Kant's Theory Of Moral Luck

Improved Essays
Ethical ideologies are inherent and play a vital role in our decision to make moral decisions and whether or not those decisions are right or wrong. Two major philosophers that proposed two theories of ethics that gave an understand of what is right or wrong are Kant and Nagel. Kant theorized that the rightness or wrongness of actions doesn’t depend on our consequences but on whether we fulfill our duty. Nagel proposed the idea of Moral Luck and said that Moral Luck occurs when we judge an agent or assign moral blame or praise for an action or it’s consequences even if it is clear that an agent had no control in the situation.
Through the theory of Moral Luck there are four types of non-moral luck that play a factor in the morality of an action
…show more content…
If a duty is contrary to duty, in self interest, considers love then it is not in good will. A Kantian would accept the condition of control because Kant states that when deciding what action to make it be in accordance with the good will (moral worth, in accordance with duty). So, in above scenario where both agents drove home and agent 2 happened to hit and kill a kid (being out of their control) without intending to do so. Kantians would say that because both agents had good intentions and that they both were in accordance with the good will that they were acting in good will (in accordance with duty). Kant’s ethics is more concerned with the motivation (reasoning for doing it) of an agents actions and not the goodness of the consequences of those actions therefore making Kantian ethics a deontological ethical theory meaning its an ethical position that judged the morality of an actions based on duty, obligation, or rule. A Kantian ethicist would first consider what actions are “right” actions and proceed from there. In regards to Constitutive luck, Kant would say that constitutive luck doesn’t exist for rational agents because if people are rational then moral action and knowledge is available to everyone according to Grounding. (Everyone has the opportunity to be good). But, if the scenario above agent 2 still hit the kid since their action had good intent and in accordance with duty (because good intention=good will=accordance to duty) then what agent 2 did wasn’t morally wrong. Kant isn’t concerned with consequences Regardless of agent 2 hitting and killing a kid that jumped out in the middle of the street it is absurd for agent 2 to be more or less culpable for the action because it was out of their

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    We are free to act in way’s that are moral or immoral because according to this theory, our intentions are more meaningful than the outcome. Kant explains that, “A good will is not good because of what it effects or accomplishes-because of its fitness for attaining some proposed end: it is good through its willing along- that is good in itself (pg. 110). ” If we make the conscience effort to do good, we are inherently good. If our objectives are to cause harm, we are inherently bad. If we intend to do good but the outcome does not work in our favour, we are still seen as good since…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Steven Cahn’s book, Exploring Ethics, we learn about many philosophers and their approach on ethics. Ethics is considered to be the moral principles that govern a person 's or group 's behavior. (Wikipedia) Cahn takes us in to the approaches by Immanuel Kant, John Stuart Mills, Aristotle and Virginia Held. Each philosopher had a very different view on morals and how we should approach them but we also find similarities throughout their views. Immanuel Kant believes that good will is defined by duty.…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    What is the capacity in which things that are not under your control can affect the amount of moral responsibility that you face? For this topic, there are generally three main views that claim to answer this question, and they are each rather simple; first, there are those that think that people are only blameworthy for things that are under their control. Second, there are those who think that people are blameworthy for things that are not under their control, and lastly, there are those that restrict the second view, such that they can compromise between both views. In this paper, I will discuss the first two views only, providing arguments for the second view as well as possible counterarguments from those that think the first view is correct.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In response to the above critique, this section will explore how Nagel might defend his argument. It does not suffice to examine moral luck in hypothetical situations. Moral luck is only applicable under real circumstances and to give it a suppositious critique is degrading to Nagel’s original argument. It is also important to clarify the term “luck,” and what it means when something is affected by luck. Lastly, if we accept the critique then it is crucial we consider how to apply judgment without involving factors of luck.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nagel develops the idea of moral luck to challenge and perhaps replace what he terms the condition of control, which is the idea that people cannot be morally evaluated, and thus held morally responsible, if they did not have control over the event (Nagel, 723-724). We often evoke this notion in situations where someone commits a terrible act, but there was some aspect of the world they could not control that led to the situation. For example, if a person is driving down the road safely, following all laws, and a child jumps in front of her and dies from the accident, the driver would not be morally judged for this action, as she could not have prevented it. However, Nagel suggests there are indeed times when morally evaluate people who do not control a significant aspect of what they do or have done.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Examples Of Moral Luck

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Moral luck occurs whenever luck makes a moral difference in two or more cases. The problem of moral luck arises from a conflict between the widely held intuition that moral luck should not occur in moral judgment with the fact that it is arguably impossible to prevent it from happening. Before getting into the problem which luck occurs and makes a moral difference, let’s look at a case to test an intuition. Suppose, there is a person A behind me who is tripped by the uneven floor, and the person pushed me without any harmful intention. I failed onto the ground and accidentally triggered the switch of the sluice to let all the water to flood down, causing death of some people and millions of government fund.…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Explanations

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages

    a person’s standards of behavior or beliefs concerning what is and is not acceptable for them to do. This essay intends point out the relevant aspects of moral theologians, Kant, Mill, Aristotle and Held and to answer the question of the best suited approach in resolving ethical problems and dilemmas. Kant I have found that Kant’s theory is the most complicated and confusing of the four. It was only made somewhat clear by the explanation in O’Neill’s reading.…

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thomas Nagel is an American philosopher who is currently a philosophy professor at New York University. In his essay, published in 1976, Nagel indicates that the problem of moral luck arises from a clash between our application and intuition most people share about morality. He states the intuition as, “Prior to reflection it is intuitively plausible that people cannot be morally assessed for what is not their fault, or for what is due to factors beyond their control” (Nagel 138). Nagel then goes on to give a definition of moral luck. He says, “Where a significant aspect of what someone does depends on factors beyond his control, yet we continue to treat him in that respect as an object of moral judgment, it can be called moral luck” (Statman 59).…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nagel Moral Luck

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The concept of moral luck has been analyzed by many forbearers. This idea states that the actions people make depend on factors that are out of their control, yet we continue to treat them as the object of moral judgement. Nagel identifies the problem of moral luck as a conflict between our actions and principles that most share about mortality. He brings up a plausible idea that people cannot be morally judged for what is not their fault, or by factors that are out of their control. Nagel describes moral luck by using the example of a drunk driver.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American Philosopher Thomas Nagel, has spent time examining a forthcoming with a theory about moral luck. His main attention consists of studying and evaluating philosophy of mind, ethics and political philosophy. Nagel identifies four ways in which luck centers a part in moral duty. He raises the bar with the question of whether luck can affect judgement of morality. I argue that Nagel's theory of Moral Luck is substantial and one that has all the basic groundings for Me to believe its precise.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy “The field of ethics (or moral philosophy) involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong behavior,” (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy). We have learned throughout this class that ethics is a moral value that differs from person to person but what makes up ethics? Ethical theories are a huge part of ethics; however, many of the theories differ in more than one way. In this essay two theories will be focused on and outlined, those theories being, ethical egoism and Kant’s theory of good will. In the outline regarding these theories I will cover the strengths of both theories, what type of dilemmas the theories can cover and lastly there will be some criticism…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The rightness or wrongness of actions does not depend on their consequences, but on whether the moral reason is “from duty”. Actions done “in conformity with duty” or out of self-interest, have no moral worth to Kant. Duty is defined as an individual’s rational understanding of the action their pursuing. This relates to an action’s maxim, which is what you’re doing and why you’re doing it. Two main principles are used to further Kant’s theory, one being the principle of universalizability.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant's Theory Of Causation

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Kant attributes Hume as his inspiration to the critique of pure reason as Hume’s work motivated him to prove Hume wrong. Specifically, Kant worked against Hume’s concept of causation. Where Hume found no necessity in causation nor of causation, Kant found causation necessary in both senses- otherwise no one would be able to navigate the world. However, Kant’s critique of Hume is much more general than causation, Kant through causation is asserting the existence of synthetic a priori judgements.…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s theory is based on the moral law and duty as an action that should be treated respectfully. By ‘moral dilemma’ we understand the heart-wrenching decision that carries strong intuitive and emotional weight and can lead to a failure of duty (Garlikov 2). This action is influenced by the individual’s desire to act within the principles of the duty. Immanuel Kant explains that an individual can only do the right thing for the right reason, even though acting on duty is not always sufficient, as it can lead a person to do the right thing for the wrong reason. Acting from duty is the only justification what makes this law absolute and universal.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the branch of normative ethics, a person discerns what is right or wrong behavior. There are several theories about what is right or wrong conduct, but two of the most popular ideas is Utilitarianism and Kantianism. Both set up strict methods of deciding how a person would know what the right thing to do in a situation would be. On one hand, utilitarianism claims that you can use intuition to discern what the greatest good for the greatest number of people is. On the other side, Kantianism claims that you can use reasoning and logic to discern moral obligations and rules.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics