Kant's Analysis

Improved Essays
To begin with, Kant states, “Although man as a rational creature desires a law that establishes boundaries for everyone’s freedom” (Kant), here he is stating that humans at the very core desire laws, boundaries, and confinement on morality and free will; humans cling to logic and reason. He also states, “his selfish animal propensities induce him to expect himself from them wherever he can” (Kant), they are selfish in that they self-preserve; people will always look for a way to better themselves with no regards to who they may harm. People expect themselves as a byproduct for the world around them, they are the center of their own world. Kant states, “He thus, requires a master who will break his self-will and force him to obey a universally

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Kant effectively quantifies freedom via his argument for his idea of enlightenment, public/private divide, trade off between rational and physical productivity and finally international governance. He runs into problems however in that he fails to effectively quantify the means of acquiring his aspirational goals of perfect moral constitution, universal enlightenment as well as global cosmopolitan governance. The following section will outline first the public private divide followed by means not considered (harm principle) and the second section will outline the means towards global cosmopolitanism as well as the limitations considered. The attainment of enlightenment is one of the highest level of understanding for Kant and correlates…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. What is the most significant thing I learned this week? In the reading of Contemplative Vision Chapter 2, the discussion of retreats truly helped open my eyes in the impact that spiritual retreats can have on our journey with God. Prior to reading this chapter I had the wrong idea of what a spiritual retreat was.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The challenge of determining what is considered morally permissible is daunting. Perhaps even more intimidating is conveying which people are worthy of the most moral praise; in other words, deciding which people who commit moral actions actually deserve the moral worth to be had from those actions. There are two views precisely on this idea that I will analyze. The first view, associated with Kantians, is based on duty, (Kant, 320) while the second view, associated with Aristotelians, is based on virtue (Aristotle, 130). The view generally associated with Kantians and the view generally associated with Aristotelians both have their similarities and differences; those which make them appealing, and those which make them clash with one another.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second formula of Kant’s Categorical Imperative illustrates that to be a moral it is necessary to treat every human being as an end, never as means. Regarding the sexual relationship of the human being, if someone does not seek her partner’s consent to be engaged in sex, he then humiliates his partner by considering her merely as means. In fact, his behavior is equivalent to a rapist because none of them get consent from the opposite, therefore is immoral. But, this sort of philosophical thinking does not go hand in hand with the religious thinking. Hence, I would like to discuss that Islam, one of the major religions on the planet, seems to be reluctant about the consent of women at the time of intercourse.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Critique of Judgment, Immanuel Kant debunks the idea that beauty is an objective property. To achieve this, he distinguishes between the pleasure on the soul that agreement, goodness, and beauty evoke. In Kant’s views, by claiming something is beautiful, you are not stating a property of the objective but more so the subjective, what the subject feels about the object. Unlike Hume and Burke of the empiricists, who have an experience of liking when they express something as beautiful, Kant indicates that the liking we express is sourced from our judgment of taste. Kant experiences a transcendental perception of beauty whereas Hume and Burke experience an empirical perception, in which something beautiful affects our sensations in the…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Sublime Analysis

    • 1447 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Kant’s distinction between the beautiful and the sublime is very similar to the division Nietzsche makes between the Apollonian and Dionysian tendencies in art. They both claim that there are aesthetic experiences that are oriented towards a form or rational ideal (Nietzsche believes this ideal to be a dream), but there are also aesthetic experiences that expose man to limitlessness and formlessness. However, Kant and Nietzsche are not going to agree on what an aesthetic experience of the limitless and formless will inspire in us. Kant makes a division between the beautiful and the sublime on the basis of where the beauty in each is found. For the beautiful, beauty is present insofar as the art represents a form.…

    • 1447 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I will be going over what I believe Kant would do in the situation of the seven spelunkers. First, I will state if Kant would blast the large man or not, then explain why he would make this decision. Next, I will present a counter-argument to Kant’s opinion. Finally, I will give my own opinion on the topic and conclude the essay.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant And Bullough Analysis

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When art is being processed there exist within the person a sensation of affection, and this affection towards the object is understood as good or bad. When in the instance of good the object is said then to be agreeable or beautiful. The division of which is the topic of this paper, namely that Kant and Bullough outline their distinction of agreeable and beautify, as well as the agreement that when considering art; both agreeable and beauty are two different forms of appreciating art. Art when considered good is then, an influence upon the observer so as to induce some type of affection that is either agreeable or beautiful; both of which are very distinct form each other. When an object of art is in question, it must be good in order for one to call it beautiful.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s Groundworks of the Metaphysics of Morals, and Mill’s Utilitarianism, each offer different arguments about what is morality. They both give us fundamental and universal theories about morality. Before we compare the two, let’s first start with a summary of the main arguments of each philosopher. Mill begins chapter one by setting the stage for what he is going to discuss. Philosophers have discussed the foundation of morality for more than two thousand years.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When it comes to the use of emotion in relation to reason within the Enlightenment, at first glance, Kant’s definition of reason lacks any mention of it. However, in an article by Chad Wellmon, Kant suggests there is a connection between feeling and reason, and therefore reason is not only restricted to the intellect. What does it mean for reason to affect a feeling (or vice versa)? Kant suggests that “all feeling is sensual, and thus determined by natural causality, but on the other hand, he says that respect is a feeling effected through reason” (Wellmon 566).…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are countless people you could analyze for philosophers on metaphysics. Immanuel Kant is seen as the central figure for modern philosophy. He changed early modern rationalism and empiricism and set term for most of 19th and 20th century philosophy. He continues to have a great significance in today’s metaphysics. He also has an influence in epistemology, ethics, political, and many other fields.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral philosophy tries to explain the difference between right and wrong so that people can make good decisions. However, finding out what makes an action right is not so easy. For this reason, several different theories have evolved while trying to explain this issue. One of those theories is deontology, or duty-defined morality. Probably the most famous and influential spokesman of this theory is Immanuel Kant.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Liberal and Conservative Views of Immanuel Kant and Niccolo Machiavelli: The success of the governance of a state relies on leaders methods of gaining and retaining power while constructing society. Immanuel Kant’s ([1784] 2013) book Answer the Question: “What is Enlightenment?” sets the foundation of gaining and retaining power while constructing society around the process of enlightening subjects and eventually transferring political power. Niccolo Machiavelli’s ([1513] 2006)…

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant implies that any being that has autonomy and rationality should always treat others with autonomy and rationality as an end. Yet, Kant doesn 't clearly state how people are supposed to treat other humans as an end. The Principle of Humanity doesn 't give us a road map on how to apply a moral action. Kant would most likely reply to this response by saying that people have autonomy and rationality and should know what the moral action of a situation is. Even with Kant’s response, there are still many situations that we might not be able to determine what the moral action is.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays