Kant And Morally Good

1471 Words 6 Pages
At first glance, moral good humans appear to appeal to the well thought out philosophical view; the truth of moral judgments is relative to the innate sense of whether a human is morally good or morally bad at birth. The basic definition of morally good and bad is that all moral points of view are equal, no one has morals that are any righter or wrong than any other person in this world. As you look closer at the points people use to justify their claims, you can plainly see that there are, more often than not, viable objections that can be made against any of the arguments for morally good, bad, and neutral. Humans born morally good suggest that a baby is born with an innate sense of morality. For example, researchers at Yale University begin …show more content…
Kant does not think that good will is not the same as the phrases, ‘he’s good hearted’, she’s good natured’, and ‘she mean’s well’ because they are ordinary notions. The idea of a good person is ideally closer to the idea of ‘the good will’. Kant’s idea of good will is what makes a good person is his possession of a will that is in certain way determined by, or makes their decisions on the basis of moral law. The only way a person can achieve good will is the idea of one who only makes decisions based on she holds to be morally worth taking moral considerations I themselves to be conclusive reasons to guide her behavior. This sort of character is what a person highly values. Kant believes that we value it without any limitation of qualification. I believe that he means two things, there is no conceivable circumstance in which we regard our own moral goodness as worth forfeiting simply in order to obtain some desirable object. The second meaning is possessing or maintaining one’s moral goodness is the very condition under which anything is worth having or pursuing. What Kant is trying the say is the terms of good will are the decisions of those who have morally demands based on the moral …show more content…
Hobbes felt that the natural state of man was akin to be beast like. Therefore, civilization steps in and degrades humanity from moral corruption. In Hobbes view, human nature is a terrible thing that our culture rescues. In Hobbes view human nature is bad and civilization is good. Without civilization we would be doomed and degrade to a beast-like state. For example, a parent will tend to thing that their child is unruly, undisciplined, and selfish. Hobbes is not suggesting that a child is evil, he is suggesting that a child doesn’t know any better. A child needs to be trained and have some set of structure in their lives to have some sense of good in themselves. I disagree with this statement because a child is born with the thoughts of whether their conscious believes whether something is good or bad when their doing something. They have an innate sense of good within them. Whether a child is doing something good or bad they still have a conscious of what they are doing id right or wrong. It is just a choice of whether the child feels a sense of satisfaction of that action to determine whether they will

Related Documents