Juvenile Justice: The Negative Effects Of Teenage Brains

Superior Essays
teenage brains are not yet fully developed, affecting the way a juvenile acts, thinks, and feels. It can have an affect on the actions a juvenile males, it can make them more likely to take risks than adults. During their teenage years, some people have not yet developed their morals. It is a time when they may start to. A child has not had enough time to develop their morals and fully distinguish right from wrong. They might have just been at the wrong place at the wrong time and git themselves involved in crimes activity, resulting in a life sentence. Some people believe that children are old enough to know exactly what they are doing. Jenkins gives an example of this in her Juvenile Justice Information Exchange article "On Punishment …show more content…
It can cause more harm than good. Being sent to live in a cell is not good for kids, they can never be prepared for that. John Schwartz speaks about a case in which there was a terrible consequence of giving a child a life sentence. In his article "Rethinking juvenile justice :after years of moving in the opposite direction, many states are now making it harder to try teen offenders in the adult justice system" in the New York Times Upfront, he reveals, "Left alone in his cell despite his frantic pleas not to be isolated, he tightened his bedsheets around his neck and took his own life" (Schwartz). This boy committed suicide because he could not deal with the reality of having to live the rest of his life in a prison cell. No one wants to live that way. Death must have seemed like a better option than rotting in a cell. For a child, that is all too much to handle. Being separated from the outside world when that is all they knew can cause the child a lot of trauma. They can begin to become depressed, leading to them wanting to take their lives or they can even go insane. It doesn 't just affect the child, it also affects their family, friends, and other loved ones. The family will no longer get to have their baby at home. Their child will never again be able to attend Christmas parties, Thanksgiving dinners, or any other kind of celebrations. Their family will be changed, it won 't be the same with their child …show more content…
A life sentence without parole is cruel and unusual punishment. Living life caged up like an animal is wrong. Patricia Smith 's New York Times Upfront article "Crime & Punishment: the Supreme Court recently struck down mandatory sentences of life without parole for juveniles. The ruling signals a shift in how the law treats young offenders" speaks upon the Miller v Alabama and the Jackson v Hobbs cases stating, "The Supreme Court rules that mandatory life without parole is unconstitutional for all juvenile offenders, even murderers" (Smith). She is saying that the Supreme Court agrees that automatically sentencing a juvenile to life without parole goes against a person 's rights. It violates the Eighth

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He just turned twenty-five. Kids should not serve life sentence since are whole life we go off our impulses. That is why we get into some many fights and make dumb mistakes we aren’t thinking correctly because we have something missing from us. So many kids have been sentenced to life thinking they were helping themselves but are only hurting themselves in the end. The kids want something to stop or get out of a bad situation but only end up in jail for the rest of their life.…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    High Risk of Reoffending One of the liveliest debates over the United States’ imprisonment system today (as well as the systems of other countries) concerns juvenile offenders. On the one hand, the debate consists of acknowledging that they are children. It is believed that juvenile offenders have not had the chance to fully mold their lives, and are very often merely products of the environments in which they have grown up. On the other hand, it is proven that many juveniles are capable of committing crimes every bit as heinous as fully grown adults. The case of juvenile offenders presents a unique problem for systems of criminal punishments and deterrence.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even though the juvenile commits such heinous act, others should know that children cannot function their brain properly just yet. Juveniles at a certain age period where they know what they are doing with their actions, but at the same time not know. In the article, Locked Away Forever? by Adam Liptak,…

    • 1972 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If their kids do violent crimes, it means that parents lack of taking care of their kids and giving them good suggestions to become a good person. When parents do not take care of their children enough, their children will do something excessively, so they should be penalized for kid’s crimes as same as their kids should. The age of adolescence to treat a juvenile crime as adults should be lower. “In recent years, many states have enacted changes in their juvenile crime laws, and some have lowered the age at which a juvenile can be tried as an adult for certain violent crimes” (Collier par.5). The range of age to judge the kid as an adult should not be more than eighteen years old in some states.…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juvenile crime has been always going on within our country. Juveniles commit crimes every day; whether it’s stealing something non-luxurious from a store or to even be able to end with a life. Those who commit such horrendous actions such as being able to take someone’s life should be sentenced to life in prison or in some cases, death. But the question still stands: what if it is an adolescent who murdered somebody, should they be sentenced to life in prison or even sentenced to walk death row? I believe that juveniles should not receive life in prison but rather an evaluation on their mental health to see why they acted in such a way.…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri Supreme Court acknowledged and reversed Simmons’ death sentence to life imprisonment without the eligibility of parole (FinbLaw, 2017). Simmon's death sentence was overturned on grounds that the opinions of the public and national learned organizations reflect a consensus that would not support such executions (FindLaw, 2017). They acknowledged that the execution of juveniles violated the Eighth Amendment against cruel and unusual punishment based on the standards of decency test. The state of Missouri appealed the ruling upholding that the death penalty for crimes committed by 16…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A series of appeals followed the case to the state and federal courts that lasted until 2002, when the U.S. Supreme Court decided that the execution of the mentally ill and minors violated the 8th and 14th amendment. With the 5 to 4 vote, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Simmons and set aside Simmons’ death sentence in favor of life in prison without eligibility for release. The Supreme Court ruled that the execution of minors is cruel and punishment prohibited by the 8th…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Repeal Capital Punishment

    • 2254 Words
    • 9 Pages

    This mean they have to kill another person to help one family get over a death that has to happen and this will result in the families feeling an injustice so it 's hard either way you put it. It 's other ways to bring a family closure to also but this would play a huge role because no one would follow through with the Death Penalty because they know if they did their consequence would be death. This would be a key factor…

    • 2254 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life In Prison Analysis

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He still had the maximum punishment. Jonathan was wrong for not going to the authorities and he was also wrong for shooting someone. Yes Jonathan deserve to be incarcerated but he didn’t deserve that maximum amount of time and he didn’t deserve the experience that he had in prison. His mother said, “When children are placed with adults…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 2003, Andre Thomas viciously attacked and killed his ex-wife and her two children, and was sentenced to death row. His defense argued that he was not eligible for death row because of his mental state. The court ignored the argument and passed it off, saying that they were using his illness as an excuse to “get out of” maximum punishment. As demonstrated in this case, mental illness is not given the attention it deserves when determining a sentence. Cases such as these have aroused concern how fair the criminal court is towards the mentally ill.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays