Juvenile crime is overwhelming throughout the country and most states have enacted laws allowing convicted juveniles to be tried as an adult and sentenced to death for serious crimes. This case addresses the issue of whether sentencing a youth to death for a crime he or she committed during the age of sixteen and seventeen is cruel and unusual punishment in violation On evening of January 7, 1981, in Jefferson County, Kentucky, Kevin Stanford, age 17 years and 4 months committed the murder of Barbel Poore. Stanford along with his accomplice constantly raped and sodomized Poore during and after their commission of a robbery at Checkers gasoline station located on Can Run Road. Afterwards Poore was driven to a secluded area where…
The court looked back on the history of the execution of juveniles and found that the rates of capital punishment to juveniles had been reducing in frequency. To support the holding, the Courts also looked to other countries and how they handled the execution of juveniles guilty of murder. And found that many of the countries had discontinued the practice of the death penalty for minors. On a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri, Justice Stevens and Justice Ginsburg concurred that the evolving standards of decency do change our understandings of the Constitution and if the interpretation of the Amendment held when it was originally drafted it would allow for the execution of 7-year-old children today. Justice Scalia, Chief Justice and Justice Thomas dissented as they felt that the meaning of the Eighth Amendment should be “determined by the subjective views of the members of the court and like-minded foreigner”.…
Case Summary #3: Roper, V. Simmons, 2005. This is a case that involved a series of appeals against the sentencing to death of Christopher Simmons, a AuthorLastName3 minor aged 17 years. Although an earlier appeals even in the Supreme Court found the execution of a minor constitutional, the decision was overturned by the same court in 2002, arguing that opinion in the general public had changed in favor of not executing minors. The court argued that, apart from the change in public opinion, executing minors was a disproportionate punishment that was no longer…
The Supreme Court ruled, “Capital punishment must be limited to offenders who commit a narrow category of the most serious crimes and extreme culpability makes them deserving of execution.” www.casebriefs.com This is due to the fact that juveniles lack maturity and understanding of responsibility. They are also more vulnerable or susceptible to negative influences and outside pressures. The courts also noted that the character of a juvenile is not as well formed as an adult.…
There is no doubt that the two separate cases of Roper v. Simmons and Thompson v. Oklahoma the act of murder was committed by minors who were tried, convicted, and deserving of a fitting punishment. However, in this analogy between the primary and secondary analogue, the argument of Roper v. Simmons is if a minor under the age of 18 should be sentenced to Capital Punishment, and if doing so is a direct violation of the Eighth Amendment citing cruel and unusual punishment (Roper v. Simmons, 2005). The Supreme Court ruled in the case of Thompson v. Oklahoma, “that executing persons for crimes committed at age 15 or younger constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment” (Roper v. Simmons, 2005). In part, because Oklahoma’s death penalty statute set no minimum age limit in which he or she would be sentenced to death (Flaherty, 2002).…
Kentucky as the basis for sentencing juveniles to death for murder. Prior to Roper v. Simmons Courts could issue juveniles under 18 but older than 15 death sentences for murder ("Juveniles and the Death Penalty," n.a., p. 1). Roper v. Simmons overruled Standard v. Kentucky thus making the sentencing anyone under the age of 18 when the crime was committed unconstitutional. In my opinion, in a case like Simmons, adult court is where the trial and sentencing needed to be held.…
The U.S. Supreme Court would judge the case on whether sentencing a fourteen-year-old to life in prison without parole violates the Eight and Fourteenth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment (Carrizales & Schultz, n.d.). Miller’s counsel argued that sentencing a fourteen-year-old to life without parole without considering certain factors such as his age violates the Eight and Fourteenth Amendments’ ban on cruel and unusual punishment (Carrizales & Schultz, n.d.). The state of Alabama argued that punishing a fourteen-year-old to life without parole does not violate the Eight or Fourteenth Amendment, but serves a justifiable penological goal when the crime is aggravated murder (Carrizales & Schultz,…
Juveniles and Capitol Punishment: Extending Eight Amendment protections Samuel Joseph Joest Arizona State University Abstract Introduction Is it cruel to sentence a minor to death? Is it right to end the life of a juvenile so early with no chance to rehabilitate and change into a better person? What about sentencing them to life without the chance of parole? Never getting the chance to be rehabilitated to more mature people. In the early days of the justice system, juveniles were treated no different from adults and were sentenced to the same punishments.…
Others may argue that it’s not right because there are laws that prohibit youngsters to complete certain actions like smoking, drinking, or going to R movies, these actions don’t seem to affect other it might affect them, however, once they commit a horrifying crime they are being tried as adults. In addition, Lundstrom argues that “Today we are witness to criminal defendants facing a life sentence without parole…” (Lundstrom, 10). Lundstrom continues by stating that juveniles cannot shave and still play with toys also they act scenes from their favorite T.V. shows. Further information that researchers have studies on teen brains with technology that maps the patterns of brain growth in children and teenagers, has given information that indicate that teenagers are having a massive loss of brain tissue this scientific evidence has also sparked the opponents, and argue that this evidence is why juveniles should not be facing life sentence in prison without parole.…
Children ranging from the ages of thirteen and up have been tried in court as adults and are faced with harsh sentences to die in prison without the slightest consideration of their circumstances and age for the offense penalized against them. Justice Elena Kagan, writing for the majority, determined that “requiring that all children convicted of homicide receive lifetime incarceration without possibility of parole, regardless of their age and age-related characteristics and the nature of their crimes” is a violation of the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment (Cost of Mass Incarceration). According to Stevenson, “The U.S. is also the only country with life sentences without parole for 13 year-olds…. kids don’t have the judgment, the maturity, the impulse control and insight necessary to make complicated lifelong decisions. They can’t make the same kind of long-term judgments.…
In the article Death Penalty for Teens, Frank W. Heft JR thinks that the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment for teens. While David Smith thinks that the death penalty for teens is not cruel and unusual punishment, they both have different views points about this matter and they do not agree. Heft and Smith disagree on juvenile capital punishment in three different areas, physical maturity which includes age, state law versus federal law, and emotional maturity that refers to the ability to understand, and manage their emotions and the ability to respond to the environment in the appropriate manner. Because of their disagreement on age maturity, and emotional maturity, federal law and states law, it leaves the reader undecided…
Juvenile’s brains are also not fully developed. This made it unconstitutional to sentence juveniles to life without the possibility of parole. I think this is a fair law because juveniles may be completely different once they hit adult hood, but the case of Miller V. Alabama made me feel differently. I still believe that he should be sentenced heavily. At the time of his crime he was fourteen, and fourteen year olds know that it is not right to murder someone.…
The opposition believes that juveniles should be allowed to be sentenced to mandatory life in prison.the opposition claims that recent brain research made on teen brains has nothing to do with teens committing crime. Author of On Punishment and Teen Killers, Jennifer Jenkins claims that, “ Advocates often repeat, but truly misunderstand brain research on this issue. The actual science does not… in any way negate criminal culpability” (Jenkins). The idea behind this statement is that the recent research on teenage brains is invalid for proving a juvenile less innocent. This idea is highly disagreeable because juveniles are nothing like adults especially in decision making.…
Has the court sentenced the minor due to the evidence presented and the extent of the case? (Aggravated Murder). Miller argues, these amendments have been violated because of his age, while the state argues, the crime was determined aggravated murder, and so sentencing is justifiable and appropriate. Throughout the trail similar cases such as Roper v. Simmons (2005), and Graham v. Florida (2010), worked in Miller’s favor by using the information in the trail. Roper v. Simmons was a cased based on, if juveniles were able to be sentenced to the death penalty due to a murder.…
The decision of juveniles being tried as adults in the world of criminal justice has usually been an object of controversy. Some agree that an adolescent who commits a serious crime like murder deserves to be penalized exactly like an adult; while others declare that a minor should not face the same punishment as an adult. However, no matter how severe or appalling a crime may be, juveniles should not be tried as adults; the reason being that everyone should be granted the chance to learn from their mistakes. Juveniles should not be punished as adults, simply because they biologically distinct from adults. Teenagers are the midsection between children and adults.…