Kahnerman's Rational Choice Theory

Superior Essays
The problem with this application of the theory is that Joan has created an elaborate fraud that carried on for 18 months. Kahnerman, in his research found that those with an addiction problem such as gambling do not possess the ability to properly predict future gains from their current actions (Krstic, 2014). This would mean that she committed her actions because of her addiction and her inability to weight future consequences, and thus reducing her rationality and free will. The theory would then be able to function since Joan was deprived of her rationality and free will. As well, rational choice theory is not a universal explanation, meaning it is simply a tool that can help explain one facet of a phenomenon (Lovett, 2016). As such, it …show more content…
To be precise, the key contributor to criminality is a low self-control so people who possess this trait have a great likelihood of committing a crime versus those with a high level of self- control who are less likely to commit a crime. As well, one's ability to control themselves does not change throughout one's life (McMullen, 1999) so if you are born with low self-control, then that trait will stick with you throughout your life and is a trait that you cannot rid yourself of. Hirschi and Gottfredson also believe that low self-control is a trait built through "ineffective or incomplete socialization" (McMullen, 1999, p.4). This includes isolation, improper parenting, and childhood shaming and because of this, the early years of a child's development are crucial to the development of self- control. These conclusions made by Hirschi and Gottfredson is all based on their research in which they found that although there are many different types of criminals and every crime scenario is unique, there exists a common trait that was found among them, which is low self-control (McMullen, 1999). As such, they concluded that criminality is a by product self-control (McMullen, …show more content…
Low self-control theory believes that the main cause of crime is low self-control, while rational choice theory believes that a free will that is influenced by social, economic, and history may dictate whether the crime will be committed. The response from the criminal justice system in turn will be different. The response to rational choice theory will focus on the severity, the certainty, and the swiftness of a punishment to attempt to deter people from committing a crime (Tibbetts & Hemmens, 2014) whereas the response to low self-control theory may be early childhood programs to attempt to improve their levels of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Social control theory is the theory that seeks answers as to why. The theory assumes that people will and can violate the law. Gottfredson and Hirschi argue that a person 's tendency to commit crime can be found on his or her levels of self control. Self Control involves a person 's ability to control their own behavior. Gottfredson and Hirschi also argued that lack of self control is caused by inadequate child rearing.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Biological, Sociological, and Psychological Theories It is not secret that people are out committing crimes every day in the streets of our communities. Over the years there have been many theories developed in order to help understand why it is that people decide to take part in some of these criminal acts, while some people stand together and claim that this is a result of poor parenting and others arguing that it is due to the environment that the child is around. Regardless of one’s point of view, it is very clear that crimes are occurring and that biological, sociological, and psychological theories have been developed in an attempt to help understand why it is that some individuals take part in these crimes. There are many things that…

    • 1013 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Four Social Bonds

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In module four reading covers a broad view of elements in explaining the causation of crime. As many scholars invested heavily in extensive research to understanding the scope of crime; expressly Hirsch emphasized on the importance of social bonds that are lacking in many communities which often lead to criminality. He further explains that lack of the four social bonds could result to a greater probability of delinquency and whereas the greater social bond likely to have the opposite effect. Although scholars in previous chapter focused on biological factors as well as free will, and Shaw and McKay’s concluded that delinquency flourishes in poor neighborhoods as opposed to more affluent communities. As will be discussed below Hirsch’s reject the classical school tenet of individualism…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction Throughout the semester, we have been learning about the different types of theories of crime. From the least parsimony theory, to the most parsimony theory, Gottfredson and Hirschi 's general theory of crime. I decided to pick Gottfredson and Hirschi 's general theory of crime because, it 's the most accepted and most valid theories of crime. Logical Consistency The six dimensions of self control that Gottfredson and Hirschi state are impulsive, risk taking, physical, simple, self centered, and temper.…

    • 1703 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question one Informal social control, collective efficacy, and social capital all play an important role when it comes to preventing neighborhood crime efforts. Informal social control does not involve any formal social institutions such as the police. Instead, it involves a group of individuals outside the government spectrum that come together to try to prevent crime for the common good. This concept is often hard to achieve when individuals cannot conform and help define social norms.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This theory alleges to address all types of crime that Hirschi's first theory in Causes of Delinquency did not, but many simply find Gottfredson and Hirschi's definition of crime to be unconvincing. Though studies in general support the theory's major conclusion that low self-control is linked to criminal involvement, they do make some valid points regarding weaknesses inherent in the self-control theory of crime. In A General Theory of Crime Gottfredson and Hirschi offer no general or specific empirical test of the theory (Akers 1991). This makes their claims seem grandiose, though the major view appears to be true. The theory has also been accused of being tautological, because they do not define self-control separately from the propensity to commit crimes and analogous behavior (Akers 1991).…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction “He who does not prevent a crime when he can, encourages it”, a quote from Lucius Annaeus Seneca that helps describe how society views and “prevents” crime. Criminal theories attempt to construct views on how to prevent and fight crime but often the criminal justice system is working against society. The two theories that are explained within are the social learning theory and rational choice theory. These theories will construct views as to how and why the seven crimes are committed using the concepts within the theories.…

    • 2208 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to this criminological research, low-self-control is the cause of crimes and delinquency. Most studies find related concepts between low self-control and antisocial behaviors, whereas this article focus mainly in low self-control. Criminologists believe low self-control is caused by parenting skills, peers, bad health, finical issues, or school and neighborhood environments. An individual with a low self-control is impelled to be careless, coldhearted, unwary, and quiet will most likely have criminal acts. Most of these aggressive behaviors are caused by parenting skills, they emphasize on child's behavior.…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In simple terms, rational choice theory is the view that crime is a function of a decision making process, in which the potential offender weighs the potential costs and benefits…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Crime and social behavior go hand in hand and this is thoroughly expressed throughout hundreds of different theories created my Criminologists. Travis Hirschi believed that there were multiple sections that interconnected and contributed to a person bond to society. These sections are involvement, belief, commitment, attachment, and motivation. This is not only a major influence on criminal behavior and delinquency but typically in most studies, it is found that anti-social tendencies are proven to affect delinquency and criminal activity in not only the adolescent stages of life but also the later stages of life. Hirschi and Gottfredson actually disagree with this theory, stating that more social people actually are more likely to commit a crime.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction Rational Choice Theory developed out of classical criminology, a theory developed by Cesare Beccaria (Siegel 2010: 96). Beccaria maintined that people should make their decisions based of fear of being punished, but believed in fair punishment for the crime (Siegel 2010: 96). Rational Choice Theory is a misnomer because it isn’t, in fact, a theory, but a heuristic model (de Haan & Vos 2009:30). A heuristic model can be assessed in terms of how useful it is, but cannot be proven or disproven (de Haan & Vos 2009:30). Rational choice views the process of committing a crime as making a set of choices that result in the crime taking place (Joubert 2014: 15).…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Oulasvirta and Hukkinen even state in their conclusion that in a different environment their study may not be applicable. In a study, one should be able to assume that the results will be the same inside and outside of the laboratory with little variance. This fact alone brings to light that this study has no real result in either direction. It is very evident that the little research that has been done to prove whether choice overload has any effect on people sways dramatically in both directions with no conclusive evidence that it even…

    • 1013 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This theory focuses on two pathways that individuals travel down, but instead of saying the reason for criminal activity is that we are “born” with it, they give a reason that says our environment and the interactions we have with those in our lives. They do not totally discount the fact that some individuals suffer from neuropsychological disadvantages, but these coupled with environmental and social aspects increase criminal behavior; not just these deficiencies alone cause it. One major difference in the two theories is that this one identifies life processes that we move through that has a direct impact on our behavior. These are called “turning points” and occur when we get married and when we have a meaningful career.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rational choice theory “states that people will make rational decisions based on the extent to which they expect the choice to maximize or minimize their profits or benefits and minimize the costs and losses” (Akers et al, 2017). In classical criminology people believed that offenders calculated the rewards and punishments before offending. Individuals may still engage in crime after having indirect experiences through general deterrence such as punishment avoidance. For example, a 15 year old might make the rational choice to shoplift from a candy store because one of her friends has done it before and the entire store did make her leave and the friend was still able to keep the stolen items. Through the fifteen year olds indirect experience with her friend avoiding legal punishment after committing a crime, the fifteen year old make the rational decision that the benefits of stealing outweighed the consequences.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many factors taken into consideration when individuals commit crimes such as, the punishment one would receive, the success they would receive and who it would benefit. Crime is broken for personal reasons, it is a cost benefit analysis (Hayward, 2007). The offender determines the advantage of criminal behaviour. Rational choice theory assumes that an individual is egotistic (Boudon, 2003). It is perceived that an individual who commits an unlawful act is mainly concerned with only themselves.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays