Karl Marx Vs Command Economy

Superior Essays
Today, many will agree that the world revolves around commerce, as the economy has been the main focal point of many thriving nations. Globally, the most common economic system is a mixed economy, which is a combination of a command and market economy. A command economy is focused on the central government. In a command economy, the government has control over the marketplace, and decides what is produced and sold. A market economy focuses on private business, and it allows for free trade and competition. In a market economy, individuals and businesses can buy as sell as they wish. Capitalism is known as a market economy, and it is practiced in the United States along with other countries. Karl Marx criticizes capitalism and offers communism, …show more content…
Marx uses an equation to demonstrate the concept of exchange value, which is X of commodity A = Y of commodity B. This equation demonstrates that the exchange value of a commodity appears when two commodities are exchanged and both of their use-value equate. The X and Y variables in this equation represent quantity. This demonstrates that although the quantity can differ, the use-value could still be equal, giving each commodity an exchange value. For example, twenty pieces of cotton could equal one t-shirt. Therefore, the main idea of exchange value is that commodities could be exchanged at different quantities with the same use-value. Commodities contain both use and exchange value, but ultimately, a commodity is a product of human labor. This is the main reason commodities are commensurable. Labor is what gives a commodity an exchange value. There is also other reason why commodities are commensurable. Without a use-value, commodity wouldn’t need to be obtained, making them useless. If there is no use-value, then there would be no exchange value, because useless products would never be exchanged in a market place. Therefore, both the exchange and use-value are factors in the commensurability of commodities, which is embodied in the fact that commodities are products of

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Humans will eventually reach a point where having more of a commodity will yield less utility and, therefore, less value. Utility is very important in exchange value because commodities being exchanged at sufficient quantities and at the correct time allows for the best value. Exchange value for a divisible commodity, as mentioned by Jevons in The History of Economic Thought, A Reader, is mainly decided by the final degree of a commodity’s utility rather than its total utility. A simple assumption about humans is that they will never give up something they desire more for something that they would desire less.…

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a student in America we all know the struggle of affording college. With the prices of tuition going higher each year it is becoming a journey to even attend college, let alone graduate with a degree. In America’s capitalist society college is becoming more and more of a business and less of a institution that is truly dedicated to bettering the student. With capitalism we have the ability to raise and lower costs of things based on how much we have and how successful the business is. These prices are not controlled by the government entirely, but instead by us.…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hernando De Soto Analysis

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If the entrepreneur doesn’t have property rights to turn an asset into something else of more value or the ability to partner with another property owner the entrepreneur is limited to the valuation of the original asset. There is not an incentive to create something greater to benefit other members of the market and themselves. In Rob Harmon’s video, water is fungible because it is tangible, but more importantly people had rights to it. Those people could use that resource as capital to turn it into something more than just water.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States of America has operations that lead to its prosperous economy the nation is recognized as capitalist for its focus of opportunity. For one scarcity is highly taken in to account when distributing a product. The law of demand extends to the labor force and consumption. The most crucial concepts within the economy of the United States are scarcity, law of demand, and capitalism. Those concepts do and will apply to the way I live by limiting certain resources and making me aware of benefits.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Relentless Revolution

    • 1595 Words
    • 7 Pages

    There are many aspects of American government that have shaped it into what it is today, a few of those being culture, politics, and economics. There are three main economic systems: socialism, communism, and the most popular in the western world, capitalism. Born in 17th century Europe, capitalism can be defined as the investment of money with the intention of profiting. After spreading across Europe, colonization forced capitalism upon other countries. Capitalism was once a fundamental component to progress and aided in economic growth, which led to the industrial revolution, improved standards of living, and increased gross domestic product.…

    • 1595 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two Hemispheres: A Comparison and Contrast of Capitalism and Socialism For the last couple centuries, since the Industrial Revolution the world has been experiencing a tremendous wave of changes in the matters of society, economy and political practices. During this time, two major systems emerged as the result and/or perhaps as a response to the many challenges and opportunities brought by Industrial Revolution. The two hemispheres of power, capitalism and socialism are the two most influential systems that throughout modern history have had an impact the social structures, economic methods and political position of many nations. The importance of analyzing the similarities and differences between both systems present an insight to how…

    • 1058 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Conflicting Views of Adam Smith and Karl Marx on the Division of Labor and the Role of Money in Exchange In their works, Adam Smith and Karl Marx prove to have differing opinions on money and the division of labor. Although they understand money as a representation of value and as a medium of exchange, they arrive at different conclusions about the role of money in social life. Smith sees the division of labor as a constructive system and a means of furthering exchange, leading to the use of money. Marx, on the other hand, finds labor to turn human beings into alienated workers, and the division of labor to spread and increase this concept.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Inequality in income can depend on what particular political system and what economic system a country uses. The three kinds of economies are the traditional economy, the command economy, and the market economy. Traditional economies are thought of as “old-fashioned” and “under-developed” resulting in little growth economically and therefore there are not many areas with this kind of economy that still exist. This type of economy is usually situated in rural areas. Farming and agriculture are the main sources of income and because of this, the wealth is usually kept in the hand of a few selected individuals.1…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Education reform in the United States has many layers that are dynamic and complex which creates divisions in the search for solutions between all players from school staff and administrators, parents, politicians, and the government. Three points of view will be used as frameworks to structure possible solutions in curbing the downfall of the U.S. educational system. I will first provide a brief overview of two economic theory models, capitalism and communism that will further structure my analysis. Capitalism is an economic system in a free market society where price dictates the laws of demand and supply for goods and services.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With a commodity this is where the priniciple of value emerges from which then goes hand and hand with value. Each person that produces some sort of comodity has the end goal of selling the product to someone that has use for it. As people do this they would need a baseline for how to value these comodities. This is where the basic concept of money would arise. Money is a simple universal way to establish the value of a commodity before it is sold.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A centralised command economy is “An economy in which production, investment, prices, and incomes are determined centrally by the state”, this is a system that was supported by the German philosopher & economist Karl Marx, this is essentially a form of communism. On the other extreme is the free market economy, also known as a capitalist system of production, where there is intervention from external sources, this form of control was heavily supported by the renowned ‘father of modern economics, Adam Smith’. Karl Marx states ‘The worker does not necessarily gain when the capitalist…

    • 1983 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Argumentative Essay about Economic Systems by: Dawson Simeroth Capitalism is defined by Webster's Dictionary as: "a way of organizing an economy so that the things that are used to make and transport products (such as land, oil, factories, ships, etc.) are owned by individual people and companies rather than by the government. " Capitalism is much more superior than socialism because it accommodates for both the needs of the individual person as well as the needs of the society as a whole. For example, capitalism allows the prices of all goods and services to be set by the market. One can observe this even today with the prices of certain goods rising and dropping due to supply and demand. Some might say that unstable prices make for an unstable economy.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Merriam-Webster defines capitalism as “an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market”. Karl Marx was a socialist, born in Prussia in 1818. He is considered by many to be the father of modern day communism. Marx and his followers were very critical of capitalism for three main reasons. This essay will distinguish and evaluate the three Marxist critiques of capitalism.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    So the value of what they produce in terms of the conditions under which it can be exchanged for the things they consume will determine the level of their material life. A theory of value should term the factors that determine the income distribution. Value is a fundamental belief or practice about what is desirable, worthwhile, and important to an individual. Humans do value some things more highly than others, and that their actions are the manifestation of those values. The notion that humans always choose what they prefer may seem too extreme.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Regarding the equation of exchange, Velocity is presumed to remain constant. On the other hand, changes in M produce a similar change in the price level. In the vent of economic changes to full employment the degree of output changes in y. Every change cause change in P. This approach of the quantity theory of money specified a proportionality theory.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays