You are not allowed to make exceptions for yourself. For example, if you expect other people to keep their promises, then you are obligated to keep your own promises. If we apply Kant’s theory in social terms, it emphasizes on the respect for the person because each person has moral dignity. Therefore, no person could exclusively treat another as a means to his/her own end. One must make the right decisions for the right reasons.…
Kant effectively quantifies freedom via his argument for his idea of enlightenment, public/private divide, trade off between rational and physical productivity and finally international governance. He runs into problems however in that he fails to effectively quantify the means of acquiring his aspirational goals of perfect moral constitution, universal enlightenment as well as global cosmopolitan governance. The following section will outline first the public private divide followed by means not considered (harm principle) and the second section will outline the means towards global cosmopolitanism as well as the limitations considered. The attainment of enlightenment is one of the highest level of understanding for Kant and correlates…
Kant also talks about maxims and how you see yourself acting on this situation by lying but also knowing that you if you do then you are acting immorally. Reason vs. desire these are the two ways in which you make decision. Kant discusses that reason is the same for all rational creatures which is why you might think letting the murderer know that you have seen the person is crazy but actually isn’t. Kant also uses FEI as an argument to people who think you should lie to the murderer at the door as well. He does this by saying when lying to the murderer at the door you are using the other person merely as a means and by doing this you violate IC or informed consent.…
In “Rejecting All Lies: Immanuel Kant”, an article by Sissela Bok, Bok states that the truth can not be avoided, no circumstance can cause you to withhold the truth. Bok supports her claim by writing about Immanuel Kant who believes that you should not avoid the truth at any time, and having the benefit of being clear and not needing to track the lies you have told. Bok want to show all lies are not okay in any circumstance, whether it’s to save a person’s life, or to spare someone’s feeling.…
People can not violate the human rights or deprive themselves because people consider helping others is not their business. My conclusion is that Kant has a clear idea of how to question ourselves about this simple actions. To be responsible for our own body, life, welfare, happiness and also to be honest, to be a man of honor, and to help others to succeed in life. At the end of the day, we all are human beings striving to survive and pursuing happiness.…
In the eyes to many philosopher’s punishment is seen as a correction method. Regardless of the crime committed, it is still viewed as pain inflicted upon another. Whether it is verbal, physical or emotional. Every state has their own ideologies about why and how an individual should be punished for their crimes. Furthermore, philosophers Immanuel Kant and Jeremy Bentham propose the theories of punishment for how to deal with intentional crimes.…
It was unfair, but as an adage says “you’re always better off with a really good lie”. If one is successful with a lie, it saves them from the…
The unconditional "absoluteness" of Kant 's moral judgements can creates a problem in instances of conflicting rules, or maxims. When deontological theory is applied to an instance of two conflicting absolute rules, such as 'should lie to protect an innocent man, ' it offers no clearly ethical answer. In Kantian theory 'do not lie ' and 'do not let innocent people die ' are both moral rules, and we are obliged to follow both. If forced to choose Kant says that we shouldn 't lie even if we know a innocent person will be killed. The criticism against this is that it is at best unethical, and at the worst Irrational.…
An Exploration of Othello: Delving into the Mind Frame of Desdemona and Iago Immanuel Kant’s view on ethics and morality is that in order to determine if we are acting in a fashion that can be deemed moral, we have not only a duty to ourselves but others. It is duty that determines our actions. Kant establishes certain limitations and restrictions upon the notion of duty, narrowing down a definition which would allow us to therefore be able to readily distinguish “whether the action which agrees with duty is done from duty, or from a selfish view” (Kant 2). In order to figure out whether our actions correspond to this concept of duty, Kant has established what is known as the categorical imperative which states that you should reflect upon your actions and be comfortable with them becoming a universal law. Insofar as duty is concerned, if we follow this principle it allows for a broader understanding of what is meant by moral and ethical behaviour.…
In continuing our ethical discussions surrounding rights and duties, philosopher Immanuel Kant stated that there are a set of moral rules that we must abide by under any circumstance, no matter the consequences. The example provided in this week’s reading suggested the woman hiding in your bushes claiming to running from a man who was trying to kill her. Do you tell the knife-wielding man where the woman was hiding or lie to buy more time, in an attempt to save her life? By trying to prevent the death of the woman, we essentially could have caused her death. The intended result of our lying was to protect the woman but the consequence was her death.…
In the article entitled “Rejecting all lies: Immanuel Kant” Sissela Bok states that only lie if it about something huge like death, harm, or danger. First, Bok mentions “Truthfulness in a statements which cannot be avoided is the formal duty of an individual to everyone, however great may be the disadvantage.” (para 1) The writer discusses that lying is always a disadvantage even if it was protecting someone from evil. In addition she points out “For someone holding such a position to be called a liar was a mortal.”…
One key cost is credibility: Once a person finds out you lied, you lose currency in their eyes. Lying is okay in certain situations although people think is bad. Lying is sometimes okay but it depends on the situation.…
Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…
The next step is determining if it is a perfect duty or imperfect duty. A perfect duty is defined by a maxim contradicting itself. For example if it was morally acceptable to lie then the concept of truth is lost. An imperfect duty is more situational in that it is something one should strive towards. Should one not perform an imperfect duty there is no problem in Kant’s view.…
Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher, held a deontological approach that many use today as the basis of their ethical theory. His philosophy is similar to the Ten Commandments where it is your duty to do what is morally right regardless of the consequences. “Others cannot impose morality and moral obligations on us; we are the only ones who impose such obligations on ourselves. If we are moral, we impose a certain way of acting upon ourselves because we understand what it means to be a moral being” (DeGeorge 63). In order to appreciate his contribution to business ethics, we should first look at Kant’s life and his moral vision.…