Class Conflict In The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

Improved Essays
Karl Marx critiques the ideologies of capitalism, more specifically the necessity of class conflict through the texts The Economic & Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, Capital, The German Ideology and predominantly in The Communist Manifesto. He calls for an eventual societal restructure that is less dependent on morality, but a restructure through the use of logic. Marx argues that the opposing interests of the bourgeoisie and proletariat as a necessity for capitalism to function will have negative long term effects. Initially, a capitalist economy will lead towards innovation , appearing to move away from the structural flaws of feudal society, but over time the system will break down causing the a decrease in profit margins for the bourgeoisie, but more importantly the immiseration and exploitation of the proletariat workers through the commoditization of their labour and the commoditization of themselves . Marx proposes that the only way to break free from this cycle is through revolution subsequently creating a classless society called “communism”(!); a societal system where the means …show more content…
He states that mode of production can be understood as M-C-M’ where the purpose of gaining capital is reinvestment to keep producing more and more goods. The bourgeoisie class, the employers, benefit greatly from this system as they own the means of production whilst the proletariat class, the workers, sell their labour for wages and have no means of production. There is an exploitative relationship between the workers and employers. For the employer to add value to their goods, the labourer has to work longer than it takes to make a daily living wage, and gaining essentially nothing than the security of their employment for their extra time as is the basis of surplus

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Marx argued that the bourgeoisie controlled the means of production, wage labour and amassed majority of the wealth as a result, which equated to the power to dominate and define society. The opposing end, the proletariat, were constantly oppressed and left alienated because they maintained no power or ability to rectify their position within society. In addition, specifically within a capitalistic society, there was no opportunity for a meritocracy; so even if the proletariats were highly skilled, they remained pigeonholed with no chance for social mobility without a direct shift within the economic structure of society. When examining this multifarious relationship, Marx asserted in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, “The modern bourgeoisie society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (Marx.)…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mccarthyism Vs Marxism

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the Communist Manifesto Marx explained the historical class struggles that each society has come across since the beginning of time. Class resemblances are usually, the oppressor and the oppressed on opposite sides and classes with various orders of complicated arrangements (p.15). Marx’s believed that his society has not left the class antagonism from earlier times such as the Ancient Roman’s, however, enforced new classes with new conditions and struggles for the oppressed individuals, in place of the old policies (p.15). In Communist Manifesto Marx noted the two classes of his society were the bourgeoisie and proletariats (p.16). Quite simply, the bourgeoisie were the capitalists who were the enforcers and owners of the properties in…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Communist Manifesto states that she struggle between the working class and the bourgeoisie always results in a revolution and eventual “ruin of the contending classes” (1). Marx clearly states that the…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism The Crucible

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Imagine living in a world where no human oppresses another. Imagine living in a world where no one is poor and no one is rich. Imagine living in a world where the social class system is non-existent. Karl Marx, a 19th century philosopher, foresaw the image of this apparent communist utopia forming in every society; he expected the maltreated working classes to fight back against those who have immense, misused power. He believed that material possessions have a powerful enough influence on our lives to be considered the sole reason of historical change.…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dissent from Capitalism “What does this accusation amount to? The history of all past society is the history of class antagonisms, which took different forms in different epochs” (Blaisdell 140-141). Karl Marx made an accusation that capitalism will eventually come to an end.…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx adamantly believed in the power of a classless society. The prerequisites to implementing such a system, however, include considerable regulations on property, economic activity, and other aspects of civilization that John Stuart Mill was a proponent of de-regulating. Marx argued, “[The fall of the bourgeoisie] and the victory of the proletariat is inevitable,” (80) essentially claiming that he believed the forces of the economy would naturally move towards communism. In a society where all citizens are treated equally and given the same amount despite what they put in, the economy will collapse. There is no force of self-interest to incentivize the population to push forward.…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wetbacks followed people from south America and Mexico trying to illegally enter the United States. Due to their social location or, the group memberships that people have because of their location in history and society, they are subjected to conditions here in America we would never experience. Ana’s father could no longer afford to pay for tuition for her schooling so she had to be pulled from the 7th grade. In the US, school up through high school is free because with federal and state taxes we can afford to pay for free and universal primary education.…

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Karl Marx presents 2 major oppositions in the Communist Manifesto; both that have huge effects on society’s social structure as a whole. When illustrating “right vs. wrong” or “good vs. evil”, Marx uses capitalism as a symbol of what's evil or detrimental in society’s social structure and communism as a symbol of all things good or for the betterment of society. Marx explains that capitalism harms society with its inflexible/unstable ways, and its inability to maintain a state of content for all socio-economic classes. Capitalism essentially separates people into two groups: “The haves” and “The have nots”; which inevitably causes friction and ultimately makes an unstable social order. Marx goes forth to explain how communism is inheritably…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism In Fight Club

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capitalism, according to Marx, is a mode of production based on private ownership of the means of production. It is a system of social relations in which labour-power is commodified and the driving force of society is the accumulation of capital. Marx theorized that economic systems result in two social classes, one of which holds the power and uses it to oppress the other. In capitalism, this is the bourgeoisie, the capitalists, who own the means of production, and the proletariat who’s labour allows the system to function and is the source of the bourgeoisie’s power. As such, the social relations of production are antagonistic.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx presented Marxism as a way of understanding class divisions in the world that were based on the emphasis on materialism. Marx proposed a society without money or class divisions, diminishing the idea of materialism and capitalism, instead offering that equality in a society is based on how a society is run. Marx’s claims stemmed from an ideological perspective that individuals are more inclined to their wants instead of their needs, he offers that a society must work in a way where not just one individual but an entire society must give what they can to their state or government and take what they need not what they want. Doing this, Marx argues, will remove class conflict and monetary disparities. Marx idealized a utopia of equality for all, not just a certain few.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Instead, the new ruling class, the proletariat, when in control, will abolish the ownership of private property and the classes will disappear (Marx & Engels, 1848). Marx and Engels (1848) state the resulting conflict and revolution can be solved through the adoption of Communism, whereby there are no class distinctions in the society. In the second preamble; ‘Proletarians and Communists’, Marx and Engels explores the relationship between the communism and the working class. They state that the Communism would be organized in favor of the proletariat and focus on their interests rather than those of a specific class (Marx & Engels, 1848). They expound on the characteristics of the Communist…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marx's Class Theory Essay

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Marx's class theory determines what class you belong to depending on your means of production, meaning who owned the assets necessary to produce what people needed in order to survive. The people who owned the most land and factories were considered to be higher up in the social class hierarchy, also known as the first class the bourgeoisie. They would then control all of the elements in society as well as having control over the working class. Then there is the second class known as the proletariat, these were the people of the lower class who worked in the factories or land owned by the bourgeoisie for hourly wages. This shows that using Marx theory is a quick and simple way to determine someone’s rank in society.…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He felt that capitalism was harmful to every person part of the Proletariat, while the Bourgeoisie, the owners of means of production benefited…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxism in The Hunger Games If there is any perfect representation of Marxism in film it is in The Hunger Games. For this case study, I will be focusing on the first movie of the trilogy. This paper will overview the way Marxism is shown in The Hunger Games using a few examples from the movie. In this paper, I argue that The Hunger Games’ plot line has Marxism theories extremely exposed and almost blatantly exposed. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels developed Marxism in the early 1900s.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Their system of administration combined both their own as well as Roman elements. The new social order saw the dominance of the military commander, who became the monarch & a new nobility, drawn from warriors and an educated, Romanised elite. Peasants, who constituted their armies, became impoverished due to continual warfare. This led to their enserfment to feudal lords. There existed 2 kinds of groupings in feudal Europe- serfs and lords in villages and craftsmen & journeymen or apprenti who were part of the guild organization in towns.…

    • 2286 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays