually beneficial, they are able to adapt and replace the current civilization with a new one. Marx’s writing in “The Communist Manifesto” calls for a complete overthrow of the existing capitalist system through a revolution of the proletariat.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx presented Marxism as a way of understanding class divisions in the world that were based on the emphasis on materialism. Marx proposed a society without money or class divisions, diminishing the idea of materialism and capitalism, instead offering that equality in a society is based on how a society is run. Marx’s claims stemmed from an ideological perspective that individuals are more inclined to their wants instead of their needs, he offers that a society must work in a way where not just one individual but an entire society must give what they can to their state or government and take what they need not what they want. Doing this, Marx argues, will remove class conflict and monetary disparities. Marx idealized a utopia of equality for all, not just a certain few.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Merriam-Webster defines capitalism as “an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market”. Karl Marx was a socialist, born in Prussia in 1818. He is considered by many to be the father of modern day communism. Marx and his followers were very critical of capitalism for three main reasons. This essay will distinguish and evaluate the three Marxist critiques of capitalism.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxism in The Hunger Games If there is any perfect representation of Marxism in film it is in The Hunger Games. For this case study, I will be focusing on the first movie of the trilogy. This paper will overview the way Marxism is shown in The Hunger Games using a few examples from the movie. In this paper, I argue that The Hunger Games’ plot line has Marxism theories extremely exposed and almost blatantly exposed. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels developed Marxism in the early 1900s.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most fundamental and important of these conflicts is that between the Bourgeoisie (those who own and control the means of production in society) and the Proletariat (those who simply sell their labor power in the market place of Capitalism)”. (Theories, 2009) One of the reasons that the philosophy of Karl Marx and Marxism is so misunderstood is the connection that society makes to…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Their system of administration combined both their own as well as Roman elements. The new social order saw the dominance of the military commander, who became the monarch & a new nobility, drawn from warriors and an educated, Romanised elite. Peasants, who constituted their armies, became impoverished due to continual warfare. This led to their enserfment to feudal lords. There existed 2 kinds of groupings in feudal Europe- serfs and lords in villages and craftsmen & journeymen or apprenti who were part of the guild organization in towns.…

    • 2286 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays