Kant's Ideas On Moral Freedom

Great Essays
Show More
During this paper I will discuss Kant’s ideas on moral freedom. I will also discuss the defense of these ideas in the face of three critiques by Andrew Ward. I will then conclude with my remarks and thoughts upon the subject matter. Kant was a firm believer in moral freedom. Kant proposed that we have moral freedom through two different worlds. These worlds are the phenomenal world and the noumenal world. The phenomenal world is the world in which we live; this is the world of appearances. Kant says that the phenomenal world is characterized by being in space and time and is also governed by causality and is ultimately deterministic. The phenomenal world is a world of appearances and not of the things in themselves. If we were only …show more content…
It is almost impossible for someone such as myself to accept the idea of the noumenal world at face value with no evidence. Most of Kant’s argument is entirely contingent upon the existence of the noumenal world. In the third criticism for example, it would appear that all the sensuous decisions are made through the phenomenal world and can be predicted. The sensuous decisions are the decisions I would prescribe to most people. These are the actions in which someone is acting on antecedent factors and experience. In my worldview, humans seem to only ever act on experience. However, with Kant’s idea of the noumenal world and the rational decisions he attempts to save moral freedom. The idea that someone makes a decision not based on experience or prior factors is a hard pill to swallow. The noumenal world is a theoretical construct that Kant introduces to save us from a deterministic worldview in which everything is determined by causality. This is an impossible task. Causality is the reason I act towards a certain goal. Causality is the reason behind every decision a person makes. For Kant to determine that an agent can arise at a decision independent of causality does not seem possible. Furthermore, Kant has presupposed characteristics upon a world he previously remarked could not be understood by humans. The noumenal world therefore is a theoretical construct with no basis in reality. However, to remark that humans are wholly governed by causality is a rather disconcerting

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Mill's Consequences Of Utilitarianism In Mill And Kant
    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mill's Consequences Of Utilitarianism In Mill And Kant

    When he [Kant] begins to deduce from this precept [i.e. CI] any of the actual duties of morality, he fails, almost grotesquely, to show that there would be any contradiction, any logical (not to say physical) impossibility, in the adoption by all rational beings of the most outrageously immoral rules of conduct. All he shows is that the consequences of their universal adoption would be such as no one would choose to incur. Here Mill considers of consequences in moral action, as we will see, Mill’s consequentialism rather than Utilitarianism is the direct charge made to Kant, these two notions are not same, the utiitlirms principle is seek happiness and avoid pain, precisely moral action would be conducted on maximizing happiness and minimizing…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Objection To Kantian Ethics
    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Kant's Objection To Kantian Ethics

    What this objection is that if there is a murderer at the door should you tell him the truth if he ask you if you have seen the person he is looking for. Naturally the answer to this question would be no to most people, but to Kant he looks at it differently. What Kant argues is that if there is a murderer at the door you have a moral obligation to tell the truth to the murderer if you have seen the person or not. Kant argues this by talking about good will and how you act based upon reason also if it morally correct to lie to the murderer at the door. Kant explains to us that we have a moral duty to tell the truth and to not lie because if we do lie then we our not acting morally or fulfilling our duty to tell the truth.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Kant Personal Response
    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kant Personal Response

    In the essay, he emphasizes on the need for people to use their own powers of understanding and reasoning instead of depending on others or on an external system to provide it to them. This essay is essentially a plea for the vital importance of freedom of speech, thought, and debate. When people use other people to make his decisions, their life becomes much easier. But in this process, Kant argues that it disables them from taking their own decisions with their own intellect and hence people gets ultimately immature. This immaturity becomes second nature to him.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Categorical Imperative By Immanuel Kant
    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Categorical Imperative By Immanuel Kant

    In the book, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant lays out his theory for making moral decisions. Unlike many other philosophers, Kant focuses not on the consequences of actions, but on the maxim in which the action was performed; in addition, Kant also tries to find his moral theory a priori instead of through empirical experience. He attempts to formulate a theory grounded through pure reason in which he bases his moral law on something that has never been experienced before that we are able to imagine and strive towards. Kant’s theory circles around the idea of a Supreme Principle of Morality called the Categorical Imperative which encompasses the Formula of Universal Law and the Formula of Humanity; all of which I will…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Passage To Republicanism
    • 159 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Kant's Passage To Republicanism

    Kant’s position, being the “lesser degree of civil liberty” as a necessary way point to the passage to republicanism, is an agreeable viewpoint. His argument, that encompasses the reduced amount of civil freedom, replicates that of the actions of a republican mindset. His argument could include the examples of conservatives positions on gay rights and abortion, that are both prominent political opinions in our society. Taking into consideration, Kant’s era of life, these prominent political situations would still be relevant in the thought process that he produces. He shows that he sticks to the traditional values and attitudes of society, similar to those of republicans that are representing the nation today, leading to the understanding that…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Violation Of Moral Rules
    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant's Violation Of Moral Rules

    Therefore, morality involves a rational action which need rationally that can come also from a priori. For Kant morality must derived from reason because experience cannot tell whether an action is from duty, moral laws are for all rational creatures, so merely human experience won’t get us there, and there are judged by some standard. Duty tells you if we are being moral, because we as people…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analyzing Kant's Critique Of Pure Reason
    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Analyzing Kant's Critique Of Pure Reason

    In his Critique of Pure Reason, Kant argues that because humans are only able to judge objectively, we are closed off from a greater perception and understanding of the world. Things in the phenomenal realm are based upon our interactions and experiences with objects whereas things in the noumenal realm are the simplified form of the things themselves and project the reality of the world in a way that humans are unable to see. Additionally, Kant attributes things in the phenomenal realm as having a priori knowledge, or knowledge that requires no prior experience regarding the subject. Because things in the noumenal realm are isolated from our experience, it is nearly impossible for us to know the complexities of the noumenal realm. Furthermore,…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Comparing Plato's Allegories Of Knowledge And The Gettier Problem
    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Comparing Plato's Allegories Of Knowledge And The Gettier Problem

    What he stated was that reality, or truth, was independent from human thought, and that therefore it is unreachable. In his publication Critique of Pure Reason, Kant stated that experience of things is always of the phenomenal world as transmitted by our senses: we do not have direct access to things in themselves, the noumenal world. Subsequently, postmodernism developed upon this theory and denied the possibility of a purely objective view of reality (truth in knowledge). Within today’s society, our beliefs about life make up a set of spectacles through which we interpret everything and we can't remove them. Interpretation and perspective are in this case necessary to reduce objectivity, but equally humanity will be eternally disabled from acquiring what is meant by full truth.…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Universal Moment To Mathematical Sacrifice In Boy Analysis
    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant's Universal Moment To Mathematical Sacrifice In Boy Analysis

    While Critique of the Power of Judgement make an attempts at bridging the two conflicting ideas in the first two Critiques together by connecting the concept of nature in the first critique with the concepts of freedom in the second critique and show the people the power of human judgements. Thus, from this relationship that has been establish by Kant himself, we have the philosophy of Kant’s Universal Moment in film studies that relate the freedom inside human beings in making decision to the universal nature of the world. But then, it is always thought that humans are greater than nature and that we hold power over them. (Advameg,…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Nietzsche And Kant: Metaphysics
    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Nietzsche And Kant: Metaphysics

    He believed that humans are born with some sort of knowledge about this metaphysical world that you cannot experience (Rohlf). Kant called these beginning concepts synthetic a priori, which all minds have. Kant’s critique of pure reason showed us that he denied speculative reason. He turns to the question “Is it possible to know things in themselves?” In order to for something to be an object of knowledge, we must experience it.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Explain Why Kant Believes That Space Is A Priori Intuition
    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explain Why Kant Believes That Space Is A Priori Intuition

    The reason why Kant believes that the concept of space cannot derive from experience is because in order to experience something external, it must already exist in foundation (Kant B38). There also must be experience of the world in order for the experience to take place. As a result, space cannot derived from relations of external phenomena though experience (Kant B38). In fact Kant believes that anything that is considered to be a representation of something must exist in space.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Kant: The Morality Principle Of Autonomy
    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Kant: The Morality Principle Of Autonomy

    Autonomy can be considered the right to govern your own body and decisions and with this principle Kant states it through arguing the principle of morality. The principle of morality is argued in three ways the first as acting though the maxim of our actions, through our will, were to become a universal law, second is the humanity principle where we act in such a way so as to not treat people as a means but as an end, and lastly act only so that our will could regard itself as giving universal law though its maxim. The foundations for the categorical imperative, where an action is necessary in or itself, include acting in a way that the maxim of our actions could be used as a Universal Law, where we always act in a way that we treat humanity…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Groundwork Of The Metaphysics Of Morals By Kant And John Stuart Mill
    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Groundwork Of The Metaphysics Of Morals By Kant And John Stuart Mill

    In accordance with Immanuel Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, I will argue that ethical actions should be judged by good will alone. By comparing the theories of Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill, I will conclude that Kant’s theories are more realistic in regards to the nature of humans. Immanuel Kant argues that one’s good intentions should be the deciding factor in judging their actions no matter the outcome. What is beneficial about this is that it allows for the expression of the intrinsic values of a person. Since every person has different virtues and opinions, they can act in any way they choose.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Ethical Evaluation Of Kant's Theory
    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ethical Evaluation Of Kant's Theory

    In other words, all individuals must uphold an unconditional good, to do this, one must be a rational person. A key factor relating to Kant’s theory, is that an individual may not interfere with another’s’ goals or objectives that a person may have. In addition, Kant discusses the moral rules that all autonomous and rational…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Theory In Gone Baby Gone
    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Moral Theory In Gone Baby Gone

    Kant’s theory is based on the moral law and duty as an action that should be treated respectfully. By ‘moral dilemma’ we understand the heart-wrenching decision that carries strong intuitive and emotional weight and can lead to a failure of duty (Garlikov 2). This action is influenced by the individual’s desire to act within the principles of the duty. Immanuel Kant explains that an individual can only do the right thing for the right reason, even though acting on duty is not always sufficient, as it can lead a person to do the right thing for the wrong reason. Acting from duty is the only justification what makes this law absolute and universal.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings