1. Kant’s categorical imperative says you must only act in a way you wish everyone to act at all times. If we universalize cheating, no one is honest. No one will take their academics or careers seriously because there is no real evidence that anyone knows what they are doing.
2. The Golden Rule views charity donations quite different from Kant’s categorical imperative. According to Kant, people donate to charity as a reflective of their own need(s), rather than their rational will to do good. Kant defines our actions to help or donate to others as a mean for our own benefit. Therefore, donating to charity is an imperfect duty under the categorical imperative.
3. …
a. We don’t think so because if you are presenting information such as statistics, graphs and charts you should always proof-read before presenting or …show more content…
Although he may or may not be lying, but as an executive member, we would think the junior marketing professional is irresponsible. No matter your position in a company if tasked and responsible for coming up with business plans, results from campaigns or any sort of quantitative data, you need to ensure it is accurate so everyone in the process has a general idea of where the company and these results stand.
5. “I just put the data into Excel and copied the resulting graph,” sounds a lot like copy and paste with no effort to double-check your work. This poses a question on his morality/work ethics, which violates the perfect duty. In violations of the imperfect duty, the junior marketing professional lacks the ability necessary to accomplish his project. Hence, his response “didn’t know,” proves his negligence of his data’s accuracy.
6. As a junior marketing professional, we would present the Figure 3 graph to the committee. Although it is not the favorable outcome one would hope for, it is the honest outcome. Some improvement is better than no improvement. As a professional, we have a duty of care to be honest and ethical in all business
2. The Golden Rule views charity donations quite different from Kant’s categorical imperative. According to Kant, people donate to charity as a reflective of their own need(s), rather than their rational will to do good. Kant defines our actions to help or donate to others as a mean for our own benefit. Therefore, donating to charity is an imperfect duty under the categorical imperative.
3. …
a. We don’t think so because if you are presenting information such as statistics, graphs and charts you should always proof-read before presenting or …show more content…
Although he may or may not be lying, but as an executive member, we would think the junior marketing professional is irresponsible. No matter your position in a company if tasked and responsible for coming up with business plans, results from campaigns or any sort of quantitative data, you need to ensure it is accurate so everyone in the process has a general idea of where the company and these results stand.
5. “I just put the data into Excel and copied the resulting graph,” sounds a lot like copy and paste with no effort to double-check your work. This poses a question on his morality/work ethics, which violates the perfect duty. In violations of the imperfect duty, the junior marketing professional lacks the ability necessary to accomplish his project. Hence, his response “didn’t know,” proves his negligence of his data’s accuracy.
6. As a junior marketing professional, we would present the Figure 3 graph to the committee. Although it is not the favorable outcome one would hope for, it is the honest outcome. Some improvement is better than no improvement. As a professional, we have a duty of care to be honest and ethical in all business