Kant Vs Korsgaard

Improved Essays
The last philosopher is Christine Korsgaard, whose argument is mixed with Plato and Immanuel Kant. Both Plato and Kant point out that reason should have the last word in order for a person to be unified with their wills. In “Self-Constitution in the Ethics of Plato and Kant”, by Christine Korsgaard, Kant's categorical model explains people's internal and external forces form inclinations, or our desires. He also says that humans must follow their own laws to be free, "But
Mahida 5
Kant claims that the free will must be determined by some law or other... That is, it must act on a law which it gives to itself. And Kant says that this means that the categorical imperative just is the law of a free will. (Korsgaard 109). When a person has more

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Selfishness In Ishmael

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This attitude feeds into Kant’s theory that it’s “our good will to do things whether the…

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant effectively quantifies freedom via his argument for his idea of enlightenment, public/private divide, trade off between rational and physical productivity and finally international governance. He runs into problems however in that he fails to effectively quantify the means of acquiring his aspirational goals of perfect moral constitution, universal enlightenment as well as global cosmopolitan governance. The following section will outline first the public private divide followed by means not considered (harm principle) and the second section will outline the means towards global cosmopolitanism as well as the limitations considered. The attainment of enlightenment is one of the highest level of understanding for Kant and correlates…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rhonda should claim to be the driver. When she agreed to drive after the party, she took on Larry’s trust, and the responsibility of their, and many others’, lives. Kant’s categorical imperative states that a person should “act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become universal law.” A maxim determines whether the actions that a person take are right, wrong, or permissible. Driving under the influence is wrong in any case and circumstances, as it endangers the life of the drivers, and others on the street.…

    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant claimed that we are likewise autonomous beings, equipped with the freedom to act and make moral decisions. He concluded that these abilities enforce us to oblige to moral laws and codes. Kant highlighted that maximising overall happiness and pleasure does not justify the morality of an action; making a person happy does not make them virtuous. Although…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Aquinas Vs Kant

    • 2053 Words
    • 9 Pages

    A Juxtaposition of the Metaphysics of Aquinas and Kant Two key philosophers that one must examine in order to gain a better grasp of metaphysics are Saint Thomas Aquinas and Immanuel Kant. Through a thorough examination of both thinkers’ metaphysical philosophies, one can conclude that they differ in their beliefs regarding the origin and essence of beings and Being. In his examination of metaphysics, Saint Thomas Aquinas believes that in order to understand being and Being, one must start with God and His heaven, and use his God-given intellect to understand the phenomenal world. However, Kant believes the opposite in that he claims that in order to understand being and Being, one must begin with observing and analyzing the phenomenal world,…

    • 2053 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant Personal Response

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Name- MAYANK MANGAL ID No.- 2014A4PS459H Assignment: Personal Response Essay Immanuel Kant : An answer to the question: What is Enlightenment An answer to the question: What is Enlightenment is an essay which was written by Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) in the year of 1784, the greatest modern philosopher of all times is deeply inspired by Rousseau from where he adopts the novelties of freedom as autonomy or itself legislation. The essay addresses the causes of lack of enlightenment and the preconditions which are necessary to make it possible to enlighten the people. Kant thinks that the people should be given freedom to use their own intellect and he abolished all church and state paternalism.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper shall talk about a dilemma where 8 housemates have to conserve water or be evicted. The problem is one of the housemates does not think his impact on conservation will affect their eviction so he wants to continue his water use. To deal with this issue kantian ethics will be applied, first must apply the categorical procedure of universal law to this argument to see if this is the right thing to do, second must make sure that John is not using his housemates as a means, and finally decide if John is safe to proceed with his decision. Kant talks about his Formula of Universal Law which he explains as thus: “Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.” (pg.30).…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Final Exam 1. In “A Critique of Utilitarianism”, Bernard Williams argues against the fundamental characteristics of utilitarianism and believes that the notion of ends justifying the means are a way of representing the doctrine of negative responsibility which can lead to consequences from the choices we make/do not make (663). As a result, we are all responsible for the consequences that we fail to prevent as well as the ones we brought upon ourselves. That is, in each case the choice on whether an action is right is determined by its consequences (661). Williams gives the example of killing one villager to save 19 others (664) in which he critiques the different principles of utilitarianism and integrity - the moral righteousness that is…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I’ll start by saying that Utilitarianism is the thought that some action is acceptable as long as they will bring more happiness over pain. Mills believed that the best decisions are the decisions that is going to give the most happiness and because of this he was very much criticized many found him selfish. When it came to his principle on greatest happiness he thought that the most moral action is the action that will bring on the most happiness, even if this meant a personal lost for one certain person. So for example if I am in a bank that is being robbed and I am the closet to the emergency call button but I know if I get up to press the button there is an extremely high chance that the robber will shoot me dead…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ross Vs Kant

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As we have become more familiar with the Ross’ theories we can now determine the similarities and differences between him and Kant. Ross did in fact incorporate aspects of Kantian deontology with utilitarian philosophy. He agrees that we are supplied with certain moral rules and duties to which we must abide. He further agrees that it is never the consequence of some action that makes an action right or good. Just like Kant, he might say that we have an obligation not to kill, steal or lie.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The categorical imperative is a moral obligation that is not dependent on the situation of individual, meaning there is a set rule for everyone. A Kantian would say that in order to do something, everyone else must also be allowed to do it. This means that if someone can lie, then everyone can lie, and if someone can steal then everyone can steal. A Kantian would add that if the situation in which you try to achieve your maxim is immoral, do not give up. Rather, you should find a different way in which to achieve the maxim.…

    • 1294 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, giving money to a homeless person just to get him/her to leave you alone would be judged not moral by Kant because it was done for the wrong reason. With Kants belief in mind; if the consequence of immoral behavior were dealt with in a legal structure, people would be prosecuted for "EVERYTHING" since there are no extenuating circumstances. Kant's categorical imperative is a tri-dynamic statement of philosophical thought:(1) " So act that the maxim of you could always hold at the same time as a principle establishing universal law. "(2) "Act so as to treat humanity, whether in your own person in that of another, always as an end and never as a means only.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant imposes the idea of the “purity of the will” which expands on the principle that one should act…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In recent events, James Liang, an employee of 30 years for Volkswagen, came forward admitting to using software to deceive emissions tests in the United States for Volkswagen’s diesel engines. The engines, on average, produce 40 times the legal limits on emissions. After undergoing investigation, it was found that Volkswagen had been involved in this scandal since 2006. In response to public outcry the company has recalled all models using this engine and set aside 16 billion dollars to fix their mistake. However, for Liang after admitting his guilt, he intends to help bring others responsible for the scandal to light.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    My Moral Philosophy

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Moral philosophy is the study of moral judgments or value placed on decision about what is right or wrong, good or bad, just or on just. Business philosophy is the standard, principle or policy placed on who may behave outside the norms of organizational culture, emphasis upon ethical behavior enables employees to know how they should react when faced with ethical dilemmas and the consequences of their actions. MY PERSONAL PHILOSOPHY. As an individual, I believe that keeping a low profile life is very vital to me in a sense that people around me irrespective of their cultural, ethnical and political background.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays