Marx's Why The Rich Are Getting Richer And The Poor, Poorer

Improved Essays
Labor
(Marx Vs. Reich) The way businesses and factories should be ran has been a debate since they started. Obviously, there are general ways work places should be ran or else business owners wouldn’t have workers. A main reason different countries run their businesses differently is how they run their country as a whole. A communist country is going to have different rules and procedures in a work place than a capitalist country. “One should add that labour is not the only source of material wealth. We also receive the proceeds of nature as a free gift, which also contributes to the wealth of society.” (Postone) Karl Marx lived in communist Germany and had many views concerning labor in his book The Communist Manifesto. Robert Reich, American born, also had strong economic views in his book, Why the Rich are Getting Richer and the Poor, Poorer. Marx and Reich views are quite different, Marx would have had several remarks on Reich’s Why the Rich are Getting Richer and the Poor, Poorer.
…show more content…
The two authors have both a similar and very different view of labor and economics. Considering Marx is from Germany, he has strong views. He is obviously, the communist/socialist. His basic belief is that wealth is the direct result of labor. He believes that what you put in is what you get out. Marx also believed that the amount of labor put in determined the value. “Initially, the labour theory of value was a very useful weapon to the rising bourgeoisie, when, as a progressive class, they used it to strike blows against the politically powerful landowning class.” (Friedrich) Reich’s more capitalist American view was focused on everyone being equal. He takes the capitalist route by believing in paying the workers all equally no matter how much is produced from each person. Clearly, they both have quite different views that would be debated by both

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Smith and Marx created the industrial revolution and they have some similar ideas and have different ideas of our economy. Smith and Marx only in common was the creation of the industrial revolution. These two economies guys do not have much common, in fact that they have the opposite ideas from another. Smith ideas is the Laisser-faire where the economy is not to have the government be involved with it and he think the economy will fix itself that is the visible hand.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Karl Marx’s view of private property is significantly differently than what we view as private property today. He believed that private property was ownership of productive property. This is property that is producing a profit for the owner. Marx felt that government should control property and that all should share in the work and reward of the property. Whereas men like John Locke and Thomas Jefferson believed that ownership of property was for important for a good government.…

    • 95 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This German philosopher was in the midst of many revolutions throughout his time. At one point, he was known as the spokesman of the ‘Communist Party’ in 1848, which signifies the kind of involvement he was intervened within at the time. Although Marx was a member of a wealthy family in which he utilized to acquire good education, he was a philosopher who critiqued capitalism. Marx attacks the bourgeoisie families and individuals who happened to be property owners or factory occupants, and critiqued these families and individuals because he believed as property owners; they would need to hire people in order to operate the property. His idea of discarding the middle class was revealed in the third idea of his book The Communist Manifesto.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx believed that a violent overthrow of capitalism would lead to international socialism based on common ownership of land and capital. This would transform into an ideal state of communism, which is a worker-governed society based on the guiding concept “from each according to ability, and to each according to need” (Bolotta, Hawkes, Mahoney, Piper, 2002, pg. 58). This theory influenced many revolutions that would take place in the world. For example, the Russian Revolution in 1917, led by Lenin who said he has the philosophical heir to Marx (Schaff, 2009). Both Marx and Lenin are considered to be the two most important figures in the development of communism in the Soviet Union.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Vinnie Demore Professor Marzi History 1050-02 23 September 2016 The Working Man During the 1800’s The industrial Revolution was a big change in history. It began in England in 1760’s to about 1840.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    His ideas like the invisible hand and trade thrive of self-interest and how everyone benefits from this it is used as a foundation throughout his concepts in economics. Conversely, Marx has a clear focus on social classes and puts particular focus on the workers being mistreated by the capitalist class and how eventually society would be classless and this would be the most ideal situation. There is also a clear historical difference between the two economists which may have affected their views. Smith was grew up during the industrial revolution Routh explains that this may had effect on him it states ‘growth and importance were clearly delineated in the lifetime of Adam Smith’. It shows the early positives of capitalism and highlights success.…

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx believes that as long as man works according to his ability, he should earn the same as those who are more able than he is. I do not agree with Marx’s beliefs that when man works according to his ability he will earn as much as those who are more skilled than him. Just because a person may work the same amount as their fellow co-workers does not mean that worker produces the same results as his peers. When Marx thinks that “a worker should not only earn the same as her colleagues, if she works according to her ability, but also earn according to her needs” (Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich. “The Communist Manifesto”.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Smith and Marx’s views on the division of labor lead to their different conclusions about money.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believed that we do not really choose what class we are born into, which in turn, coerces us into the forced division of labor. He believed that it was not possible to have inequality, to have capitalism, and still have a stable society because capitalism thrives off of exploitation. “The bourgeoisie cannot exist without constantly revolutionizing the instruments of production, and thereby the relations of…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robert B. Reich wrote, "Why the Rich are getting Richer and the Poor, Poorer" to classify American workers so people could understand where they might be placed in an economical vessel. He splits all occupations figuratively, into three boats. The first group is industrial workers, the second in-person servers and retail, and the third but not last symbolic analyst. By splitting the jobs into these three simple titles, Reich does not give us too much room to justify where we might stand or want to be. Reich is persistently explaining each job category as boats.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx's Division Of Labor

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Pages

    I believe that Marx is an extension of Smith because Marx, just like Smith, did accede that there were benefits to the concept of division of labor. Unlike Smith though, Marx felt that through the utilization of this practice would be more of an inimical experience to the person and would make the person respond as a robotic machine and demoralize their humanity. Smith also believed that practices of division of labor would establish product being produced at a more voluminous number and more adequately. Whereas, Marx did also concur that it would, but in the long run it would over tax the human with human organs, force him to work in a robotic like manner, and then the human being would loose of sense of who they were as a person. Together,…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marx Wage Labour Analysis

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    What is Marx’s concept of ‘Wage Labour’ and the relationship of the worker to the capitalist, as he describes it in ‘Wage Labour and Capital’? I believe that Marx’s concept on ‘Wage Labour’ is the amount of value received in the work that was carried out. The wage that is given to the worker is the amount of money that is paid by the capitalist who is the boss, who then gives that money to the labourers which are the workers. Marx explains the key concepts of a ‘Wage’ and he also compares the difference between the labourer and a capitalist. Marx also questions the realistic activity, by informing us about the power of current working class, and also the capitalist and the possessor.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Happiness is an emotion that is typically explored by psychologists. This can be studied by sociologists too. Sociologists have developed theories that explain responses based on group dynamics. Karl Marx and C. Wright Mills both have a view on society based on the class system. Marx developed his theory based on power within the capitalist system.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxism in The Hunger Games If there is any perfect representation of Marxism in film it is in The Hunger Games. For this case study, I will be focusing on the first movie of the trilogy. This paper will overview the way Marxism is shown in The Hunger Games using a few examples from the movie. In this paper, I argue that The Hunger Games’ plot line has Marxism theories extremely exposed and almost blatantly exposed. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels developed Marxism in the early 1900s.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is the popular saying “the rich get richer and the poor get poorer” really true? In the America, also known as the land of opportunity, there are infinite ways for a person to become successful. Here, you can come into this world into poverty and leave with riches and vise versa. In America, people of any status have the same opportunities to make it big and live a life that has been always been dreamt of. This is what we are forced to believe and convince ourselves in order to keep society in order.…

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays