Relationship Between Individuals And Society By Karl Marx And Georg Simmel

Improved Essays
Social theorists, writers and philosophers of almost every time period have examined the convoluted relationship between social relations and individuals including Karl Marx and Georg Simmel. While some have taken the approach that individuals are shaped by their social world, others insist that the social world itself is what shapes individuals. There are a few theories that exist with regards to the connection between individuals and society which will be discussed throughout this short essay in order to fully explain the relationship between individuals and society.
Starting off with the conflict theory by Karl Marx, he was primarily focused on the structures of society. The conflict theory is one of the fundamental ideologies that explains social life as a battle between social groups for power and scarce resources. It tends to explicitly explain social life in the most accurate way possible as it clarifies the inequalities of money, gender, class, and age while displaying how members of privileged groups maintain advantages while subordinate groups struggle. The ruling class known as the bourgeoisie is made up of those who own property and the means of production. The lower class, who Marx called the proletariat consists of those who don’t own property or mans of production. The proletariat are exploited by bourgeoisie to
…show more content…
Simmel focused a lot of his analysis on how human behaviour can be mainly understood based on the social group to which the individual belongs to and the kind of restrictions they challenge in specific forms of interaction. As individuals within society are continuously involving themselves in different groups and interacting with different individuals, they create social structures and these structures have an effect on the personality of the individuals. Individuals become deliberately oriented to one

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    They are the group that has to sell their labor to the capitalist in order to make a living. Marx theorized that the group in power must keep the powerless in a rather disadvantaged position in order to maintain the status quo and their privileged positions. Thus, regardless of hard work and pulling oneself by the bootstrap, if you were born in the lower or working class, you will end up in the lower or working class. The unequal distribution of wealth and power is especially transparent in our justice system. Those in power make and create laws that benefit themselves.…

    • 1374 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx argued that the bourgeoisie controlled the means of production, wage labour and amassed majority of the wealth as a result, which equated to the power to dominate and define society. The opposing end, the proletariat, were constantly oppressed and left alienated because they maintained no power or ability to rectify their position within society. In addition, specifically within a capitalistic society, there was no opportunity for a meritocracy; so even if the proletariats were highly skilled, they remained pigeonholed with no chance for social mobility without a direct shift within the economic structure of society. When examining this multifarious relationship, Marx asserted in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, “The modern bourgeoisie society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (Marx.)…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mccarthyism Vs Marxism

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the Communist Manifesto Marx explained the historical class struggles that each society has come across since the beginning of time. Class resemblances are usually, the oppressor and the oppressed on opposite sides and classes with various orders of complicated arrangements (p.15). Marx’s believed that his society has not left the class antagonism from earlier times such as the Ancient Roman’s, however, enforced new classes with new conditions and struggles for the oppressed individuals, in place of the old policies (p.15). In Communist Manifesto Marx noted the two classes of his society were the bourgeoisie and proletariats (p.16). Quite simply, the bourgeoisie were the capitalists who were the enforcers and owners of the properties in…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This German philosopher was in the midst of many revolutions throughout his time. At one point, he was known as the spokesman of the ‘Communist Party’ in 1848, which signifies the kind of involvement he was intervened within at the time. Although Marx was a member of a wealthy family in which he utilized to acquire good education, he was a philosopher who critiqued capitalism. Marx attacks the bourgeoisie families and individuals who happened to be property owners or factory occupants, and critiqued these families and individuals because he believed as property owners; they would need to hire people in order to operate the property. His idea of discarding the middle class was revealed in the third idea of his book The Communist Manifesto.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many of the works and theories of the social theorists during the 19th and early 20th century are still relevant today even with all the changes that we have gone through as a society. The issues discussed in Weber’s and Marx’s class theories; DuBois’ theories about race and Durkheim 's theories on society and labor are the basis on which many of today’s ideologies are derived. Karl Marx was a class theorist and theorized about class struggles and the ideal class society. He also had theories about the construction of society and the interaction between the wealthy and working classes which he called the bourgeoisie and the proletariats. One of his major ideas was that of alienation of the working class.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx stated that proletariat was oppressed and under the exploitation of the bourgeoisie. The workers would create products that the capitalist would sell for more than it was actually worth. There was profit from this system, but the proletariat did not benefit from it. According to Marx, this system would lead the society to self destruct. He believed the the continuation of exploitation would cause the proletariat to hate the bourgeoisie.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Porter Income Inequality

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He also shows that the portion of national income owned by the bottom fifth of the population changes in both directions (although more heavily downward) over time. This reflects processes of ebbs and flows, which once again contrast Marx’s vision of a one-way street toward equality through the breakdown of class. Finally, Marx argued that the proletariat would gain a sense of “class consciousness” and rebel against the bourgeoisie, giving way to a more equal society. In this article, though, there is no mention of any revolutionary sentiments among the working class against the capitalists. This may add a level of complexity to Marx’s theory where there may be other factors that promote solidarity other than class.…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Hobbes, in his work “Leviathan,” and Marx, in his work “Manifesto of the Communist Party,” both discuss conflict¬¬¬— they differ about the ideal society, the main source of conflict, and the use of conflict generally. Many philosophers have differing views when it comes to the topic of an ideal society; Hobbes and Marx are no different. While Hobbes believes humans should seek to achieve a peaceful society free from conflict, Marx states that the ideal society is a society free from class. Marx believes history has a path that calls for a communist, a classless, society (p. 490)—meaning, humans have gone through various types of economic systems such as industrialism and feudalism.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Popular culture and mass media has a large influence on our identities, behaviors, and interacts with people in society. Thousands of movies are made and watched throughout the globe, it is a form of entertainment that presents a bigger picture than most of us can capture. When we begin to analyze films using sociological theory, we are introduced to new themes, conflicts, and emotions that we do not originally notice. In this case, I will be analyzing a clip from the movie Mean Girls, one of the most popular films in mass media today, and use it to demonstrate how class conflict and dramaturgy occur. A well-known sociological theorist by the name of Karl Marx spent his time analyzing and understanding how class conflict arises.…

    • 2451 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This second social class make up is much more modernized in that it is essentially a representative of the division of labor as well as the accumulation of capital. Marx’s viewpoints of the bourgeoisie and proletariat which he expressed in The Communist Manifesto, are much more favorable and consistent with the second social class break down presented in the movie, Get…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Money, although they say that it isn’t everything, money actually is a huge part of daily life. Every family, business, and organizations depends on money to survive and grow. No matter the place you go or things you do you are a variable of the functionalist or conflict theory of sociology. Each class is exploiting the other for goods and services and you can clearly see this in the information given below. In table one; the graph gives information for the healthcare received in households of several different incomes.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He divided the population into two groups: the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. The bourgeoisie was the ruling class; they own the means of production and, because of this, control the people. The proletariat operates the means of production, and is controlled by the bourgeoisie. Marx claimed that everyone fit into one of these groups. Marx’s two social classes are very apparent in Fahrenheit 451’s society.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was very early on in my existence that I realized I was entirely different from the majority – that I had been grasped by the demon, Different. I would soon come to understand, after that primordial seizure, that many lights cast an unfavorable illumination upon my inability to conform. Thus, following my inexperienced nature, I attempted to submerge my most personal penchants under the inky blackness of attempted assimilation, a machination designed to hide their ungainly refulgence so that I could blend with those around me. It was not until I realized that I was strangling my very identity that I resolved to adhere more strictly to myself, rather than to those with whom I found acquaintance. My situation was most likely exacerbated by the fact that my predilections towards knowledge, learning, and the constant desire to pursue the unknown were in stark contrast to the social norm, in which a taste for conviviality and socialization ruled unchallenged.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Karl Marx explains social inequalities through a society being stratified along economic lines and social class being defined solely on economic position. According to Marx, a person’s economic position is their relationship to means of production, which defines social class. Based on an industrial society, he defined social class by two classes; the capitalist class (Bourgeoisie) and the working class (Proletariat). Marx felt strongly against capitalism and believed that everyone should have a communistic society, which would have no surpluses so only what is needed by the people would be produced.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is characterized by the relations of economic subordination and domination. Marx looked at society and division of labour and finds that two different class that bring differences…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays