After hearing their son 's sentence, and receiving a harsher punishment than an adult, the parents raised a petition to rehear the case. According to “Facts and case summary: In re Gault 387 U.S. 1(1967)” on www.uscourts.gov. It was the Supreme Court that had decided that “...juveniles facing an adjudication of delinquency and incarceration are entitled to...the Due Process Clause...”. After review of the case by the Supreme Court, they had found it to be in violation of the fourteenth amendment but, saw the punishment as a correction instead of a
After hearing their son 's sentence, and receiving a harsher punishment than an adult, the parents raised a petition to rehear the case. According to “Facts and case summary: In re Gault 387 U.S. 1(1967)” on www.uscourts.gov. It was the Supreme Court that had decided that “...juveniles facing an adjudication of delinquency and incarceration are entitled to...the Due Process Clause...”. After review of the case by the Supreme Court, they had found it to be in violation of the fourteenth amendment but, saw the punishment as a correction instead of a