Analysis Of The Communist Manuscripts, By Karl Marx

Great Essays
The German born philosopher and sociologist, Karl Marx centralized his ideas around the flaws of capitalism. He published works like Capital, Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts, and co-authored The Communist Manifesto, and The German Ideology along with Friedrich Engels. In these writings, Marx focuses on the breakdown of economic classes (such as wage laborers, capitalists, and land owners), and the necessities produced to survive (Appelrouth & Edles 2016: 28). Marx blames capitalism for alienating workers from their species being, thus contributing to the lack of class-consciousness that is further intensified with commodity fetishism. In the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts, Marx asserts that alienation is deeply rooted in capitalism. …show more content…
According to Appelrouth and Edles (2016: 56), in The Communist Manifesto, Marx and Engles informed the public of the poor treatment of the working class in hopes that the working class would revolt. They believed that achieving class-consciousness would allow the working class to overthrow the current capitalistic economy that benefits the few, and instead would benefit the vast majority of the population. Marx felt that eliminating private owner ship was vital in creating a classless society (Marx in Appelrouth & Edles: 67). By creating a classless society people would be able to reach the full potential of their species being, and exploitation would be eliminated. Nevertheless Marx understood that class consciousness would be difficult to achieve considering that those in power tend control the ideas of those not in power by means of the media and education (Appelrouth & Edles 2016: …show more content…
He claims that this cycle is exclusive to capitalism, and labels the cycle M-C-M for the capitalist and C-M-C for the working class. Marx continues with M-C-M, it indicates that someone who owns capital (M) purchases commodities (C) to create other commodities for profit (M), in short “It takes money to make money” (Appelrouth and Edles 2016; 72). C-M-C means that the employee sales her work as a commodity (C) for a wage (M) that she spends on commodities (C) she requires to live (Marx in Appelrouth & Edles 2016: 82). This example exposes how difficult it is to get out of the cycle. Marx is essentially saying that income prevents the worker from purchasing goods that don’t allow there to be exploitation. Thus the worker will remain exploited and will produce more commodities that she will later be forced to buy for survival without

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Marx believed that the process of production and the distribution of the means of life is necessary to be examined to analyze a society and its problems. Marx further related these means of production to class struggle and labor power. Furthermore, Marx believes that the Bourgeoisie class possesses all the means of production and exploits the Proletariat class by making use of the working class labor for their own profits and thus, make their private property. Therefore, Marx proposed the idea of “Communism” under which he depicts this class struggle within the society and promotes the idea of no private property, meaning where all the property is publically owned and everyone works and gets what they deserve on the basis of their ability and needs rather than acquiring it inherently. Furthermore, he was strictly against capitalism and believes it to be inherently unstable. This idea of Marx is based on the fact that the bourgeoisie has transformed various professions such as “the physician, the lawyer, the priest, the poet, the man of science, into its paid wage labourers” (Communist Manifesto 16). Furthermore, according to Marx, with the free market the bourgeoisie class takes all the profits of the capital and pay these laborers with the minimum wages which cease them from further increasing their conditions and thus, their labor is not serving them…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx had an opposite view on how a society should work economically and it was not such of a capitalistic economy. Karl Marx was much of a communistic ideals in which he addresses in his book the Communist Manifesto. Karl Marx believed that in a capitalistic government the rich will only get richer and a disadvantage to the poor. Karl Marx argued and writes “The capitalist is always in a better position to negotiate a low wage for his workers.” In such way Karl Marx ideas were not similar to capitalistic views in any way, he believed that much of capitalistic views were to destroy the citizens. Karl Marx believes that goods and services is directly connected to the amount of labor required for its production. Most importantly, the two classes in society, the bourgeoisie(the wealthy capital owning) and proletariat(the poor working class) will forever be stuck in their same class because of capitalism. To illustrate such idea he developed the ideas of surplus values. Karl ideas of surplus values is the relationship between the worker and his product and the employer. Marx is saying that the worker will receive a salary of the amount of goods produced and the difference between the cost of labor and the price which the product was sold will be the profit. In such ways, the factories and stores should be taken from the capitalist and should be taken over by the workers. Karl Marx…

    • 1112 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Communist Manifesto opens to the reader by stating, “The history of all hitherto societies has been the history of class struggles”, meaning that there is a perpetual tug-of-war struggle between class status between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat (Marx, 1). Marx states that the bourgeoisie are those who set up the production as “the class of modern capitalists”, whereas the proletariat is the group that works beneath the means of production from the bourgeoisie, “having no means of production of their own” (footnote, 1). The Communist Manifesto states that she struggle between the working class and the bourgeoisie always results in a revolution and eventual “ruin of the contending classes” (1). Marx clearly states that the…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Like the classical economists, he focused on the dynamic evolution of capitalism as a system, and the turbulent relationships between different classes.”(Stanford p.54) During the Mid-nineteenth century, Marx opposed capitalism, believing “payment of profit on private investments did not reflect any particular economic function” (Stanford p.54). Marx is saying that the workers aren’t getting paid for the amount of work they put in. Capitalists were exploiting these workers and rather than sharing the wealth/profits, they were paying the workers a diminished amount (Labor Theory of Value). This is where Marx’s political beliefs ties into his economic beliefs. He criticized the exploitation of workers and described a socialist alternative to capitalism. (Stanford Table 4.1 chart.pg 60). Marx’s ideal solution is a socialist economy. Most Capitalist business owners are grossly overpaid in comparison to their workers who are actually doing the labor. Marx’s socialist plan is basically turning capitalism into communism. Instead of having a capitalistic society making wealthy people wealthier at the expense of hard working laborers, the socialist society will work towards making sure the poor gets paid equally with everyone else and to eliminate social classes. Karl Marx political and economic views…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx is one of the best known philosophers and one of the best known social scientists of all time. He is often referred to as the “Father of Communism,” and is very rightfully so. His very radical viewpoints have served as a foundation for the political and social ideologies of socialism and even more primarily communism. Although he and his viewpoints were heavily rejected by fellow philosophers and other people of his time, they gained much more prominence in the early 20th century during the time of the revolutionary socialist movement. His ideas about society, economics, and politics have been the cornerstone for countless governments over the years spanning from the 19th century, through the 20th century, and even into the 21st…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As industrialization became more evident and the gap between the bourgeoisie and proletariat widened, the inequality between the classes became unmistakably noticeable. German socialist Karl Marx saw the negligence of the proletariate and wished to do something about it. Karl Marx, with the help of Friedrich Engles, wrote The Communist Manifesto in 1848. In the Manifesto, Marx describes the inequality between the worker and the business owner and the struggle of the proletariat. He created a political system that would put the power into the hands of the worker, making everyone equal. Marx believed that this worldwide worker revolution was inevitable and that the workers would win. This Marxist ideology greatly impacted the world in the early 20th century during the bolshevik…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Karl Marx presents 2 major oppositions in the Communist Manifesto; both that have huge effects on society’s social structure as a whole. When illustrating “right vs. wrong” or “good vs. evil”, Marx uses capitalism as a symbol of what's evil or detrimental in society’s social structure and communism as a symbol of all things good or for the betterment of society. Marx explains that capitalism harms society with its inflexible/unstable ways, and its inability to maintain a state of content for all socio-economic classes. Capitalism essentially separates people into two groups: “The haves” and “The have nots”; which inevitably causes friction and ultimately makes an unstable social order. Marx goes forth to explain how communism is inheritably…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Capital by Karl Marx examines the capitalist economic system. To Marx, while capitalism is undeniably powerful and productive it also serves to limit our ability to exercise our right to freedom, happiness, and equality. The capitalist system of economics is often highlighted as one of the prominent reasons for American prosperity. Therefore it is striking that this work takes issue with it operation. This paper will examine Marx’s ideas about the faults of capitalism.…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Communist Manifesto was an interesting read. It’s hard to take any of it seriously, however, knowing about the life of Karl Marx and the effects of communism and similar ideologies. Karl Marx had 7 children, half that died of starvation very young. It isn’t hard to see what caused these children to die, as Marx had never worked a day in his life. He was a fanatic who greatly sacrificed his own health and that of his family to write, while depending heavily on Friedrich Engels’s money. Considering this, and then reading his most famous work, it’s hard to not think of the question “What would he know about the grievances of the working class?’ Not ironically, just as Marx was responsible for the starvation and death of half of his children,…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx tries to examine the oppression workers were going through in Europe, especially on the unequal distribution of wealth under the capitalistic system. He proposes a way through which the proletariat class can wage a revolution against the ruling bourgeois class to win social and economic equality. Marx views history as a struggle of classes, such as master and servant and bourgeoisie and the working class (1998). He proposed that as the lower class gained power, a new class would emerge to subsume the old upper class with an emergent of the merchant class and a working class. As the working class eliminates the rest of the classes, there would be no need for class struggle without trappings of class welfare, for instance nation-states, money, and governments.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Marx, capitalists exploit workers for their labor without sharing any labors equally. Hence, the exploitation occurs; it is what allows the owning classes to dominate and impose their ideology politically on the workers around the world (Garner and Hancock 2014). Furthermore, with Friedrich Engels, Marx claims that “A capitalist society is a society of class inequality, like most societies that preceded it in history” (2014:39). Indeed, the class of capitalists, which is also known as bourgeoisie, particularly enrages Marx. It is said that members of the bourgeoisie “own the means of production” and “exploit the class of laborers” which is called the proletariat; of course, they do not own the means of production as reported in Garner and Hancock’s study (P. 41). Marx, in addition, believes that the bourgeoisie and the proletariat inescapably were “accompanied by a corresponding political advance of that class” (p. 44). From my perspective, Marx gradually predicts that the laborers are destined to overthrow the capitalists. Inequality then affects people and knowledge. That is why Kenneth Allan (2012) concludes in his book, Explorations in Classical Sociological Theory: Seeing the Social World, regarding Karl Marx’s class conflict that: “Private property and slave labor came into existence, as well as significant class inequality” (p. 79). As the class struggle later on nears the…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism In Fight Club

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capitalism, according to Marx, is a mode of production based on private ownership of the means of production. It is a system of social relations in which labour-power is commodified and the driving force of society is the accumulation of capital. Marx theorized that economic systems result in two social classes, one of which holds the power and uses it to oppress the other. In capitalism, this is the bourgeoisie, the capitalists, who own the means of production, and the proletariat who’s labour allows the system to function and is the source of the bourgeoisie’s power. As such, the social relations of production are antagonistic. Given this power struggle class conflict is inherent. Marx’s critique of capitalism speculates that the proletariats…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx criticizes capitalism in a multitude of his essays, including the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. His critique of capitalism varies from the exploitation of workers to the instability of the capitalist system, but fundamentally his issue with capitalism is the dehumanization of laborers. Marx argues that under capitalism, laborers are dehumanized because they are alienated, or disconnected from fundamental human properties, in four aspects – products of labor, labor, species-being, and human-human relations.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Merriam-Webster defines capitalism as “an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market”. Karl Marx was a socialist, born in Prussia in 1818. He is considered by many to be the father of modern day communism. Marx and his followers were very critical of capitalism for three main reasons. This essay will distinguish and evaluate the three Marxist critiques of capitalism.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the first stage, production grew due to increasing division of labour. However, this was not enough to meet the demands of ever-expanding markets. This resulted in the improvement of technical knowledge and henceforth mechanization became a hallmark of capitalism. Marx believed capitalist society to be divided into 2 main classes- the bourgeois or the capitalist class which owns the means of production, & the proletariat or the working class which sells its labour in the market. The capitalist operates on the profit motive & does not pay workers, drawn from the industrial reserve army, wages equivalent to the value created by them. The surplus value becomes the source of this profit. Further division of labour increases the alienation of workers in that they do not feel a sense of pride and ownership over the fruits of their labour. Marx uses the term ‘capitalist anarchy' to describe the inherent instability of the system due to constant revolutionizing of the instruments of production and its subjection to market forces. The concentration of property and wealth in the hands of a few, also leads to greater political centralization with laws being formulated in favour of the bourgeois. Marx applauded the move towards industrialization and urbanization for freeing men from the burden of traditional ties and sentiment and simplifying class antagonisms. He believed that capitalism harboured its own seeds of destruction. The concentration of labour in the workplace, combined with their increasing pauperization, would end their isolation and create consciousness of their exploitation. Their numbers would rise further due to the descent of the petty bourgeoisie into poverty. This will lead to greater polarization of the classes and eventually the working class will transform from a ‘class in itself' to a ‘class for itself'. According to Marx, all previous historical movements were led by…

    • 2286 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays