Juvenile Cruel And Unusual Punishment Analysis

Improved Essays
On the twenty-fifth of June 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that sentencing juvenile murderers to life in prison without parole fell under the category of “cruel and unusual punishment”, which violates the eighth amendment of the U.S. Constitution. However, four members of the Supreme Court disagreed, as the prompt of this essay states that, “...mandatory sentences reflected the will of American society that heinous crimes committed by juveniles should always be punished with a life sentence to prison.” The debate on this topic still continues today, and while those who are against the Supreme Court ruling have valid arguments, they fail to comprehend the fact that juveniles still cannot understand the consequences of their actions, thus, making

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Crime Simmons Case Study

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The court looked back on the history of the execution of juveniles and found that the rates of capital punishment to juveniles had been reducing in frequency. To support the holding, the Courts also looked to other countries and how they handled the execution of juveniles guilty of murder. And found that many of the countries had discontinued the practice of the death penalty for minors. On a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri, Justice Stevens and Justice Ginsburg concurred that the evolving standards of decency do change our understandings of the Constitution and if the interpretation of the Amendment held when it was originally drafted it would allow for the execution of 7-year-old children today. Justice Scalia, Chief Justice and Justice Thomas dissented as they felt that the meaning of the Eighth Amendment should be “determined by the subjective views of the members of the court and like-minded foreigner”.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of Roper versus Simmons, the question at hand is whether the execution of a human being who was17 years old when he committed a murder violated the Eight and Fourteenth Amendments pertaining to cruel and unusual punishment (Elrod and Ryder, 2014). These Amendments forbid the obligation of the death penalty for those who suffered from a mental disability and who were insane should be prohibited from a sentence of capital punishment (Elrod and Ryder, 2014). According to the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution, it was lawful to execute a juvenile delinquent who was 15 years older but younger than 18 when he committed a capital crime (Elrod and Ryder, 2014). Roper versus Simmons paved the way in the judicial…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Re Gault Case Essay

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first case that stuck out with me the most was the In re Gault case of 1967. This case focused on a youth named Gerald Gault who was 15 at the time of the supposed offense. I feel this kid was railroad from the beginning his rights were violated in many ways. He did not receive the right to counsel, notice of charges, questioning of witness because the witness did not show up for the proceedings, protection against self-incrimination, a transcript of the proceeding, nor and appellate review all these things were denied. www.ncjrs.gov I believe it was important in establishing the due process clause of the 14th Amendment which was violated.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roper Vs Simmons Essay

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There is no doubt that the two separate cases of Roper v. Simmons and Thompson v. Oklahoma the act of murder was committed by minors who were tried, convicted, and deserving of a fitting punishment. However, in this analogy between the primary and secondary analogue, the argument of Roper v. Simmons is if a minor under the age of 18 should be sentenced to Capital Punishment, and if doing so is a direct violation of the Eighth Amendment citing cruel and unusual punishment (Roper v. Simmons, 2005). The Supreme Court ruled in the case of Thompson v. Oklahoma, “that executing persons for crimes committed at age 15 or younger constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment” (Roper v. Simmons, 2005). In part, because Oklahoma’s death penalty statute set no minimum age limit in which he or she would be sentenced to death (Flaherty, 2002).…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal Justice Frontline’s video, “Second Chance Kids,” takes its viewers through a controversial topic: life in prison for those who committed crimes as teens. Before the mid 2000s, teenagers who murdered someone get sentenced to life without parole. The arguments that teenagers grow up and change convinced courts to reconsider giving parole to those who were convicted for their crimes made as a teen. In one case, Anthony Rolon was 17 years old when he committed a crime. He was helping his father with selling drugs but a party next doors got really loud.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Children committing heinous crimes are not a rare occurrence anymore; the upsetting reality requires new tactics for dealing with young juveniles. Some Americans believe children should be tried as adults, yet others feel that they are too young to understand their wrong doings. In most conditions minors are quickly told they are too young or too old for something, however before being sent to an adult facility we need to contemplate all aspects of the case in order to decided whether or not being tried as an adult is necessary. Regardless of the crime, some people feel that an adult facility is not a suitable environment for children to serve their sentences.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life Sentence

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kenneth Young was 14 when he was convicted and received four life sentences. While the brains of the operation, a 24 year-old black male was only sentenced for only a single life sentence. Yes both roughly the same length but it’s apparent that the adolescents are treated unfairly in the court systems. The worst part of the injustice system is that one of the biggest, most biased factors that play a role in deciding the final discipline is…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One reason why juveniles should not receive life in prison without parole is the undeveloped thinking process that occurs. This is further explored in the article, “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains,” by Paul Thompson, an assistant professor of neurology at the University of California, Los Angeles. In the article, Thompson focuses on the cognitive development of the juvenile brain and compares it with the brain of a full grown adult. He uses an example of a juvenile being tried as an adult for second-degree murder to point out how when questioned, the juvenile was unable to give a reason for his actions. He then reports on findings about the teenage brain that he and his research team had discovered.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Others may argue that it’s not right because there are laws that prohibit youngsters to complete certain actions like smoking, drinking, or going to R movies, these actions don’t seem to affect other it might affect them, however, once they commit a horrifying crime they are being tried as adults. In addition, Lundstrom argues that “Today we are witness to criminal defendants facing a life sentence without parole…” (Lundstrom, 10). Lundstrom continues by stating that juveniles cannot shave and still play with toys also they act scenes from their favorite T.V. shows. Further information that researchers have studies on teen brains with technology that maps the patterns of brain growth in children and teenagers, has given information that indicate that teenagers are having a massive loss of brain tissue this scientific evidence has also sparked the opponents, and argue that this evidence is why juveniles should not be facing life sentence in prison without parole.…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This is not to argue about the pros and cons of the death penalty and juveniles, but to give data it can inform the controversial argument to focus on the Death Penalty and Juveniles. This is important to the general area under study because it will give a clearer view on the opinions of each person on the death penalty and juveniles. The intent is to provide details of death penalty and juveniles, whereas to give an understanding of what causes these young offenders to commit a crime and why the law agrees with the death penalty on juveniles with no difference from the adults. Additional studies show the death penalty used with juveniles may perhaps appear to be civilized or not. Sentencing a juvenile to death could lead to asking questions for…

    • 2957 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The article On Punishment and Teen Killers by Jennifer Bishop Jenkins speaks about how we here in the United States although we do give teenage murderers very big sentences that make them spend the rest of their life in prison we still respect their human rights. We do not imprison children nor torture and hurt the offenders, we simply are not letting their crimes go in vain. The authors purpose is to let us know that all though many people believe that teenagers who commit crimes should have a smaller sentence because of the way and the time it takes for their minds to develop. In fact she even states the following, "If brain development were the reason, then teens would kill at roughly the same rates all over the world. They do not.…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Today, there are only three different countries一Saudi Arabia, Yemen, and Iran, who sentence the death penalty to people that have yet to turn eighteen. Before the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in Roper v. Simmons, the United States used to be on that list. After the Supreme Court’s decision, anyone who was on death row for crimes that they had committed prior to turning eighteen were put off death row. Instead, they were sentenced to life without parole. No Choirboy written by Susan Kuklin, looks into five different stories of people who were affected by the death penalty in the United States prior to the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision.…

    • 2278 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The opposition believes that juveniles should be allowed to be sentenced to mandatory life in prison.the opposition claims that recent brain research made on teen brains has nothing to do with teens committing crime. Author of On Punishment and Teen Killers, Jennifer Jenkins claims that, “ Advocates often repeat, but truly misunderstand brain research on this issue. The actual science does not… in any way negate criminal culpability” (Jenkins). The idea behind this statement is that the recent research on teenage brains is invalid for proving a juvenile less innocent. This idea is highly disagreeable because juveniles are nothing like adults especially in decision making.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Crime and Punishment in America through the Years Crime and punishment in the United States of America has changed through the years’ time and time again. Presidents through time, as well as the American population, have been the cause for all the “see-sawing” between crime and punishment. Most of the recent back and forth comes from the human interpretation of what a “cruel and unusual punishment” is, and from the questions of justification for the state taking a life. These questions date back to 1767 when Cesare Beccaria’s published “Crime and Punishment,” an essay which helped abolitionists show their voice and views on capital punishment.…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over 100 years ago the United States established the Juvenile Justice system. In most states, a person who between the ages of 10 and 18 charged with a crime is considered a juvenile . The juvenile justice system main goal is to help rehabilitation rather than punishing the individual and held youths who commit crimes responsible for their action. Where adults who are accused and found guilty of a crime, the criminal justice courts focus on punishments. There are many debates over the juvenile justice on whether or not the system should need to focus more on proving rehabilitation or punishment like the adult criminal justice system .…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays